Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2004: Republicans fund Nader as Electoral Weapon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:07 AM
Original message
2004: Republicans fund Nader as Electoral Weapon

The move intensifies the war between Republicans and Democrats over Mr Nader's candidacy, a conflict fuelled by the maverick's willingness to accept funds and help from some of George Bush's most ardent supporters.

Republicans are eager to see Mr Nader do well -
not because of his stand on the environment or Iraq -but in the hope that he will tip the balance towards Mr Bush in the race against John Kerry, the Democratic challenger. But the Democrats have stood their ground, with activists harrying Mr Nader's effort to get on the ballot in several states.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/aug/10/uselections2004.usa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Meow-Mix I caught something about that this morning
As we know, Nader is progressive. If anyone doesn't know the history of Nader should read up on it. He's an interesting read. Anyway, back to the point of the thread, in a Huckabee interview this morning he stated he was glad Nader was running this year because it only takes away from the democratic vote. So I have to agree with your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they finance him, he gladly accepts it and then damages dems.
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 11:42 AM by meow mix
this makes him a rightwing fighter because his words do not make up for his actions.
he needs to be stripped of his liberal progressive labels lol need a national smear campaign to relabel him appropriatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. 0.38% - Yeah, a lot of good that did
People here way overestimate Nader. Nobody gives a shit about him except perhaps Nader himself and his massive ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC