berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:33 PM
Original message |
Democratic Presidential Primary 2008 Reality |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 03:28 PM by berni_mccoy
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. May as well color in Wyoming purple while you're at it |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Clinton wins the deep south west and states around NY |
|
Ohio is an interesting one and we will see what happens in Penn. I didn't know there were so many latte drinking elitists in the midwest. I never noticed it when I lived in MN, Iowa, MS and WI.
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Deep South? LA, AL, GA, SC and TX all went Obama my friend. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 03:11 PM by berni_mccoy
The only Deep South state that didn't is FL
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. dmordue said "deep south west" |
|
A more useful analysis is that Clinton won Democrats in the New West while Obama won in the Old West. Clinton is winning the bigger states with more organized party operations. Obama seems to do slightly better in places where being a Democrat has been a bigger frustration and in flyover country. Of course both enjoy regional advantages (Obama in IL, WI, Minn; Clinton in NY, Ark, Okla.) Beyond that, I don't see a trend. These truly are national campaigns in scope.
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. Sorry, missed that... thought he meant, deep south, west. You are correct. |
|
Remember, this is a primary comparison, meant to show strength of wins.
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
6. great what is the link? |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. man I must be blind but I still don't see it |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Sorry, posted wrong link... correct one here: |
lewis_in_fw
(75 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
8. This is a PRIMARY Map or a Caucus/Primary Map? *NT* |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. It's who won the state by what margin... both caucus and primary. |
lewis_in_fw
(75 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Oh....So Democratic Presidential Primary & Caucus Map. Thanks *NT* |
lewis_in_fw
(75 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Not a good measure. Doesn't factor in population of states. *NT* |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Obama is winning popular vote: 13,000,655 to 12,411,705 |
Medusa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Ahead in the delegate count too |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. *snicker* We really must stop throwing facts up in the Clinton-supporters faces |
|
It's so painful for them to confront reality.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |