The Night Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:38 PM
Original message |
A counteroffensive to Operation Let It Sink... |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 01:40 PM by The Night Owl
If you are, like me, someone who is offended by efforts to silence dialogue at DU, then post a response to all responses titled Let It Sink. Let us use Let it Sink against the very people who are using it against DU.
|
ulysses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. how is making a choice not to respond to something silencing dialogue? |
|
And where's this "dialogue" thing you speak of, anyway?
|
The Night Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. If you don't want to respond to something, then don't. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 01:43 PM by The Night Owl
If you don't want to respond to something, then don't. I'm against the Let It Sink tactic because it is an effort to coerce people into being silent.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. It's not coercion to remind people not to post reactive, useless junk. |
panader0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Operation "Let it Rise"? |
|
Operation "Let it Stink"? "Let it Be"?
|
maddiejoan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
13. Just post a picture of Maya Angelou |
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. What if we just pretend to let it sink? |
|
Like right now. I am pretending to ignore you. Would that work for you?
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Someone choosing not to participate isn't shutting anything down. |
|
You can still post anything you want, wherever you want, when you want. Just because some don't want to engage doesn't equate to silencing dialog. You posted this, didn't you? You're not silenced...no one is silenced. :shrug:
|
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
17. The plethora of posts attempting to *organize* people into not responding to threads |
|
is counterproductive to the entire point of this board.
It's also kind of juvenile.
Of course, that's jmho. I also think "ignore" is stupid. I can ignore people manually, I don't need no stinking button. :)
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. I don't totally disagree. |
|
It's not my style, but it's not silencing anything as the OP suggests.
I can ignore people manually, I don't need no stinking button.
Great minds think alike. :rofl:
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Operation Stink It Up. |
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Call your counteroffensive "Let It Stink". |
DemGa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
8. They are playing passive aggressive like their mentor Obama |
|
Insulting people as they attempt to "righteously" shut them out. Some very corrupted and slick stuff indeed.
|
cbayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Could you explain your idea a little more? |
|
The purpose of the Let It Sink campaign is not clear.
The stated purpose is to let Obama bashing threads sink by not participating. I'm ok with that and wish both sides would let those go.
What I actually see is that pretty much any pro-Hillary thread is subjected to the Let It Sink ploy and the mass ignore policy. This reminds me of Bush tactics - only let yourself hear what supports your position. This I not only object to but am concerned about.
So I am not sure what it is you are proposing.
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This seems like a selfish post IMO.
|
mudesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
GoldieAZ49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Umm so those ignoring the Fox News-type threads are going against DU? |
|
Gawd, what has this place come to?
|
The Night Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
24. As I've already pointed out, I don't have a problem with people ignoring threads. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 02:57 PM by The Night Owl
As I've already pointed out, I don't have a problem with people ignoring threads. What I have a problem with is people tagging threads with this Let It Sink bullshit in an effort to make people feel like they're doing something wrong by responding to something they want to respond to.
|
seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I find it funny how many Obama supporters are so quick to refute the cult |
|
stereotype while they are so quick to jump on a bandwagon.:rofl:
|
GarbagemanLB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. I find it ironic that an Obama critic has a peace symbol. I sure hope you aren't supporting Hillary. |
seaglass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Not sure what Obama has to do with peace but I'll vote for |
|
either, supporting neither :-)
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
21. idiot post of the day n/t |
Honeycombe8
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
23. How 'bout just posting posts that are substantive & discuss instead of insulting? |
|
That would be a novel idea, for some. It would even be EASIER, too! Unless, of course, a poster's whole goal is to repetitively inflame and insult. In which case, the "Let it Sink" tactic is justified, and there would no counter offensive to it that also fits the goal of repetitive inflaming and insulting.
|
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
25. I have an idea -- post yet another 1000 threads about Jeremiah Wright. That would show 'em! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |