Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Technically, doesn't an extended Democratic Primary actually help the Democratic Party....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:22 PM
Original message
Technically, doesn't an extended Democratic Primary actually help the Democratic Party....
Ok, Howard Dean preached about this. He wanted Democratic money to go into all 50 states. He wanted the party built from the ground up. So lets say this does go to the convention and all 50 states plus US territories get to vote and it actually means something. Thats a hell of a party building exercise, and isn't that EXACTLY what Howard Dean wanted to happen from day one. 50 state strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think so.
We are in the minority on this board though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Theoretically, you are right. Unfortunately there is another factor at play....
Hillary's campaign tactics are to try to trash Obama. Not build up hillary. Not even say Obama is not as good. But to trash Obama as not fit to be president period, not even better than McCain. Since she is doing this, any benefit from the primaries is negated and more so by her kitchen sink.

How about a deal....no complaints about the rest of the primaries, no urging Hillary to quit....in return Hillary acts like a true Democrat for once and agrees to scrap her kitchen sink trash talk....

If she were running a positive campaign, or even a campaign within the normal limits of negativity, she would not be getting so many calls for her to hang it up.

However, she has not done so. So this talk about all 50 states counting sounds like desperation and whining....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Honestly, if my state hadnt already voted, I would currently vote for Obama, BUT
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 06:37 PM by ShaneGR
This business with Obama supporters jumping all over Hillary, Bill, Chelsea, and anyone associated with her campaign has also crossed the line. Enough already out of both of you, do you really think Obama is going to have it all "taken away" by the Clintons? Not gonna happen. It's funny, 99% of the hatred is based on what their supporters are saying, not what the candidates themselves are saying.

EDIT: I voted in Florida for Edwards, and if there was a revote tomorrow I'd vote Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. goes both ways
As a neutral observer, I can't see that.

Attacking the opposition for allegedly attacking - well that is an attack right there, and around and around we go in the same circles with charge being met by counter charge.

Much of the attacking of Clinton and her supporters relies upon - by overt admission of many Obama supporters - a view that she and they are evil incarnate and represent everything that is wrong with the party. Who wouldn't fight back against that? To say - as many do - that if Clinton supporters would just accept that she is evil incarnate and accept and support the nomination of her opponent, all would be well. Any objections to that are then characterized as "attacks" and as "dirty tricks" and God knows what.

It is easy to say that if the Clinton supporters would just go away there would be no fighting. But they could say that about the Obama supporters, as well.

Of course if we all agreed there would be no arguing. That goes without saying. "Give in, and admit you are wrong and evil, and we will stop fighting with you" is no olive branch. Blaming one side for all of the mess is just a clever and somewhat disingenuous way to contribute to exactly what you are supposedly complaining about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. The problem isn't that 50 states are voting, the problem is Hillary is a loose cannon.
If Hillary dropped out of the race taday, all the states would still vote.

Hillary and Bill kissing John McCain's ass wasn't good for the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. No. An extended and contentious primary season ending in a brokered
convention damages the eventual nominee. Why do you think all the dem leaders- and I mean all- don't want a brokered convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It won't be brokered unless an amazing turn of events happens with SDs.
SDs who, at the brokered convention, would still be making the same decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. No. An extended and contentious primary season ending in a brokered
convention damages the eventual nominee. Why do you think all the dem leaders- and I mean all- don't want a brokered convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why do you think Dean isn't letting the SDs decide it already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. It would seem so to me.
The field director of our office here in NC seems to think so. The only people I know who
don't think so are the people here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Couple problems, the vast amounts of money that is being spent will not be
available for the GE. McCain got to quit spending for primaries and has started advertising.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Not true.... that assumes that the well is dry for GE money
Obama is raising more than a million dollars a day on the internet, each month is a wave of new money, a lot of it coming from the state he's about to campaign in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. It is still money i would prefer to see spent on the GE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's fine and has been a very good warmup for the GE
There can be no doubt that our eventual nominee, Barack Obama, has sharpened his skills and ability to deal with whatever comes up.
I say let 'em buck. The meme about this being a benefit to McCain is hogwash. A week or a month is a lifetime in politics. The benefit he may appear to achieve in head to head polls at this point vanishes once we have our nominee. Every indicator is still in the DEM's corner for this election. Let's not lose track of something so basic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I agree, I do not see a scenario where McCain can win....
With the continued economic downturn and the coming summer in Iraq, any candidate aligned with Bush on ANYTHING is going to get their asses handed to them in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes and No
Good to be vetting our own candidates where the debate is still being framed on Dem terms (and yes, I am being generous with Mrs. Clinton by saying that).

Bad in that McCain is getting a 6 or so month pass from negative press -- which can only help his positive ratings while we tear each other apart.

Good in that everything we are airing now will be useless and 'yesterdays news' in the general.

Bad in that donors are getting tapped out and we will need donations to both the candidate AND the DNC in the fall.

I am in PA and am ready for this to be over. If I wake up tomorrow and hear that she dropped out and my vote "doesn't count", I am all for it and ready to take on the republican machine ASAP rather than have to defend Senator Obama against all comers against HRC and her smear campaign.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Counter-point
Why is it assumed that its bad for Obama and Clinton to say "bad things" about each other. All of that will come out in the GE anyways, so why not get all the dirt out in the open early while theres still 150% coverage of each response. Kerry got swiftboated because he took like a week to say anything. These campaigns are firing back and forth everyday. They get their point across quickly, and its framed as democrats even if it seems ugly just because they're "fighting."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16.  I thought I just listed those points as positives?
Sorry if I mislead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC