Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For anyone who doesn't remember when Olbermann LOVED the Clintons, here's a reminder:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:56 PM
Original message
For anyone who doesn't remember when Olbermann LOVED the Clintons, here's a reminder:
9/27/07-Bill Clinton interview: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21020060/

10/11/07-Hillary Clinton interview: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21255520/

Olbermann only turned on Hillary when she started playing the RW "fear card." It had nothing to do with being a "shill" for anyone. He's just being consistent with his beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. not to mention the fact that, during the impeachment...
...he was beside himself with anger and every single night DEFENDED Bill Clinton. He was so pissed off his voice would shake.

Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There was no bigger defender of both Clintons... (K&R)
...than Keith Olbermann, back in the day when what they were doing was actually defensible.

Now, it isn't.

And, now, he's not.

it's just that simple, and the howls of protestation we hear from Hillary's unrepentant defenders is the projected manifestation of a lot of cognitive dissonance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thank you. That's right...
how people forget (or misremember?). :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. One should always misremember...
before one misspeaks. Excellent post, you are doing good work here. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
59. Of course!
And thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. very well said.
It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I remember him talking about how he HATED having to cover that!
But the Hillary supporters won't buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. on what show?
i never saw him before countdown, which is celebrating their 5th anniversary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. he had a show called... heck, I can't remember now...
...I had to look it up on Wiki, I couldn't remember the name of the show:

First NBC stint
In 1997, Olbermann left ESPN to host his own primetime show on MSNBC, The Big Show with Keith Olbermann. The news-variety program covered three or four topics in a one-hour broadcast. Olbermann also occasionally hosted the weekend edition of NBC Nightly News, and, along with Hannah Storm, co-hosted NBC Sports’ pre-game coverage of the 1997 World Series.

See also: Major League Baseball on NBC
When the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke in 1998, the show morphed into White House in Crisis. Olbermann became frustrated as his show was consumed by the Lewinsky story. In 1998, he stated that his work at MSNBC would "make me ashamed, make me depressed, make me cry."<5>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
54. The Big Show...
which he eventually walked away from because of the constant Lewinsky coverage that he was forced to do. Hillary's dittoes can't - or won't - see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is correct... he was slanted for Clinton until sometime in January
This is a matter of public record luckily... easily researched on tape
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksoze Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. payback for Shuster stuff
he was pissed about the Chelsea flap and Davids' suspension. Sure seemed about that time when he went off the graph oh Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Wrong. It was when Hillary played the FEAR CARD.
He hates that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. It wasn't that, and frankly I don't think he was slanted in favor of Clinton.
Remember, he was the one who apologized on-air for the phrase Schuster used. He made every effort to be fair and impartial in his coverage up to a point.

I think it started with some of the smearing before SC, but it was definitely the playing of the fear card that opened up the floodgates for him, and made him realize if he wasn't calling bullshit, than he was basically being like the right-wing newscasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. He was the first one to publicly apologize and to call Schuster onto the carpet...
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 09:45 PM by Barrymores Ghost
...nonetheless, Schuster's words were conveniently twisted in order to score cheap political points for Hillary, when the fact remains that Chelsea was out there stumping like a big adult, except that she would not allow the media to ask her anything.

This ties in with the Clintons' long-standing tendency to alienate members of the press, and their inability to play media-savvy...not a skill set that a serious presidential candidate should be missing from the old tool chest.

Guess she wanted to have the protective buffer afforded a child and a still be a shill for Mommy at the same time. Schuster saw through it and called them on it (albeit with a less-than-savvy choice of words), and that pissed off the Clinton Machine to a fair-thee-well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Exactly.
I'm glad SOMEONE remembers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. He sure was. But I still respected him and loved his Special Comments.
I didn't start accusing him of all sorts of bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. Yes, actually
I remember thinking "oh, I see Keith's supporting Clinton" back then. I hadn't made a choice yet myself at that point - so I thought that interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. As concise and to-the-point a top-post as I've seen.
Kudos, jenmito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks!
Again! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. There you go again providing links and facts to back up your points
instead of just talking out your arse.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Sorry. I can't help it!
That's what I do! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks, Jen....good info and a K&R for your thread!
BTW: The dog ate all the roasted chicken and tomato pizza! Well, I did have a slice or two...but she ate most of it. Well, actually, she only had one piece and I ate the rest. But is seemed like she ate all of it and I really, really did not blow my diet....I just misremembered....

You like my imitation of Hillary backing off a phony story? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Thanks, Hepburn!
:hi: Thanks for the update! :D Yes, nice use of the word. I just used a similar word in a post here! GMTA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nonsense - KO bought and resold Bill the racist card player/Hillary not controlling her racist
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 09:10 PM by papau
friends on purpose -

and ignored the fact that it was just Obama changing the subject from Hillary's win in NH so that she would get no momentum from that win.

David did a good smear job for Obama - just as Obama had requested.

And KO sold it as racist/insensistive Clinton's trying to screw with the minds of the 57% of the SC vote that was black - as if that was even logical.

KO is a GE shill - nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. You're full of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. I stopped watching him for awhile because his Hillary love-ins with Craig Crawford were unbearable
Crawford's still in the bag for the Clintons so you don't see him on KO anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Crawford is one million percent in the bag for Hillary, but I still watched the show.
I'm not going to call Keith anything but extremely fair and brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks! I remember he didnt METION OBAMA for almost all 2007
It was so aggrivating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. No problem! I remember that, too. But I didn't turn on Keith and start calling him
all sorts of ridiculous names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. During Iowa he constantly would bring up the fact that Obama barely won the vote among Dems
It felt like he was cheapening Obama's win to make it seem like he didnt beat Hillary by that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I remember those days when he really favored Hillary.
I didn't turn on him, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R. Keith drew the line at fearmongering.
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 10:02 PM by Tatiana
If anyone has been listening to his reporting or his special comments or his Bushed! segments, you will know that one thing he absolutely detests about the current administration is the fearmongering. From Bush to Cheney to Rumsfeld he has slammed them all, including Ari "watch what you say" Fleischer. So to see a person that he clearly supported late last year, cut the 3 A.M. ad and use the same tactic in her own campaign... I think Olbermann found this despicable and that explains the disdain that is apparent in his coverage of Team Clinton.

I don't have a problem with it because there are facts to support his rationale. So often the conservative media feels as if fairness is presenting two opposing viewpoints and giving them equal weight. But there's a problem with that. It's like the climate issue. Climate change is a FACT that is easily proven. But you have these loony right-wingers who believe it's fiction.

"Some scientists across the world believe Congress must act to protect the environment from looming disaster due to climate change."

"Citing new studies, that viewpoint is challenged by other scientists at the Heritage Foundation who contend there is no evidence of climate change at all."


That's often where the media leaves it, not providing the context of why it is more logical to believe climate change exists. I think there is a place for journalists to fill in that context and they should. Keith is, in his opinion, providing the context for the stories he covers. Maybe it's too much context. However, to say that he's out to get Clinton when he has favored and been very gracious to both Bill and Hillary in the past isn't fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Exactly.Good post!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. Thanks, jenmito, for this..put that baby to rest.
I remember in the beginning of the campaign there were posts on here that thought KO was actually pro hilary and I couldn't wrap my head around that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. No problem!
I think he WAS pro-Hillary in the beginning 'til the fear-mongering stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. She even had KO
fooled..my how they lost it when they went the rove playbook way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Exactly. I'm glad he finally saw the truth and wasn't afraid to call her on it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
34. Thank you, jenmito.
People have short memories. But it seems like only yesterday that I was reading posts about Keith being a hopeless "Hill shill." Now all I see is people calling him "Obamann."

It's as if they can't conceive of someone actually trying to just report what he sees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yup. I remember those days, too...
and I didn't turn on him like the Hillary supporters are now doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. Olbermann is saying what be thinks. I don't ever want him to stop doing that.
Even if I disagree with him.

Thanks for the reminder Jenmito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I agree. And I didn't hold it against him back then.
You're welcome! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. kick since the Olbermann haters are at it again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. KO was a big pro-Clinton-anti-Puke guy, up until the Clintons made it hard to tell the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. CORRECT!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yes. I don't understand this deeply entrenched need to ignore
reality. He's not keen on them because their behavior has been nothing to feel good about. He's the same person he's been. The same one people raved about and lauded to the skies. Suddenly he doesn't much like the way the Clintons are acting and it can't be because they're acting very badly indeed -- it MUST be because he's changed radically and become a shill.

It's just not logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Exactly.
I'm glad you noticed it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wowimthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
44. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. Thanks, wowimthere!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
45. Thank you!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. You're welcome!
And thank YOU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Pleasure's all mine!
:hi:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. I disagree.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 03:30 PM by jenmito
It's mine, too. :D :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
46. Keith O
actually was supporting Senator Clinton until mid-January '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Yup. He stopped only when she started with the RW tactics...
You KNOW he hates when people play the fear card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. I am Keith
and so were many of my acquaintances up until late '07. I wasn't thrilled with her candidancy, but Hillary was the presumed nominee and I supported her because I loved the Clintons. I spent most of the 90s defending them. But once I was able to really hear Obama's message and got to know him, I became really enthusiastic and hopeful that we had a nominee I could really get behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. I know people who say the exact same thing.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. He's in many HRC supporters' rear view mirror with tire tracks over his back already. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
58. No, he turned on Hillary
when the rest of the whores over there on MSGOP accepted their marching orders from GE(NBC). He didn't have the backbone to stand up to his superiors and the likes of Tweety and Russert. I faithfully watched him every fucking night until he turned like a slimy snake on the Clintons. He could have been a real man and a TV journalist by remaining neutral on the air. But, oh no...Keith joined in on the bashing of the Clintons and the protecting of his Majesty,BO. Fuck him......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. That's bull.
I watched him every night when he was supporting Hillary and still do. He turned on her because SHE turned into a RWer-type campaigner. He was not neutral. He had both Clintons on his show with friendly interviews and did NOT have Obama on. Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Could you list those "RWer-type campaign tactics"?
You mean like Obama's race baiting in South Carolina? Yes, the Clintons were looked upon as real racists before the Obama crew started their stirring of the pot.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Playing the fear card was the first one that got Keith calling her out.
Nobody called the Clintons "racists." But they DID race-BAIT. Two different things. Then the Muslim implication. I'm sure there are more things I'm leaving out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
61. kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
62. Could it be
The reporting of positive stories about the candidates actually involves candidates doing something positive?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Yes, it could be.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 08:09 PM by jenmito
(I love your sig line pic of that show-I forget the name-Science Fiction Theater 5000 or something?) :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Ah...
Mystery Science Theater 3000. Joy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Thank you!
I just couldn't think of the name! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. Those little robots were very snarky.
I don't think sarcasm has any place in true humor. I prefer a good "knock-knock" joke, and I know you do as well.

Patsy, I'm surprised you would carry around an image of those nasty, smart-mouthed, bickering little puppets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Please...
Fart jokes, not Knock Knock jokes. I have my principles.

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. And now that I think of it, those little robots
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 09:58 PM by Kurovski
...were also kind of sexy. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
64. Many of us "used" to love the clintons,......
but we're mostly alot of political junkies here that pursue the truth in our spare time, and have come to the conclusion, that hil and bil didn't pan out to be what they were supposed to be in the early 80's.

It just took some of us longer than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Yup, as did I...
I loved Bill Clinton and Hillary's my Senator. Now I can't stand either of 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. Are you a fickle person by nature?
Or, are you easily taken in by lofty oratory? Could you list some of BO's accomplishments since he decided to become a politician?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #64
74. Yes, you and the Rethugs are the "pursuers of truth"!
You and Rush, Hannity, and all the other Repukes have now determined that the Clinton years were just terrible because they just didn't "pan out".......WTF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
69. He was also called a "Hillary shill" right here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Ahhh. Thanks for the flashback! I made a comment on that thread to a Hillary fan who never replied
Thanks for the proof! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
77. Maybe Olbermann is just a front runner
He supports who ever is in the lead.

He's in the media which means that he is bought and paid for. Screw him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC