Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-13-08 08:14 PM
Original message |
Passive Agressive partisanship (tactical concern) is fascinating to watch. |
|
Isn't it interesting that every single right wing rumor and attempt at smearing Barack Obama is followed with a flood of posts from people on DU who are so "concerned" about it that they feel they have to repeat everything ad nauseum.
Do people really think we are so stupid that we can't see what they are really trying to do? It's not about concern....it's about actively trying to destroy Obama and plant doubts in the minds of the undecided while pretending to be "just looking out for the good of the party"?
It smacks of that "some people say" tactic and is so transparent and really, it's embarrassing to watch.
|
catgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-13-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-13-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's cyberbullying is what it is. |
|
I don't suppose we could talk the mods, Skinner & co. into tracking these jerks down and giving them a tombstone complete with an IP ban...
|
zalinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-13-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. BTW, it is also happening to the Clinton team. n/t |
bellasgrams
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-13-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think it is relevant. BO's team would be attacking Hillary |
|
unmercifully if the situation was reversed and you know it. I don't want Farrakhan and his ilk to have any association with the running of the country.
|
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-13-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Farrakhan and his ilk? What exactly are you driving at? |
|
Inquiring minds want to know.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |