Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The respected reason to oppose Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:52 PM
Original message
The respected reason to oppose Hillary
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:54 PM by quinnox
I see a lot of angry threads posted by people who are upset at Hillary mainly for one reason, her vote for the Iraq war.

And I respect them.

IMHO, this is the most respectable and principled reason to oppose her and I can understand this point of view.

On most other issues Hillary is very strong and basically a liberal (though carefully done in disguise to make her acceptable for a broader group than just liberals)

I am one Hillary supporter who has never defended her on this point of her war vote, and agree it was a terrible mistake. No, there is no wiggle room here, she made a big blunder on this vote.

WAs it bad enough to completely disqualify her from the presidency, I don't think so personally, but I can see how some could feel yes, it was.

So now it remains to be seen if this vote will cost her the nomination.

I think this is a major factor in her having the passionate opposition and Obama's rise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is only one of many, many reasons for me
going back to before Bill was President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. indeed it is the only reason to reject her - other than sexism and GOP slogans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, there's also the nasty campaign...
Her vote for NCLB...

Her vote for the bankruptcy bill...

Her attacks on the first amendment...

The nepotism...

Her cozying up to Republicans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Don't let the fact that BCCI thug Jackson Stephens, who GROOMED the Clintons' political careers
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 01:25 PM by blm
to serve his agenda and continue to protect BushInc while wearing donkey masks, would effect how Democratic citizens should feel about the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I know BCCI - and the arab princes, and Bert Lance as I saw the orginal events unfold - and
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 01:46 PM by papau
Clinton was not in any of that to my knowledge (granted I have no BCCI knowledge).

American Bank was "our" Bank - I think if the Clinton's were in the loop I'd have heard about it.

"Our" refers to Olmstead (Ike and Reagan's buddy), the CIA, and Bert Lance's "investment group" - plus the Chevy Chase folks as the opposition within the game - other than Bert it had no other Democrat in a power position that were known to me - and I was the token socialist that Olmstead allowed to hang around for a few years because I made him a lot of money in his insurance operations. I did not know these people as "BCCI" - just as "investors".

Jackson Stephens has NSA comnnections (don't we all?) - is a Democrat from Ark - and a domestic campaign contributor to both George Bush Senior and Bill Clinton - the G W Bush connection is based on giving money to golf causes (it is hard to believe the fights over membership at golf clubs and eating clubs).

The word "groomed" is over the top - but he was a contributor to Clinton.

As for BCCI and Jackson Stephens, I have no first hand or second had or even bathroom rumor information - I have seen the reports - but I suspect those folks giving those reports can document about the same amount that I can (which is near zero except for the FDIC/SEC/Treasury public documents - if they still exist).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You know one SMALL PART. And the reason you DON'T know much about Stephens is BECAUSE
Bill Clinton made sure all of that was downplayed and deep-sixed throughout the 90s.

He respects YOU so much as a citizen that he didn't write one word about BCCI matters in his book. THAT is how much YOU are respected as a citizen, papau. YOU didn't DESERBVE to know one thing about how Bill dealt with BCCI matters and the thugs involved.

YOU don't care and don't care if the protection of BushInc continues as long as your 'favorite team' wins.

The gamers have taken over government and closed it down to responsible citizens who actually CARED about keeping government accountable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think it disqualifies her
and should she get the nomination, I'll vote for her just like I voted for Kerry in 04. She's a better choice than McCain.

But in the primaries I can't support her. Can't do it. nope. With her vote for the AUMF she lost mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:59 PM
Original message
If she would have gone the John Edwards route on this
she could have shut me up long ago. But the IWR vote continues to cripple her in my mind. For me, she was already stumbling out of the starting gates with this albatross around her neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
death to the DLC Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. nice, reasoned post
and it was my one true reason for never supporting her, until the past few weeks. Now there are a few more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC