Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: Great Speech, Won't Matter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:53 AM
Original message
Obama: Great Speech, Won't Matter
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/stumped/2008/03/obama_great_speech_wont_matter_1.html

excerpt:

With every passing contest, his ability to be all things to all voters frays a little more, and of course the recent controversy over his close ties to preacher Jeremiah Wright has come close to accomplishing what Bill Clinton so clumsily tried to do before the South Carolina primary: For the first time, Obama risks being identified with that strain of grievance-nursing, embittered African-American political tradition that many white blue-collar Democratic voters find so off-putting.

It's been a great week, in other words, for Hillary Clinton. No matter how many superlatives pundits and intellectuals deploy in describing Obama's nuanced discourse on race, it's never a good week for Obama when he is forced to define himself as a candidate who is all about race.

He was eloquent and thoughtful in talking about race relations in America, but the entire exercise still ended up feeling a bit evasive. What prompted the speech, after all, were pointed questions about why Obama would befriend a pastor who preached a message of bitter division and anti-Americanism. Obama didn't squarely address that issue. It was the equivalent of responding to a missed date with your girlfriend with a sweeping disquisition on the history of the relations between the sexes.

Obama's speech got a big thumbs up from the intelligentsia. (I never know if I am one of them ... but a columnist can aspire!) I suspect, however, that it will get a big thumbs down from blue-collar white voters in Pennsylvania. College students may well be reading Obama's speech years from now in U.S. history textbooks, and discussing its structure and nuance in class. But I don't think the speech will do Obama much good with voters in 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Psst... Richardson is giving his endorsement right now, tying
Directly to the speech and race relations/coming together :)

It's already spreading, and it's viral. Hope. Change. Unity. This is what Progressives have been screaming for, if only you (general you) could open your eyes and recognize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:58 AM
Original message
THIS speech...wow. Following Obama's, this could indeed be a movement
of epic proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The question is, would Obama's grandmother be scared
if she saw Richardson walking down the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Obama is blowing the perfect setup given him by Richardson..
He's back on the race thing again. MSM cutting away before he shoots the rest of his toes off on Nat'l tv..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Grapes are really sour for you this week, aren't they?
Why don't you go back to Hillis44 & their infected site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Theres no sour grapes..
Or is that your perception of what is IS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Richardson thinks being Gay is a choice. The Logo Channel interviewer asked him TWICE
and he gave that wrong ass answer 2 times.

His campaign folks corrected it for him like a day later.

Richardson's light dimmed a significant amount for me after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. are you saying this is a matter of 'talking to people who won't listen'?...
One and out is not a path for change....

I imagine Barack will continue to attempt to advance discussion...and who knows...

maybe, even just one at a time, some deaf ears will start to hear...

also, it is at best presumptive to assume the speech was only appreciated by the 'intelligentsia'...sound like freeper analysis from here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. actually it's political analysis....
we forget sometimes that this is a POLITICAL race... filled with POLITICS and POLITICAL ANALYSIS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Read the comments: "you've got it wrong regarding Obama's speech"


Stumped,

I'm generally a fan of your work, but you've got it wrong regarding Obama's speech.

You claim that Obama didn't "squarely address the issue", but in fact he did. It's just that his answer can't be easily shrink-wrapped into a sound-bite or a headline. Listen to the speech, read the transcript. His argument is essentially that the issue is too complex to have, pardon the pun, a black and white answer that can be easily digested. He embraced the good in Rev. Wright without vilifying the bad. To me, this is exactly the kind of carefully considered, honest position that I want to see my leaders take on all complicated issues.

Consider for example, the WaPo editorial proclaiming that the Democratic candidates 'just don't get it' regarding Iraq. You want nuance and profound understanding regarding Iraq, but not race? What about health care? The economy?

Instead of filtering the complex and difficult issues facing the nation down to their most divisive and diametrically opposed parts, the role of the media should be to inform the electorate and challenge them to understand their world in more than single sentences, factiods and yes/no answers. Instead, you're encouraging the candidates give us all the easy way out, the Cliff Notes version, which does a great disservice to the democratic process and the nation at large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. link?
even if you are referring to the OP, you should specify...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was evasive and slick -- like Obama
Turning out poor grandma, slyly equating Ferraro with his mentor pastor Wright. The whole speech was a design in saving Obama's ass -- disguised with the usual Obama fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. will you ever get over the ass-kicking that Obama has given Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. We'll see who gets what -- I happen to be able to see through the charlatan Obama
Will you ever develop insight to see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Will you be able to get over the ass-kicking she'll give to Obama in PA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Will you be able to get over the fact that it won't matter?
Basic math is your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Haha, superdelegates will be Hillary's friends; redo your math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. is that why they're all rallying to her side now?
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 12:51 PM by JackORoses
oh...you mean they aren't?
Damn the luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Just sit back and watch; Clinton has the moementum now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I think you mean Joementum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
35.  Take a good look at the last five days of that Reuters graph... really.
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 01:40 PM by barb162
It's on a current thread; Hillary reading Obama by a few points 3-16-08/ 3-20-08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. Yeah, let's put the nomination on polls
How about the nom goes to the candidate that has more votes and pledged delegates. The smarter candidate, the better candidate. The one that has risen despite 350 years of experience and name recognition for his opponent, and an unbelievably huge political machine, replete with thousands of max donors, and an adoring media, at least since the Wisconsin blowout. But, yeah, we'll just call this race for Hil based on Reuters and Gallup small sample polls that fluctuate daily. I'm all for hearing with the remaining 8 states and PR and Guam have to say- I just am tired of all the petty, typical Clinton kitchen sink campaigning that has daily garbage to fling at Obama. It is for that reason that I would like to see this thing end ASAP. Obama will win, and it will be legal and backed by the majority of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I have news for you, this will be over before PA.
Enjoy those polls, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. which is it to be?
Ass kicking?

Or unity?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. after Hillary has had enough ass-kicking, she will withdraw
and the Democratic Party will unite around its Nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. hmmmm
So we achieve "unity" by kicking the asses of those who don't agree with us.

This sounds more like "enforced conformity" than "unity" to me.

"Unite or else."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. we kick the asses of those who threaten Party Unity
Hillary has betrayed the Democratic Party.
She will get what she deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. the problem with "hope"
It is not very well spelled out just what it is we are supposed to be hoping for.

Apparently, we are to hope for the destruction of those who disagree with us.

We will dash the hopes of all who refuse to hope along with us.

Those who disagree with us are hurting our unity, so they will be de-unitized.

All who refuse to be unitized, will be excluded from the unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. No, just Hillary. Anyone else is welcome to join the Party.
C'mon in the water's warm!
and this time it's not not from Hillary pissing on our Parade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. disingenous and hostile
All are welcome on your terms. That is the opposite of "all are welcome" and the opposite of "unity."

"Our" parade? Am I pissing on "our" parade? "Our" really means "your," and it is disingenuous, just as your "all are welcome" message is.

In would love to hear just what this parade is about. Obama supporters are claiming that it is the ultimate opposition to the DLC, to corporate Dems, to spineless Dems, to triangulating Dems. If that were true, should not leftists and radicals and Edwards and Kucinich supporters, and anti-capitalist and anti-corporate people such as myself be able to detect that? Shouldn't you be able to communicate that to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. sad for you that your ears are so stopped up by hate
it's like a perverse alchemy. And tough shit that the speeh has mattered and that Richardson is endorsing him. Stick a fork in hilly she's so done. She's so last century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. You are the one talking about sticking forks in people
and I am affected by hate?

It seems you've transmuted your own hate into projection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. It's not hate to
have an opinion about someone that is different than yours.

"I might be skinny, but I'm tough." -- Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. yeah
I just HATE people whose ears are stopped up by hate. Stick a fork in them!!!

Tough shit to them! We are building unity, and if they won't get on the program we will throw them out! People who don't "get" unity don't deserve to share our "unity." Purge the unity movement of all who dare question it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. oh and here's your pony...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. right
And I have a damned good idea that we are slated to shovel up all of that manure, too, before this thing is over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoRonin Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. What's with the poor Grandma stuff?
I don't understand this whole "throwing Grandma under the bus thing". Nothing in Obama's words felt disrespectful towards his grandmother, in my opinion. He seem to acknowledge that she was a human being with some flawed notions.

Let me guess, you apparently have no friends or relatives who ever say anything you find repugnant or hold beliefs you disagree with, huh? You must walk on water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow..I have lain awake nights..worried about what "stumped" thought..
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 12:05 PM by SoCalDem
whew!! Thanks for the fish, stumped :)

your opinion is one of millions out here on the internet(s)..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Stumped is pretty accurate
Another word for the blog is "clueless."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's not a great speech and it will matter as a failed attempt to stem Obama's losses.
It was an attempt to deflect Obama's campaign trainwreck over his relationship with Wright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. In other words, a lofty cover your ass speech that is seen as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. The speech won't have an impact but the piling on by the media will
My neighbors who are mostly middle of the road uncommitted are getting pissed off on picking on a guy for what his pastor says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. If Hillary was running against Martin Luther King Jr...
her shills (or Freepers stirring the shit) would be calling the I Have A Dream speech "pie-in-the-sky fantasy", they'd be attacking him with guilt-by-association smears and accusing him of being buddies with Malcolm X, and bashing him because he's "demanding that negroes get special rights."

Seriously! Look at yourselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Andrés Martinez, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation"
DLC... "centrist" ... Third Way stink-tank. Other fellows include Christine Todd Whitman (GOP, former Governor of New Jersey, EPA head under Cheney/Bush, and Nixon/Rumsfeld protege in the 70s) and Francis Fukuyama (conservative 'philosopher' and historian).

Just more stench from the anchovies of the American Pie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. This says different
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. Those must be some really sour grapes. You might want to take them back.
In case you missed it, his speech already is working, and the whole passport-gate thing... that's just gonna move pastor wright right along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. passportgate is a non story. It's SOP it seems for all three candidates...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wowimthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. Is the Washington Post still credible? Youtube, at this point has more credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wowimthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. If you think the Piling on will work, guess again... Huffingtonpost has a McCain endorsed pastor...
on it's front page. The media doesn't know what can of worms they've opened. These stories will start to paint all pastors in a kind of light that will minimize the damage to Obama. It's starting now.

Stop paying attention to the MSM. They are three steps behind the blogs. Wright won't last for another month. Why? Because the sermons of many pastors will start to creep out. Even Hillary's faith with her "Fellowship" will be fodder for the media pretty soon.

The media is the arm of the right wing. Piling on Obama will spray a light on every pastor who ever preached to the candidates. It's starting already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. I'm just showing you some political analysis
take it for what you believe that it is worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC