|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:48 AM Original message |
Jeepers creepers Peeps, Get control of yourselves. Story was in the EXAMINER ON FEB 4th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM Original message |
But Obama has spoken. It is to blame Hillary for it all. No deviation. Comply or else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
57. I will not be assimulated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemzRock (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. And it will be on the front page of the Times on Nov 1 and the lead story on ABC network news too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. And? It's not like those mailers that Hillary is suddenly "enraged" over are new. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Unless it suits Obama. If it is against Hillary all sources are good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. If the Clinton campaign is sending Drudge info about fellow Democrats... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Really. Drudge doesn't need anyone to feed him information. Pure speculation done to smear Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Then her campaign needs to deny this immediately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Why? Is that going to make a difference? No. It has been out for awhile. They love what they're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I'm sorry to hear that you do not care about the integrity of the Democratic party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Go on drama queens for Obama. No evidence of anything just smears from Obama and his surrogates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
61. Guess you missed William Kristol being praised here for attacking Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemzRock (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:52 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Drudge tried to tear Bill Clinton 849 new holes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Kristi1696 do you have evidence Hillary sent those photos? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:56 AM Original message |
Politico is reporting that the campaign did not deny sending the photos... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. No denial from the HRC camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Nor are all the nasty and untrue flyers that Clinton has sent out about obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
26. No, she was enraged because she thought they had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. No, I was just told Clinton had "ALL MORNING" to deny "circulating" this picture & hasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. And what if it comes out that it IS true? Then what will you say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. That WHAT is true? That someone emailed an undoctored photo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. No one is denying that it has been in circulation. The question is, why are Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
42. Nobody is shook up over a photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. It's either true, OR they have so little control over their campaign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
7. But the issue is that the picture in question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemzRock (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Will Joe Shmoe care about who sent it or that Obama is really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Obama is not a Muslim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemzRock (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Yes, he is supposedly a Christian (from an odd Church too) but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. I think democrats will care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Exactly and Obama is using it to smear Hillary. He is pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #32 |
46. what planet are you on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Yeah right. This crap of Obama letting the dogs loose on Hillary once again is old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Deleted message |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Typical response filled with no evidence just outrage. I'm proud to be on your ignore list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. I'm proud to be on many ignore lists. I wish I was on more of them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. The original source is not the issue. Clinton campaign workers circulating it is the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. Big diff between rethugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
20. So that's where the Clintons found that. Gotcha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
24. Nancy Pelosi in a head scarf caused the right wingers' heads to explode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
27. From a NATIONAL ENQUIRER article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. The question is not who published it, but who is publicizing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. They are to mesmerized to see............They do not want truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
30. Good find. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Levgreee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
35. The Clinton camp could still "distribute it" if it as been previously released sometime n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
58. so could the Obama camp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
36. So what? The Examiner is a tabloid- HRC is CIRCULATING tabloid trash! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
37. Also, freepers wanted to get it to Drudge - according to Raw Story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Sorry doesn't fit the ongoing story line that Obama is a victim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. And... the Clinton's took the freepers advice, apparantly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Proof????? Just more empty words with nothing to back them up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
39. Thanks for the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. you are very welcome. I wonder if Raw Story will credit a lowly DU poster in their story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
40. Obama's campaign would not connect Hillary to the story without validation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
41. We expected no less in the smear department his popularity continues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
44. Hillary Clinton woos man (Drudge) who nearly ruined her husband |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
45. I saw that photo at the Freepers site way before Drudge claimed to have received it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. this is ridiculous. grasping at straws. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
51. RAW STORY I HOPE YOU GIVE DU CREDIT!!!! AND LINK TO THIS PAGE. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
53. Obamababies so in a hurry to blame Hillary instead of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. BO believed DRUDGE, a RW website, then criticized Clinton. And obamafolk say OK!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
60. So everybody believes Drudge now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
workinclasszero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
62. Started at Freakrepublic, Continued by Hillary operatives at another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC