CNN.com Veepstakes Round 4 results

[spooky3]

Who do you think John Kerry is most likely to pick as his
running mate? Vote
now in the next round!
http://www.cnn.com/veepstakes/

RESULTS

SOUTHERN-SHOWDOWN STATES BRACKET
John Edwards (74%) defeats Bill Richardson (26%)

GRAVITAS-WOMEN'S BRACKET
Wesley Clark (69%) defeats Hillary Clinton (31%)

[LuLu550]

1. just voted for Wes in round 4

Go Wes!

[Rowdyboy]

2. Everybody vote

Make your thoughts known!

[quinnox]

3. So it is down to Clark vs. Edwards

An expected final. I would put my money on Edwards winning. (in this CNN vp game, don't know what will happen in reality)

[Darkamber]

4. Exactly as expected...I voted Edwards...

By the way, I want Clark for Sec. of State. I want him in a position where he can really use his skills and that isn't the VP.

As for Edwards...give the war 3 more months and see what other ugly details come out. See how people start to feel. Personally, whenever I think of it I feel sick and depressed. I believe that the only thing that can save America's imagine is to remove Bush and company from the White house.

We will need a voice of hope and optimism...something to help us look forward. Edwards voice would help Kerry give us that hope.

Clark is needed to mend relations with other nations. We need him where he can help most. I just can't see him dealing with the lawyer speak of the Senate and house and doing fund raisers. I can see him talking with Foreign leaders and working on our relations around the world.

Edwards for VP and Clark for Sec. of State.

[in_cog_ni_to]

5. I voted!

For guess who? :7 Come on Clarkies! Get in your vote for Wes! WOO HOO!

Go Wes! :bounce::loveya:

[bloodyjack]

6. when the heck was HILLARY CLINTON entered into the equation

good GAWD that's just retarded

[Scoopie]

7. What has surprised me

is the people Wes has had to beat to get there: both Clintons and John McCain.
No one else has had it nearly this hard!

Go Wes!!

[bloodyjack]

8. BILL CLINTON? HILLARY CLINTON? JOHN McCAIN?

holy catfish, why must these VEEPSTAKES always verge on the frivolous? can't these news corps dream up some other way to make themselves relevant?