Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary being called a "Bitch": Makes me want to get on the next wave of feminism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:37 AM
Original message
Hillary being called a "Bitch": Makes me want to get on the next wave of feminism
I dont know about you guys ... but I am sick of Hillary trashing. I support Obama but I do not like seeing Hillary trashed. Anyone interested in signing up for re-examining women's rights and coming up with a new platform please post below.

Anyone who wants to debate the "bitch issue" please go to another thread. There are lots of other threads for that issue. I will ask the mods to delete your post if you insist on continuing that argument here.

Hillary and Obama supporters, let's come together on this issue. Please start posting about the stuff you would like to see the next Democratic president do for women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why Is Sexism Accepted In So Called "Polite Circles" But Racism Isn't?
Ditto for homophobia being acceptable...

Shouldn't we condemn all forms of bigotry with one voice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yes we should
But women who are powerful, agressive, smart, and out and out fighters will always scare the hell out of men and many women. Using sexist or denegrating langage toward women is how those doing it combat their own fears, at least in their own minds.

Left of Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
47. Goddamn Right
I wonder how long a thread with the "N" word would last, or how often it would come up? people who start that shit are going down the wrong path, and as I predicted earlier today, an increasing number b***h threads has popped up in GDP. Yes, this shit HAS to stop.
But at least when this primary is truly over, 99.9% of these people will disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama supporter here and I do not tolerate
name calling and labeling women. Obama stays above the fray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I Still Hear "So Called" Educated People Making Homophobic And Sexist Remarks
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 08:44 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. thank you. I know Obama would be appalled by the name-calling of some of his fans here on DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midora Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
78. A Mean Woman
No, it's not appropriate to call a public figure running for political office a bitch. That five letter word might be accurate, but I won't use it. How about if I say she's a mean woman whose weapons of choice are vitriol and bitter sarcasm? I would never vote for her, and if she wins the nomination, I will be staying home on Election Day.

The sad thing is I actually agree with her on a lot of things. But her sniping and negative attacks turn me off. She is too partsian and too divisive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for bringing the issue up, or not, as the case may be.
When Senator Clinton held a commanding lead in opinion polls last summer and well into the fall and late fall, I didn't hear objections to her being victimized.

When her campaign's ineptitude and arrogance resulted in a plunge in her polling, then we got the Hillary-as-Victim threads.

No sale. She entered the field "to win it," she said, and she knew what she was getting into.

She's an Ivy League-educated woman and a 2-term U.S. Senator, as well as a wealthy former First Lady. I add that up and don't get "victim."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. How Does Losing Her Lead In A Poll Turn Her Into A "Stupid" Or "Fucking Bitch"?
If Barney Frank loses his congressional seat does that turn him into a "flaming faggot"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You are connecting two disparate things. Try evaluating the one you raised.
If your contention is that sexism exists, of course it does. I seriously doubt anyone will argue that point. I hope they don't, anyway.

But Clinton was champ for months on end but there were no posters railing against sexism in regard to her candidacy while she was in the lead.

And a substantial lead it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes, there were.
I started defending her against sexism when she was in the lead, as did others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Well, good, but the point stands, doesn't it, that the sheer number of
posts portraying her as the victim of sexism increased exponentially correspondent to her losing her once-commanding lead?

Senator Clinton's problem is not sexism. It's lousy campaign strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Do you have a graph or something?
And, can you factor in the number of posts on the primaries overall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. That can be your project if you want. You have a star. Do your own
footwork.

Clinton has lost ground not least because her campaign has been a shitty mess.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. It was your claim, not mine.
And I'm not arguing about her campaign. That's a separate matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. If it's a separate matter, Sparkly, then the OP is mistaken.
It is in fact my claim and I'll stand by it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
71. The OP is about calling Hillary a "bitch"
not a discussion of how well her campaign's been run. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #71
86. I get the point, but I see that the post was presented in GD-Primaries
and that Senator Clinton's name is predominant.

You can understand why one might think that was on the OP's mind.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. This is silly.
You said "there were no posters railing against sexism in regard to her candidacy while she was in the lead." That's what I responded to.

Perhaps because you didn't have a response to my response, you introduced a different track. No, it wasn't the OP -- clearly, that was written by an Obama supporter sick of the apolitical attacks on Clinton. I think the point there was clear.

So, I'll take this all as an "Okay, there actually were some posters railing against sexism in regard to her candidacy while she was in the lead." Many posters defended her while not supporting her campaign. Two separate things, as the OP here emphasized, as well.

I accept your apology. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. You think she's going to win the nomination?
And do you really think if she doesn't it's because of sexism?

Now read the OP again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. I doubt it, but you're changing the subject again.
And in this discussion, it doesn't matter what I think the reasons are.

I don't know what you think the OP is saying. :shrug:

I defended her, as did others, when she was a front-runner. And it didn't have anything to do with her candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. Her being a frontrunner has nothing to do with her candidacy?
I applaud your defending anybody against bigotry, no question there.

But her candidacy is what is provoking vacuous posts like the OP's.

And a great deal of others correspondent to her plunge in the polls.

She's a candidate for public office. She's lost a big lead. She's no longer the inevitable nominee. The OP cries sexism in the GD-Primaries forum.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #95
96. "I support Obama but I do not like seeing Hillary trashed. "
Sometimes things ARE what they seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. They may well be what they seem but that doesn't make them thoughtful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
49. A shitty mess indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
60. dont want to debate the point... I am just energized to take action
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:22 PM by cap
after the campaign .... that's my point.... Please go elsewhere to debate it. I want action after this campaign is over.... and I want to start making a change in the way we do business. There are too few women in power... Often there is only one.... as in this case.

Please go to another thread and continue this discussion. I want to start to pull together an action plan for 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #60
87. Well, cap, I go elsewhere all the time. I go to the grocery store, the
post office, to see a film -- the whole works.

You're posting in GD-Primaries if I'm not mistaken.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. You shouldn't attribute someone's actions to their race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation...
It robs all of us of our individuality....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. But robbing "all of us" of our individuality is what I DO. That's why they
pay me the big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. The HillaryHaters will all fade away soon, no matter who gets the nom.
They're not really Obama supporters, so if Obama wins they'll have nothing to post about anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
67. I don't know about that. That much hate doesn't just vanish overnight. Hate transference is a very
real possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. She has earned the trashing that she gets by her despicable actions
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 08:48 AM by JVS
Now in order not for my disgust to be mistaken for sexism, I will call her a nice a gender neutral term:
She's a total asshole, and I reach this conclusion by taking her at her word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. the MATURE obamafolk are into vile thrashing nor name-calling!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
easy_b94 Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. MY mom watch 60 Min. last night and she call her a bitch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I Am Half Jewish
Can I call Jews I don't like kikes, Jew bastards, and Christ killers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. But....
SNL said that "bitch" is the new black. And we all know that Hillary uses SNL as the guide for honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. Did They Say Bitch Should Be Prefaced By "Fucking" Or "Stupid"?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Why would that
matter?

Did they say "bias unfair media" should be prefaced by "fucking" or "stupid"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. That's so missing the point
I can't figure out if the people who keep bringing up SNL are just clueless or willfully obtuse. As if, now that SNL did a skit, it's now totally OK to call women a slur! That skit was about taking ownership of a slur & removing some of the sting. Other groups have done this as well; gays have adopted the word "queer" as a way of taking away the negative power of the word & showing pride. But that does not give permission to people to use it as an insult & way of demeaning somebody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Vote In Pittsburgh Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. My mom is in her 60s and she calls her a bitch too
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:24 PM by I Vote In Pittsburgh
And my mom would walk over coals to strangle Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
59. This remark is off topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Vote In Pittsburgh Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. No it isn't
The fact that so many women are insulting Hillary implies that there is more to Hillary hating than sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. I did not intend for this thread to be a discussion of whether there is sexism
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:36 PM by cap
I want this thread to be about being energized to do something about it such that this does not happen again. Please go to other threads and continue the discussion there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
74. your mom has a problem
...it's known as internalized misogyny.
(And your point in reporting on your mom is...?
Do you think that because you mom is female that makes it OK? Geez. we've not come very far it seems.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanr516 Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't know how to handle it.
The main difference I see in sexist/homophobic remarks vs. racist remarks is that most of us seem to be able to recognize a racist remark immediately. In the case of sexism/homophobia, many people don't have a clue that their remarks are considered disparaging to these groups. Just because one may use a sexist term about a man, or a homophobic slur about someone who's straight, doesn't make those terms and slurs less sexist/homophobic.

Am I making sense? Maybe gently pointing out the nature of these terms after the heat of the primary wars has lessened might help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. The sexism, hit what I thought was my last nerve, at the Iowa debate. Then
came the New Hampshire debate and it threw me over the top! Who knew that sexism would turn me from a hard core Edwards' supporter into a Hillary supporter? I am glad it did though, because it made me get to really know more about what her policies are. I still have a soft spot in my heart for Edwards, he became my second choice until he dropped out. Point being: I was shocked to see how many sexist's do not even know that they are sexist. I thought we had, come a long way baby. I was very wrong, we've got many miles to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. Who is calling her a B****?
Is it the media or all the Obama supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. "Name removed", mostly. Our Mods are doing fine work!
If only tombstones followed for the Haters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. some
obama supporters have take it as their sport today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
24. hillary needs to stop acting like one, then...her "as far as i know" comment re: Obama's religion-
was just a slimy jab that she didn't have to tack on to her statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. That's A Ridiculous Argument
If a Jewish person uses shoddy busineness practice does that make him or her a "Kike"?

If an African American person robs a 7/11 does that make him a "N-word"?

If a gay person says something you find offensive does that make him a "fag"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. it's more than just the one comment- it's her entire demeanor throughout this campaign.
the "as far as i know" comment wasn't necessarily the bitchiest, just the latest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Your Argument Becomes More Ridiculous
Let me ask you a question.

If a person offends me is it morally permissible for me to attribute that person's actions to his or her race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation?

For instance my former business partner and I got cheated by this man who happened to be gay... My former business partner used every homophobic epithet he could think of to describe the guy...Was that permissible?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. i'm not blaming hillary's campaign conduct on her race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation-
i'm blaming it on the fact that she's being bitchy about a lot of things- and if obama were being bitchy about it, i'd say the same about him.
but he's not.
she is.

as far as your business partner's attitude- as long as no actual laws were broken, then yes,it's "permissible" because people are entitled to their opinions. if he did it in a way that breaks the law, then no- it's not "permissible"- that's how free speech works in this country. you may not like or agree with everything someone says- but that has NO bearing on their RIGHT to voice their opinion.

would you prefer that the 1st amendment be scrapped entirely, or just re-written to suit you? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. The First Amendment Only Protects You From The Government
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 10:20 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
If it didn't Fuzzy Zoeller, Don Imus, Jimmy The Greek, and Al Campanis would still have the jobs from which they were fired from...


You still miss the point...When I was nine years old, an African American kid stole my bicycle...By your logic he would be a n-word...To me he was just a thief...

Interpeting someone's actions through the prism of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etcetera is the hallmark of bigotry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
66. they may not have jobs- but they weren't prosecuted for anything involving what they said.
i don't think you know what your point is-
btw- the only way that "my logic" would make the black kid that stole your bike a ni**er, is if that's what YOU really wanted to call him. (and that certainly seems to be the case)

as i said before- i'm NOT interpreting hillary's actions through race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc.- i use the word "bitch" to describe bitchy actions by both men and womem, and hillary was being a royal bitch in her comments about obama's religious affiliations.

it REALLY is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. It Is Not That Simple
You refuse to acknowledge that you're interpeting her actions through the prism of gender...I am glad, that even at nine years old, I knew better than to interpet someone's actions through the prism of race...

People do messed up things all the time and it has nothing to do with their race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation.

What part of that don't you understand?

And for your edification here's the definition of bitch:


bitch /bɪtʃ/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. a female dog.
2. a female of canines generally.
3. Slang. a. a malicious, unpleasant, selfish person, esp. a woman.
b. a lewd woman.


When you're in a hole it's time to stop digging...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. it is that simple for me...i use the term bitch in reference to both men and women...
if that's too difficult a concept for you to grasp- it's not my problem.

it's yours.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Maybe You Need To Create A New Dictionary And New Definitions
bitch /bɪtʃ/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. a female dog.
2. a female of canines generally.
3. Slang. a. a malicious, unpleasant, selfish person, esp. a woman.
b. a lewd woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. not necessary...
i know exactly what i mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. You Can Call A Horse A Plane But That Doesn't Mean It Can Fly
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. She talks of how the Muslim rumor is a smear job-Did you forget that comment in your hate?




Forum Name General Discussion: Primaries
Topic subject SHAME ON YOU, Steve Kroft, for asking Hillary about Obama's religion!
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4856180#4856180
4856180, SHAME ON YOU, Steve Kroft, for asking Hillary about Obama's religion!
Posted by Apollo11 on Mon Mar-03-08 05:08 AM

AND SHAME ON YOU, Obama supporters, for accusing Hillary of trying to gain some kind of political advantage by supposedly encouraging voters to be fearful of the possibility that Obama might be a Muslim.

PLUS PROPS to Hillary for dealing with this question with clarity and truthfulness! B-)


Hillary Clinton on CBS - 60 Minutes - March 2nd, 2008 (my transcript)

KROFT: You don't believe that Senator Obama's a Muslim?

HILLARY: Of course not. I mean that's, you know, there is no basis for that. You know, I take him on the basis of what he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that.

KROFT: You said you take Senator Obama at his word that he's not a Muslim.

HILLARY: Right. Right.

KROFT: You don't believe that he's a Muslim?

HILLARY: No. No. Why would I? There's no ... No. There's nothing to base that on - as far as I know.

KROFT: It's just scurillous ...

HILLARY: Look, I have been the target of so many ridiculous rumours. I have a great deal of sympathy for anyone who gets, you know, smeared by the kind of rumours that go on all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Hillary Clinton knows full well what church Barack Obama belongs to.
Her remarks were untoward and smarmy.

"As far as I know..."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. but the "as far as i know" comment basically negated all of that.
it was totally unnecessary, especially with the inflection she put on it while speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Agreed. Sen. Clinton forgets, on purpose, that words really do matter.
And her choice of words in that interview was notably smarmy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
25. How about reviving the Equal Rights Amendment?
Even if it never passes, it does get the debate going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I'm for it and endorse your idea. It's long overdue, in fact,
and should have been undertaken in the 8 years of the Bill Clinton administration.

Next best time is right now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
81. hear hear....
(fist pounding the table!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
42. I am not seeing any "wave" of feminism as a bad wave to get onto, and see
them all as one "wave," and not several. That Oldsmobile commercial never had much impact with me.

So this is in fact your mother's and great grand-mother's feminism, IMO.

If you are going to hop onto a feminist wave, I suggest a different list of exponents. Katha Pollitt would be very high on my list, well ahead of Hillary Clinton.

I think feminism rightly begins with a time none of us can remember in temporal terms. It begins with Sappho's poems. More recently it is manifest in the life and work of Georgia O'Keeffe.

Adrienne Rich.

Maya Angelou.

Dar Williams.

Etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
43. You are always going to have a certain amount of that in any campaign.
Obama can't control what some of his fanatical supporters might say at DU, including the use of the "B" world. Likewise, Clinton can't control all of her supporters either. It's the nature of the beast. But the vast majority of supporters on both sides are good people who don't engage in sleazy rhetoric. That's the thing to remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
46. I don't think that Tina Fey meant any harm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
48. Sexism is candidate Clinton's primary opponent [Philly Inquier}


http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080123_Sexism_is_candidate_Clintons_primary_opponent.html

Sexism is candidate Clinton's primary opponent

Jodi Enda- is a former White House correspondent for Knight-Ridder


Posted on Wed, Jan. 23, 2008


No one has called Barack Obama a witch.

No one has suggested John McCain is too ambitious.

No one has disparaged Mitt Romney for misting up.

No one has accused John Edwards of faking emotions.

No one has depicted Mike Huckabee as calculating.

No one has critiqued the pitch of Rudy Giuliani's voice.

No one says male presidential aspirants are cold or feisty or careless about their cleavage (or any other anatomical feature). If they tear up, or even - gasp! - cry, no one says men are too weak to run the country. If they blow a gasket (à la Bill Clinton), it's manly. If they blow off a question (classic Reagan), it's strategic.

But when a woman has a chance to win the presidency, all bets are off. It's no conspiracy; this is America.

Sure, Hillary Clinton is a popular target in ways that other women are not. Clinton-hating is something of a blood sport, and nothing Clinton does will undo that. Still, the haters did little to diminish her husband's popularity (no matter what he did to help them) when he was in office. We're talking about something different now, something . . . sexist………
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
printpolitico Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. bingo
If women are to overcome this dark cloud that is looming above they are going to have to band together much as did the black community and fight for the right to fair pay and
fair scrutiny and most importantly equal rights within the sub conscious of the worlds male community. You have many women who stand up for their rights and fight. But you have two other groups that hurt the fight for equality. The first is the religious community that takes the Bible out of context and say if you are female you are to be sub servant to the man. That is
if you read that verse without reading it in it's entirety and taking the entire Bible's contents as they are meant to be read. The second is the group of women who are afraid to stand up to their
men, for whatever, personal reason they may have.

Sounds silly, but watch a show like survivor when the women have a chance to vote off the last man standing and go unified into a final four, they almost always let the
guy manipulate them into keeping him and he ultimately wins.

It is time we unify and take a stand. Hillary is a strong woman but even she sometimes seems afraid to enter those open doors Obama gives her in the debate. ( don't get
me wrong I understand she doesn't know which way to turn because the media spins it. But I say go for it and see where it takes you.)
Then watch Obama. He radiates arrogance. Some might see this as strength but this is a turn off in much the same way as GW Bush. But even Bush didn't exude this kind of arrogance because of his bumbling nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. There is another group--who take things for granted--the rights many early
worked for, died for.

the 8 hr shift. workplace safty, child labor rights in early 19th c.the list goes on.

birth control, ect ect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. You have some good ideas but let's not lose them in
don't want to talk about Hillary/Obama... let's talk about changing the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. No it isn't.
The deal was an inside job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Sexism has played a role--i do not agree it is primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
88. But sexism, whether nuanced or overt, plays a part in a lot of things.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 09:19 PM by Old Crusoe
There is also, for example, reverse sexism.

And racism.

And agism. Mike Gravel, in the 07-08 nomination race, is a hell of a smart guy, incidentally closer to Edwards and Kucinich on the issues than to either Obama or Clinton. He's a white male. If sexism (or racism) were the force the OP is suggesting, Gravel would be well ahead of the two frontrunners. White males own the joint, right? But Gravel is too anti-corporate and too "old" for some tastes. Not for mine, maybe, but I'm only 1 of 300 million U.S. citizens. And I've been known to be esoterically liberal.

There are anonymous women who suffer the genuine wounds of sexism. Virtually none of them is running for president. Posts on DU, IMO, which cast Sen. Clinton as a "victim" of sexism, are not persuasive. All women may theoretically be in the path of that storm but some of them take a far more direct hit from the twister than an Ivy League attorney/Former First Lady/2-term Senator/and wealthy citizen like Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
53. Be my guest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
55. It fucking well pisses me off.
She's a politician. Obama went dirty when he said she was "likeable enough" but nobody called him any dirty words which refer to the color of his skin.

I've alerted on every asshole I've seen post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
56.  Let's focus on what do we want to do next...
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:17 PM by cap
Forget the Hillary/Obama primary.
My ideas are:

1. Remove the glass ceiling: Given the large number of boomer women in the ranks, there is no reason why women are not 50-50. They've had their kids... so kids arent an issue

2. End the discriminatory layoffs...

3. Provide mentoring for junior women so that they can identify when they are being tracked into areas that will not lead to promotion/pay increases. It's their choice if they dont want to do this.

4. Encourage women to think of themselves as breadwinners and take on extra responsiblity and pay. I find a lot of women in service related industries will stay as a customer service rep/cashier etc. and not ask for pay.

5. Provide Daddy time and force men to take it. Men should be doing their share of the work of child care and taking care of their own relatives when they grow old. No one should be penalized for doing this. Actually, people who don't take an appropriate amount of time off for their kids should be socially ostracized. This time off should reasonably accomodate parental responsiblities.

5. Identify culturally appropriate ways for women to express strength without turning into an automaton. Identify culturally appropriate ways for women to express power. These should be the same as those for men. Identify culturally appropriate ways of talking about women in power.

6. Identify stereotypical means of denying women access to power in our society.

7. Prepare for women leadership in the community.

This is the intent of my post.... I dont want to hear another word about Hillary/Obama. I want to hear suggestions of what we want as a society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. I'm alerting the mods on some of this...
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:24 PM by cap
Let's get back on the subject. If I cant get this thread back on subject, I will ask the mods to shut it down. There are a lot of other threads for people to discuss Hillary/Obama primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
80. Do not give the obnoxious fuckers the power to shut your thread down.
Ignore the trolls.

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
63. Thank you! I'm for Obama, too, but the reflexive sexism against Clinton is appalling
I never quit being an old style, radical feminist dude. Me and Phil Donohue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
65. This Saturday is International Women's Day.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:49 PM by Beacool
If this past election season has taught us anything, is that we may proclaim to be very progressive in this country but in reality we are a backward nation when it comes to true equality among the sexes.

Hillary has been trashed by the MSM and by too many others based on her gender and not her stance on the issues. The endless wasted hours of air time and inches of print on subjects such as: her hair, age, weight, cleavage, laughter (cackle), voice (shrill), marital problems, sexual desirability (or not), etc.; have left a very bad taste in my mouth and that of countless other women.

This Saturday I will have very little to celebrate..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
69. The number one issue for women that needs to be addressed is health care/insurance.
Getting insurance, keeping insurance, or living without is the number one issue for women from 0 -65. If we have universal health care women will be able to make different and better decisions.

For instance, my older sister can not retire until she reaches 65 when medicare kicks in because it is her job that pays the $700 monthly insurance premium for herself and her husband. Meanwhile, she leaves work every day and goes to visit my parents - Mother in a special needs unit (Alzheimer's) and Father living semi-independent in the same facility. My sister stops to buy the groceries for my Dad, pays the bills, talks to both their doctors, takes time off from work to take them to appointments, prepares their tax returns, does their laundry, fights battles with the pharmacy over double billing, etc. etc. etc. She spends 30-40 hours a week addressing their needs. When she gets a few days vacation built up she takes time off to fly to Chicago or D.C. in order to baby set her grandchildren so that her stressed out children can get away for a few days with their spouses. She never complains but she needs to retire because it is too much for her. BTW, when she goes to take care of her grandchildren I take time off from work to fly across the country and take care of my parents. I need to retire also but can't until medicare kicks in.

This is a long story to point out that universal health care is the one thing that will positively change women's lives to the greatest degree. I don't see where this is Obama's passion but I know that it is Hillary's. In the AARP debate Hillary talked about the squeeze on women (like my sister) who are caring for their parents and their children in this way. She wants to change social security so that women providing care can retire earlier without being penalizing on their SS benefits and, of course, universal health care takes care of the issue of working only to retain health insurance. Obama chose not to attend the AARP debate. Universal health care needs to be the passion of every feminist and every Democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #69
82. Your right about health care
and I think we have to bring back the working wage and an 8 hour day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
70. Hillary even seemed to think it was cool to call herself a "bitch"..
at least that was implied with her overt happiness with all of the SNL skits. "Bitch is the new black".. certainly didn't seem to have any complaints from the Clinton campaign.

I guess it's OK if it's in a positive context, but not OK if it's in a negative one? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
72. I'm a woman. I've been called bitch.
I've always rather taken it as a compliment. I prefer ball-buster though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. Good one!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
83. I'd like her to be a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
84. Hillary says she's not a bitch and I take her at her word
Is she a bitch? Of course not. As far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #84
98. back to the original post: what are we going to do for the next wave of feminism...
I think we need to concentrate on developing a farm system rather than gloaming on a candidate's personality or lack there of.

There are a lot of women who really dint like the word bitch. Just as African Americans have moved on from the word "colored" or "nigger" can't we have our wishes heard? that we just don't like the word used? Yes the are African Americans who use the word nigger between themselves but non-African Americans generally stay away from that word out of respect for other people's sensitivities.

At any rate, back to the intent of the original post, how must feminism change so that we can deal with some of these issues? Who here wants to change it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
85. I'll just call her a rat bastard from now on
Just like I do every other corrupt lying rat bastard in the country. Better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #85
92. LOL
thats more like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
90. I never thought I would be on the wave, but since NH, I've been riding the tidal wave. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
91. i am voting obama and i sure will yell about the seism shit too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
99. I think she should own the bitch label. I don't mind being called a bitch. That said, sexism sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #99
100. i ahd a 15 yr old tell me being called a whore was ok because it just doesnt mean
the same thing anymore.

i told her that was bullshit.

then i thought how a couple decades ago being called a bitch was pretty nasty, but now a days, us women. .... we are just owning it.

i wonder today, if this si what we want.

anyway, not important to this thread or your post necessarily, was just thinking about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
101. It doesn't surprise me that we've ended up with the two most easily demonized Demo candidates.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:55 AM by Peake
Who would the Republican strategists want to be our choices? Those most easily demonized and used to create argument and division. I posted about this a while ago and it seems to be coming true. If WE use these differences amongst ourselves, it will be even easier for the swift boaters come November.

Divide and conquer. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC