Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I dont see what was so bad about what Rev Wright said.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:55 AM
Original message
I dont see what was so bad about what Rev Wright said.
He was obviously coming from a place of injustice and inequality. He chose some poor words. People exaggerate to make a point. The United States isnt perfect, fucking far from it. Is it wrong to criticize that? We all know what he was talking about behind his choice of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. So are you saying Obama should have defended him?
I understand there's confusion in the ranks. Obama rejected those words of his, and actually scrubbed Wright from his web site. Some of his supporters are defending those words, and Wright. So, who's "right"? I can't keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Obama did exactly the right thing - he denounced the words, not the man.
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 11:23 AM by backscatter712
Wright's a perfectly decent person.

Obama rejected and denounced the hurtful words Wright said in that sermon. It's just those words that needed to be spoken up against. Not Wright, and not the real message Wright's trying to send, that's now being drowned by swiftboating.

I believe that Wright speaks truth - there's a huge amount of injustice in this country, perpetuated in large part by rich white people upon the rest of us, and especially upon the black community. It's just that those particular words that Wright used that day aren't a good way to voice the well-deserved outrage that should be said about the way things are in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. GEE---BO just SCRUBBED his website of Wright- Now why??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Personal assults are not allowed.


Prolly so he dosent have to hear from mainstream fools like yourself

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was stupid for Barack to stay in that church 20 years

knowing he was going to run for POTUS
For the simple fact that republicans will burry him with it. It shows poor political judgement. Oprah had the sense to leave years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Which lends to his statements that he didn't know ALL of the inflamatory sermons Wright did. People
...don't live at church
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. He said he knew of the inflammatory comments when he decided to run--yet he
did nothing!--until now.

Very poor judgment on his part.
did you see the new Rass. poll in DU--take a look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. as opposed to all the stuff
the republics will bury HRC with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hubby and I are in agreement. We think angry black men are not allowed to speak truth
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 11:02 AM by mnhtnbb
in this country. Look what happened to Dean and Edwards--angry white men. For God's sake, with the exception of the AIDS comment, I think Wright was correct.

I'm not an Obama fan to begin with, and he would have gained in my estimation if he had taken the truth
of what Wright said and supported it. The fact that he's dumping Wright instead contributes to my sense
that he's just another politician--not St. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. You're in the 8% that have a favorable view of Reverend Wright.
Just 8% Have Favorable Opinion of Pastor Jeremiah Wright

Pastor Jeremiah Wright, who has become part of the national political dialogue in recent days, is viewed favorably by 8% of voters nationwide. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 58% have an unfavorable view of the Pastor whose controversial comments have created new challenges for Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign.

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/people2/just_8_have_favorable_opinion_of_pastor_jeremiah_wright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Im proud to be in the 8%
But as Mark Thomas said on the radio last week, "People aren't ready to hear it yet."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. He Should Have Said It "Nicer"
like an evangelical white church pastor does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. People don't like the WAY it was said...Wright vs. Rod Palsley Wright is a saint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Some things weren't so bad, others were pretty bad.
Choosing to make his comments about 9/11 while the ruins were still smoking was callous. Criticizing Bill Clinton about his policies and they effected the AA community is fine, but saying that he screwed black people like he screwed Monica is just crass and is a piss poor way of framing it. His comments about Hollowell sucked and so did his remarks about Hillary. She may never have been called a n***er but she sure has been called a c**t. And sorry, that's not any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Thing is
re 9/11, he was speaking about blowback. I thought the same things at the time, that very same fucking day, but never said a thing because no one here or anywhere else had seemed to agree with that thought. I am as guilty as he, as are a few dozen other humans out there who thought the same verboten things. Smoking ruins or not, some people are more tactful than others. Some preachers are paid according to their lack of tact. It would have never been news except that Obama is now running. Are we all truly satisfied now that all was on the up 'n' up vis a vis the 9/11 stuff?

As to the rest: well i'm tempted to call Hil'n'Bill a few choice things, but I will never utter them in public.

Cali, you've freaked many partisans out over the last few months. I am gratified that you are someone whose insights were informative and important enough to respond to, even if I disagreed. I agree as much as I disagree and Thank you.


PS: I am from IL, and my sister has been telling me all about Obama since he was their legislator. It is no surprise to me that he is running for this post. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. He makes no proclamation on high about what he intends to do: he tends to look at all sides and attempt to find common ground. I think that is what we all desire in a pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wright, like many with similar preaching styles, are masters of hyperbole
that doesn't go over well with lots of people. That is the real issue. Seen a few things where African-Americans are offended that others are offended by Wright. Others are claiming yet another use of the race card. I am not sure I care. I tend to think it was more her church than his.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. It's not what he said...It's how he said it...
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 11:47 AM by Jeff In Milwaukee
You see, America likes its negroes to be smiling and deferential to white authority. So while what Rev. Wright said was technically correct, he said it in a way that was far too uppity to his white masters.

Advice to Black America: Keep grinning and shuffling, lest your betters take offense.



P.S. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC