|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:10 AM Original message |
Hillary didn't reject the Independence Party line: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. Reject their support, hell, she ran as THEIR CANDIDATE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. I was too tired to go look for it. Thanks. Predictable. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. SHAME ON YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
4. Nice of you to switch years on your PDF. Distort and destroy Obama style |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That link does not address the OP. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Are you blind? The OP put in a 2000 article, but a 2006 PDF to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Excuse me? The OP made no effort to obscure anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Clinton referred to the 2000 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. How? She didn't get their support in 2000 but got it in 2006? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Lenora Fulani |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Yes, I understand that now but isn't that a pretty slender branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
63. Nothing in the OP says she accepted it in 2000, the link specifically say 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 06:04 AM Response to Reply #63 |
80. The OP edited his post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
66. Read the first link in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:57 AM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Kicked out, you say? Could you provide a link? I don't believe you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:17 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I protest this link, it only shows that she was forced to give up her LEADERSHIP role |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:21 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. oh for god's sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:25 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. What happened, we were getting along so well there for a couple of posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:57 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Hillary was grandstanding last night, the 2000 move was political. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. You are trying to be coy, the move was politically motivated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Yes, The OP Is A Lie, And A Disgusting Distortion At That. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
65. The cocky one is you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
62. Not according to wikipedia - they wanted to kick her out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. but saying Hillary tells the truth and proving it is not allowed on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. It's a new party? They're no longer as bad a she claims? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
68. The 2006 article mentions that HRC and Spritzer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 06:07 AM Response to Reply #68 |
81. She was in the leadership of the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
59. I take it as two seperate parts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Did she actively and publicly reject this group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I don't know, she said she did tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
77. Are you really surprised? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. Wow, is this true? The media will bust her if it is. Yikes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. No it's not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Did she ACTIVELY reject them or did she talk to them about gaining their support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Well they didnt' support her in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Sorry, not enough for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I agree that the OP made a mistake BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
9. You're mixing up two different elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. In six years, will it be okay to accept Farrakhan's support? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Don't be dense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Who was involved in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. What do you mean who was involved? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:49 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. In New York's Independence Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:12 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I already said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:28 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. September 2006: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 06:08 AM Response to Reply #44 |
82. And you can't even read well enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
71. No they weren't - they still controlled Manhattan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
70. The first articel is from 2000 - and it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sir_captain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
21. It was a bullshit argument anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
30. And 7 recs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:49 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Here is the story: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:09 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. How does that mitigate the fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:19 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. What about your claim upthread that these people are longer with the party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:23 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Let's deal with one topic at a time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
45. denounce-reject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Politics! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
51. can you please specify where your sources come from when you link them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
52. What A Bunch Of Disgracefully Deceitful Bullshit. Way To Go Trying To Twist Reality Like That. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Here, this is for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. What In The World Does That Have To Do With The Disgraceful An Intentionally Deceitful OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Screaming doesn't change the facts. Hillary used a political play in 2000 to try to score political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. You're Right. Screaming Doesn't. Disgustingly Shameful Posters Who Intend To Deceive, Do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. There Will Come A Time When You Will Have To Face Reality! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. I Face Reality With Every Breath I Take. And Again, That's Irrelevant As It Relates To |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Hillary's tactic was desperate: she tried to stake claim to being principled, but her motive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Again, Irrelevant As It Relates To Your Intentionally Deceiving OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Keep telling yourself that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. Here's One Last Smack Of Reality For Ya Before I Go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. "You have a blatant anti-Hillary OP in a forum dominated by Obama supporters/anti-Hillary people." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. Your tactic was desperate. And speak of political motives.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. You can say whatever you want to. The thread is littered with facts about the party and Hillary's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. your OP is thrashy and shows diception. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
74. I'm confused... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. I'm not confused by Hillary's hypocrisy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
78. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC