Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm an Obama supporter, but we shouldn't be talking about the Clintons' marital issues.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:30 PM
Original message
I'm an Obama supporter, but we shouldn't be talking about the Clintons' marital issues.
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 11:31 PM by Mooney
I may be a mean-spirited asshole, but I try to keep my comments limited to Hillary Clinton's behavior as a politician. Obviously, I can't dictate what people can or can't talk about, but her marriage and personal life aren't fair game.

Just in my humble opinion.

Carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. aww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary's "experience" is her marriage to Bill. SHE makes it an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. To be blunt, I'm talking about Monica-gate.
I've seen a lot of people talking about it lately and I don't think it's necessary. And when I saw that footage of Chelsea getting grilled about it, it was pretty jarring.

She's doing enough unacceptable shit as a politician that there should be plenty to talk about besides her marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No way should anyone be grilling
chelsea about that! The crystal ball remark, sure, but not that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. The crystal ball remark was in the context of a policy question.
I certainly think it's fine for Chelsea to have to field those kinds of questions if she's going to be a campaign surrogate. But she was personally affected by it (I'm assuming) during all the impeachment bullshit, at precisely an age where it could do maximum damage to her emotionally. There's just no reason for anyone to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. You don't think that the reason she tolerated his behavior was to get where
she is today? I think it was a valid question. What other means will she tolerate to get the end she desires?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That's her personal life, and I'm not voting for or against her personal life.
What she does as my senator and, hypothetically, as president, affects me. What she does in her marriage and the decisions that she makes in that context don't affect me and aren't my business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I think you're being a little disingenuous there, Mooney.
The decision-making process is the same. Why do you think scandals like Spitzer are so devastating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. That argument only works with Spitzer as the candidate.
If Eliot Spitzer were to run for office again, then you could make the argument that his prostitution scandal was a relevant subject. But if his wife were running for public office, you can't use the scandal as an issue against her.

By the same token, I don't think you can use Bill's infidelities as a campaign issue against Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Now you're just being silly.
Scandal counts differently for a candidate running for office than it does for one already in office? C'Mon!

And it's not Bill's infidelities. It's her decision to tolerate them for political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. It's not the same candidate.
Bill is a different candidate than Hillary. You can't use Bill's infidelity as a campaign issue against Hillary. If Bill were running for office again, you could use it against him. But he isn't, so you can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. Larry Sinclair says *HE* had an "experience" with your boy, Barry.
He says he sucked Barry's dick while Barry hit a crack pipe. Barry was married to Michelle when this was supposed to have happened.

Act like a freeper, and you'll be treated like one.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. Larry? Is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
55. Larry Sinclair failed two polygraph tests. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
42. she said it yesterday
'i was usually the first person bill spoke to', she is making her marriage the issue if she is going to use it as the linchpin for her experience. thus all the baggage associated with that relationship and the dynamic of which begs to be dissected in order to ascertain the acquisition of that experience and what influence and accomplishment it resulted in. it's her fault for putting it on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. in your opinion, is someone's spirituality/religion personal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes.
And I don't like people talking about that either, in the context of a political race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, I couldn't care less about that tawdry mess...
it's just that it seems to spill over into our world. And her campaign is but a preview of what her Fire by SniperLiar presidency would reflect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigleaf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, it now appears everything is fair game to Clinton. Okay by me. Let's get dirty everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. lets remember our candidate and lets not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm with ya on that one. I couldn't care less about it.
Hell, I didn't care when it was happening. No need to start now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. said sh'e left that church..Why stay with Bill then isn't that fair
I agree both shouldn't be an issue, but he didn't make any personal statements to that, while toady she opened herself up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. My lips are sealed and have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's not something I'd bring up, but
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 11:43 PM by donheld
you know as well as I do that if Obama was the one with that in his past Hillary would be all over it.

Edit to add: I'm an Obama boy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I know. And I agree with you. I have no doubt she would be all over it.
But I just can't get on board with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. You mean the fact that Rev. Wright was one of their spiritual guides...
...during their marital troubles?



NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Couldn't agree more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. I agree. There are much more serious problems with Hillary as a candidate
than this! I don't give a flying you-know-what about Bill and his issues, besides the fact that he lied about it. I'm more concerned with Hillary's lies NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Right.
I have plenty to object to about her as a political candidate. As far as her marriage, it's not my business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. That's more than enough to talk about
If people want to talk about Bill, let's talk about his library fundraising - we still haven't seen the donor list - and his sweet business deals where he nets, for example, $20M for lending his influence to Ron Burkle. That compromises HRC more than his affairs ever did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Here's the problem
I thought it was none of my business at the time, BUT

1.He did it in the oval office with a cigar while Hillary and Chelsea were in the house.
I know my own daughter's feelings on this and it is not in favor of Bill or Hillary.

2. Bill Clinton lied and then pointed his finger at the TV camera and the nation in accusation
of betrayal.

3. The 2000 election was coming up and that tainted Gore's chances


4. Now, the question is on character of the Clintons and lying.


5. Hillary said " the public is getting lied to" in a 60m interview.


6. WORDS MATTER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. I agree
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 11:51 PM by tammywammy
Asking Chelsea about Monica was uncalled for.


There are more pressing issues at hand, like Iraq, energy policies and the economy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Indeed
My blood still boils when I think about that whole bullshit ordeal and the entire year of 1998 wasted on that shit.

Did it ever occur to anyone that all the time the Clinton white House had to spend responding to demands from Ken Starr and his bullshit investigation? The depositions, the subpoenas, the lawyers, the documents they had to prepare for that little shit. All the white House Aides who were dragged into this and ran up six figure legal bills.

The only thing I do blame Clinton for was not firing Ken Starr and abolishing his office of "independent counsel".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. Those types of threads would also be good candidates for 'let it sink'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
better tomorrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. well then, no one should be talking about Jeremish Wright if
it only pertains to the actual politician. Hillary chose to stay with Bill. Obama chose to stay with Wright. Same differnce, but one is ok to talk about, one isn't? Both should be off limits then. What if Obama's daughter said regarding Church..."it's none of your business!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I don't think Wright is relevant either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
better tomorrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. that was my point....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. I agree with you.
It's unnecessary. She's done enough damage on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
36. I agree, it has no relevance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. Let the Clenis sink.
:thumbsup:

Their marriage is none of our business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
39. Problem is , when she starts ripping into her opponent for his "failing" to leave wright...
it questions his morals. Which threatens to open up the floodgates. Ideally obama responds to all of hillarys BS by not stooping to her level. But sometimes, you cant help punching back in kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
40. I agree
It's tasteless and irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
41. I agree, BUT those who think this issue would be ignored
in the general election are living in lala land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
43. thank you
I thought it was cock-sniffing bullshit when Republicans did it, and my view on it doesn't change when Democrats do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
44. I'm glad to see at least SOME Obama supporters are sane and hate-free
Others, including the ones so desperate to hate ANYTHING about Hillary, including her choice of clothing, are the loudest and most prolific.

Thanks for posting, Mooney (and others who supported the OP). We may disagree on a lot of things, but trashing a DEMOCRATIC candidate's personal life isn't cool. A marriage is a multi-faceted thing, and no one can judge one outside of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. No problem.
Like I said, I think anything that Hillary Clinton (or Obama or McCain) has done in her capacity as a politician is fair game and open to criticism. But she's not running for Wife, and I've just always been really fucking uncomfortable when political campaigns start using people's personal lives as fodder. Her religion, her marriage, all that stuff, is not relevant and is none of my business. God knows I've done my share of creepy shit that I'm not proud of in my own personal life, and it's not my place to judge.

I know that the GOP will try to use this stuff against her if she's the nominee, but I think that's beside the point. We're supposed to be better than those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. Let me answer you like one of Hillary's surrogates would on a MSM show....
...in reverse.

I don't think we should make an issue of how Bill Clinton has repeatedly cheated on Hillary Clinton from the time he was governor in Arkansas to his time when he was President and was exposed for being a liar in his affair with a young intern, Monica Lewinsky and possible new stories of more affairs on the side while Hillary Clinton either knew or was too diffused in their relationship to care.

It really shouldn't be discussed, even though many are curious of Bill being so unfaithful to his wife. It should be off record, even though many find that such behavior would return if they were in the White House again.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. I'll be damned if I pick up the Lewinsky-gate RW talking point
I won't touch the most destructive partisan attack with a 10 foot pole. Gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. I choose not to discuss such unimportant issues, but Hillary drug this primary into the gutter
so she'll get no sympathy from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
51. Yes, I am all for it being about politics only. I like the high ground feet don't get wt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
52. Agreed
Lets talk about political nepotism.
Maybe start with an historical overview of
inbred "royal" families of Europe who arranged
endless political marriages to place family members
in positions of power and it's effect on good governance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
53. I completely agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. An impreached President is angling to get back in the WH, that's an issue. Monica is an issue
for Bill if he wants to get into the fray.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC