Zueda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:54 AM
Original message |
The ball is in your court now Hillary... |
wndycty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Yes, there is now a higher standard. . . |
|
. . .don't be too surprised if some of the Clinton camp's off the record statements become public soon.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Forget "off the record" statements. He called Obama "Ken Starr"! HE should resign. n/t |
Mooney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. He should never resign |
|
I want him to stay in and say ludicrous, demonstrably false bullshit forever, since it's doing her no favors whatsoever. I hope she keeps Mark Penn on too.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
it looks like his Rovian tactics are working. You'd think Dems. wouldn't fall for them but they are.
|
Mooney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
26. I don't think they're working at all. |
|
The results of Tuesday's elections were exactly what everyone said they would be all along. Obama would carry Vermont by a large margin, Clinton would carry Rhode Island by a large margin, and Obama would close the gaps in Texas and Ohio and keep it close. This is exactly what happened, an if the Texas victory goes to Obama because of the caucus, and even if it gets no media coverage whatsoever, that dampens Hillary's newfound "mo" considerably. Not that she got much to begin with.
Any "mo" that she might have picked up is already gone. We're in a new news cycle, and at best, it now looks like a statistical tie between her and Obama. That was the best she and her Rovian tactics could do. And needless to say, Obama still has the lead in delegates, number of states won, and popular vote. She didn't make a dent. And she's not going to.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
he talked about imitating Ken Starr's tactics.
That's not the same as calling someone a monster.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Invoking Ken Starr's name re: Obama's "tactics" is worse in Dem. circles than calling someone a |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
and I don't see why you're so bugged. People HERE bring up Ken STarr issues against Clinton every day - I don't you see you objecting.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
and I'M not working for anyone's campaign. Can you show me a thread about Ken Starr here before yesterday? TIA.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. You seriously are claiming |
|
not to have any seen any threads about Whitewater, Rose Law Firm records, Monica Lewinsky?
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Yup. Can you show me a thread about Ken Starr issues? Thanks again. |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:26 PM by jenmito
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. I didn't say threads about Ken Starr |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. I edited it (BEFORE I saw your comment) to "Ken Starr ISSUES." TIA. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
just do a search for "Lewinsky", "Rose Law" or "Whitewater".
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Nah. I'm not going to waste my time searching to back up YOUR claim. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
IF you think nobody's mentioned Whitewater, Rose Law Firm or Monica Lewinsky here, you're either ignorant or lying.
|
Mooney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
27. Monsters don't exist. |
|
Ken Starr does. So technically speaking, the Ken Starr comment was more off base. If HRC has her feelings hurt because someone compared her to Count Chocula, then she needs a thicker skin.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Video here from inside the ClintonInc Camp - |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I wouldn't be surprised. :hi:
|
ellacott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message |
8. She will just continue to play the victim |
|
I'm waiting on future skits from SNL. I wonder what she'll do if they turn the tables on her.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. I agree. I REALLY hope Obama talks to SNL, like he said, |
|
he has to "have a word" with Tina Fey, saying he never met her (but seems to PLAN to). I really hope SNL won't continue favoring Hillary so much when she's playing so dirty.
|
ellacott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. She's providing them with a lot of material |
|
It's sad that she has to use a skit on SNL as an endorsement.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Yes she is. But they keep portraying her in a positive light or as a victim |
|
while portraying Obama as an empty suit.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
18. The phone rings at 3 AM and she whines... |
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Yes - Woflson needs to go! n/t |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
20. republicans and hillary just cry for it. they never do it. n.t |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. hillary supporters does not hold hillary to any ethical standards so she doesnt need to |
|
stay true to her word. she has never given her word. her supporters like that, better for dirty politics.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |