Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Endorsement: Time to clean house

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:31 PM
Original message
Endorsement: Time to clean house
The Daily Texan 2/22/08
~snip~
As voters, we're often torn between our hearts and our minds when making crucial decisions concerning the welfare of the country. This endorsement is no different.

In the past year, we have been entranced by the powerful timbre of Barack Obama's voice. We have felt our hearts soar with each progressive idea he has put forth, especially his call for youth action and enrollment in public service programs. But we do not think he is the wisest choice for president. George W. Bush has made a mess of America, and we believe Hillary Clinton is the best person to clean it up. She is prepared and willing to be a leader who is "a lot less hat and a lot more cattle," as she stated during Thursday night's debate.

Clinton is a seasoned politician, and some argue that works against her. But Bush has been wildly successful in destroying every positive function of the machine that is Washington, D.C., and Clinton has the political tools and knowledge to fix it.

We have admired the consistent integrity of Obama's campaign. He is everything a politician shouldn't be, meaning that we think he is a good human being. To truly be a leader we can look up to, Clinton should learn from her refined opponent's style.

But during Thursday's debate, Obama made a major gaffe in incorrectly stating that he had received endorsements from every major newspaper in Texas. We may not be considered a "major" paper to many, but we represent a crucial constituency of close to 50,000 young and enthusiastic voters, and we've been scrutinizing every move of the candidates leading up to today's endorsement. Sure, Obama took many under his spell when he graced our city with his presence early in his campaign, but we think he prematurely considered his work in Austin done.~snip~

More at link. Great 2 page article.

http://media.www.dailytexanonline.com/media/storage/paper410/news/2008/02/22/Opinion/Endorsement.Time.To.Clean.House-3228848.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very nice that she got the college paper endorsement
it's been posted here multiple times, but hey go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, you know how poorly Obama has done with the college crowd
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oops Obama . . . I'm sure you didn't mean to exaggerate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess when you don't get many newspaper endorsements
you just have to keep recycling the one from the college paper in thread after thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...So The Daily Texan Endorses Clinton Because They Felt Slighted By Obama?
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 05:38 PM by The_Counsel
"We have admired the consistent integrity of Obama's campaign. He is everything a politician shouldn't be, meaning that we think he is a good human being. To truly be a leader we can look up to, Clinton should learn from her refined opponent's style.

But during Thursday's debate, Obama made a major gaffe in incorrectly stating that he had received endorsements from every major newspaper in Texas. We may not be considered a "major" paper to many, but we represent a crucial constituency of close to 50,000 young and enthusiastic voters, and we've been scrutinizing every move of the candidates leading up to today's endorsement..."



The Texan has a right to its own opinion and all, but isn't this a little petty? Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. What an Uninformed Endorsement
I dont have a problem with them endorsing Hillary, but two of the reasons are just ludicrous. Firt of all, to get all huffy about Obama not considering a college newspaper as a major one is just silly. Second, they claim that Obama has ignored them sincce his rally earlier on. Maybe they should check his schedule before they say such BS. He showed up there after their endorsement to 20-30,000 people. Wonder if the editorial board showed up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why do you hate these college kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because they are uninformed idiots that should look at Obama's Schedule before acting like idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. You just can't stand that she got an endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Suggest you read the comments page of this "Major" paper n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenRob Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. wow... this editorial used HRC talking points.
"George W. Bush has made a mess of America, and we believe Hillary Clinton is the best person to clean it up."

Isn't that straight out of a HRC campaign speech? Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is at least the 3rd time this has been posted
1. The Daily Texas is not a major newspaper, no matter how hard they want that to be true.
2. There was a rally the same day this was published, so I feel the editors were grossly uninformed on the Obama campaign in the first place.
3. Basically they like Clinton because she promised them more tickets to the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Well, it WAS nicely worded.
Some of us agree with the sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. LOL!
Endorsements out of spite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. School Newspaper Endorses Hillary, a major victory, Damn Obama's delegate lead looks unimportant now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC