Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After the Cleveland Debate, Not Even Clinton's Spinners Could Claim Victory for Her

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:38 PM
Original message
After the Cleveland Debate, Not Even Clinton's Spinners Could Claim Victory for Her
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/davidcorn/2008/02/after-the-cleveland-debate-not.html

After the Cleveland Debate, Not Even Clinton's Spinners Could Claim Victory for Her

By David Corn | February 27, 2008 9:16 AM

Here's a simple way of summing up Tuesday night's debate in Cleveland between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Minutes after Thursday night's debate in Austin ended, the Clinton campaign zapped out a triumphant email to reporters:

snip//

No such email followed the conclusion of the Cleveland debate. About an hour after it finished--it took an hour?!--the Clinton campaign disseminated a statement from Ohio Governor Ted Strickland, a Clinton supporter:

Hillary Clinton showed Ohioans again tonight why she is uniquely qualified to be president and begin turning our economy around on her first day in office. Hillary is the fighter, the doer and the champion Ohio's working families need. No one is better prepared to deliver quality, affordable health care for every American and lead our country as commander in chief.

Note that there was no claim of victory. Another Clinton email cited positive insta-reviews in the media about Clinton. NBC News' Andrea Mitchell, for instance, had said that Clinton "came across very credibly, very strongly as a fighter." That was true. The problem was that Obama came across rather well, too. None of the quotes her campaign found useful described Clinton's overall performance as a game-changer. And that's the point. She did perform in a fine manner. But Obama, coming across as smooth, confident, smart, passionate, and poised, did at least as well, if not better. It was the Clinton camp that wanted more and more debates. But Obama keeps improving, while she long ago hit the ceiling (and it's a high ceiling) in terms of debate performance.

So the Clinton campaign was--finally--unable to spin a victory claim. That would be playing with reality too much. And when a presidential candidate's spinners cannot claim a debate win, that candidate is in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Considering how they even spun that standing ovation at the
previous debate for HRC (it was the end of the debate, so it was for both candidates) then this is really, really bad. I'd say they are just about to throw in the towel. It's got to be extremely depressing in their meetings about now.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, Clinton's spinners sure could claim victory for her
.... have you seen this forum since the debate ended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. For some DUers, if Hillary had
Laid on the floor and kicked and screamed, they still would claim Hillary won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is this the last of babylon's 3 GD-P post allotment?
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:46 PM by Tarc
Time to go get lunch soon, and I'd rather not hurl it back up upon returning.

When the other person just weakly "me toos" half the time, that is a win for her by default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. You have to be kidding. Obama was great last night. Hillary looked half a sleep.
She didn't come across as a strong leader, she seemed weak and acted like the underdog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's playing checkers - He's playing chess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. short and
succinct... bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thanks....
And hi from Lakewood!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. She's NCAA hes NFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary's Reviews Are In: ‘A Strong New Note,’ ‘Effective Tone,’ ‘A Solid Body Blow’
Lindsay Levin 2/26/2008 11:09:54 PM

NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell –Hillary ‘came across very credibly, very strongly as a fighter.’

NBC News’ Domenico Montaro – ‘That was a solid body blow by Clinton on Obama not holding a single hearing on Afghanistan.’ “That was a solid body blow by Clinton on Obama not holding a single hearing on Afghanistan despite that he talks about it being the front line on terrorism and that he chairs the subcommittee on Europe, which oversees NATO. While Obama's explanation may be realistic -- that he became chair at the beginning of his campaign -- doesn't it reinforce Hillary and Bill Clinton's points that he is inexperienced, that he has only been in the Senate for a limited time and hasn't cut his teeth yet. Doesn't that play right into the inexperience narrative quite well?”

ABC News’ Rick Klein – ‘It does seem like Clinton has settled on an effective tone this evening.’ “That silly distraction of an SNL reference aside -- it does seem like Clinton has settled on an effective tone this evening. She's mixing substance with style, attacking without seeming overtly negative, sounding like she's playing defense when she's really playing offense.”


The Swamp's Jason George – 'Clinton strikes a new strong note, saying she plans to get $55 billion back from special interest groups for the American middle class.'

NBC News’ David Gregory said Hillary’s ‘answer on having to be a fighter on health care is her strong suit.’ “Senator Clinton the fighter. This answer on having to be a fighter on health care is her strong suit. Her point in lampooning Obama's high-flying oratory is to say, I, too, had only the highest ideals about public service in Washington. But I know through experience, you need different tactics. This is her experience argument.”

MyDD’s Todd Beeton – Hillary’s ‘I’m a fighter’ line was ‘one of her best selling points.’ "Hillary Clinton: "I'm a fighter." One of her best selling points, especially against Obama."

Ohio Daily Blog – ‘Clinton did well with Russert's question about her 2000 pledge about creating jobs in Buffalo.’

WCPO Radio’s Dan Walthrip – ‘Hillary Clinton certainly claimed ownership of the word 'universal' in terms of healthcare.’
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Tell that to Cleveland:
:eyes:

http://www.cleveland.com/editorials/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1204113439284890.xml&coll=2


Editorial: Barack Obama showed in debate he has best chance to achieve changes
Wednesday, February 27, 2008

snip//

In purely political terms, Clinton needed somehow to change the momentum of a campaign that is undeniably slipping away from her. She failed.

As he has done repeatedly in recent weeks, Obama consistently deflected her efforts to portray him as callow or somehow indifferent to Democratic Party principles.

Obama disputed the idea that he is all about pretty talk. But he noted, quite effectively and correctly, that to achieve real change, a president must inspire the American people to demand it, must bring together people in a new sense of cooperation and self-interest.

In her final seconds, Clinton urged voters to ask themselves who can actually change the country.

The problem for her is that the question had already been asked and answered.

And once again, Obama had prevailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Waves to babylonsister
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. He got the only applause line. She got the only boo line.
All other things being equal, that says a lot.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Two points
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:55 PM by psychopomp
First, the image of a "fighter" does not seem to be apt given Sen. Clinton's "meet me in Ohio" posturing before the debate, which led to a lot of anticipation for a Bust-Up in the Buckeye State.

That package was not delivered when she met Sen. Obama in Cleveland. Whether she was spent or not, she just did not seem to be able to get things started for herself during the debate.

My second observation is that Sen. Clinton looked as a person who had, deep down inside, resigned herself to yielding to her opponent. If you look at how things have quieted down on GD-P (take a look at thread views) it seems a large number of people foresee an end coming soon for the past few weeks' emotional roller-coaster.

In that light it might be best to tone down the rhetoric and even pause for silence as the icy grey waters lick at the deck of the once-invincible ship that was the Clinton campaign.

(edit: who knew that GD: P when typed without the space would come out looking like GD:P?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Operative Word From The Clinton Camp Was "Fighter".....
most of the HRC surrogates last night and this morning made sure that they said that word. This must have went out before the debate and was reinforced afterwards.

I don't think it worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary lost this debate in her opening statement...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ted is not having a partiuclarly good week
First he gets stuck on stage as solo back up singer for Clinton meltdown now he gets stuck with driving the bus out of the ditch.
No wonder he is saying Ohio is in doubt


http://www.texasobserver.org/article.php?aid=2689
After Sen. Barack Obama's decisive victory over Sen. Hillary Clinton in Wisconsin, Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland was reported expressing doubt to political colleagues about whether he could hold his state for Clinton during the two weeks remaining before Ohio's Democratic presidential primary March 4.

Polls taken before Wisconsin voted gave Clinton a double-digit lead in Ohio, a state necessary to sustain her presidential hopes. A Clinton win there also might be needed for Strickland's chances to be the running mate for either Clinton or Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC