|
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 04:41 AM by Political Heretic
Racism, has become institutionalized and covert. There's still plenty of it, but our society and the media don't overtly ignore it or embrace it.
Sexism on the other hand in its overt forms is still more socially acceptable. People don't yet have the same kind of universal social agreement that calling women bitches, whores, c***s, or saying that they just "get like that" or how we wouldn't want a "moody, irrational woman" in positions of power, or saying that a woman's place is in the home raising kids, or that a woman should be confined to certain roles or certain places - is unacceptable.
These things are still much, much more acceptable in society and in the media. Sexism hasn't evolved as far as racism has, where it makes the transition "underground" into the subtext of our society while we pat ourselves on the back for "overcoming racism" because its not ok to be overtly racists on television anymore, even while institutionally, racism continues to be a dire problem.
But here's a really important thing to remember:
Just because the fight against sexism is still in its overt stage while racism has moved into the covert and institutionalized stage doesn't mean one is more important than the other, or that one is more significant than the other.
It's true, America has made progress in both the areas of dismantling racism and sexism. But in both cases, both are still very real and present problems and challenges in american society. Just because they rear their ugly heads in slightly different ways doesn't mean we should diminish one to stand against the other.
In recent days, some folks on DU have come awfully, awfully close to almost pitting rejecting sexism against rejecting racism, and have come dangerously closer to trying to diminish their pervasiveness and seriousness of the continuing problem of racism in America and our American institutions in order to talk about the seriousness of sexism. We must not do this. We can not start pitting disadvantaged groups against each other as though they all must fight each other for access to their rights.
Instead, we have to unite together in the battle against prejudice and discrimination in all forms. That's why though I am a man and thus enjoy privilege in this society that I did nothing to deserve other than "be born," the struggles of woman against insult, denigration and deprivation are my struggle - and no support of any presidential candidate is ever going to make me forget that. The struggle of women is not in conflict with the struggle against racism. Neither are in conflict with the struggle against hetero-centrism and homophobia. We are all in this together.
Here at DU, people who think that sexist language is acceptable need to be soundly criticized by black, white, male, female, obama-supporters and clinton supporters. Just like people who use race baiting and racist innuendo deserve such united criticism. And just like people who use homophobic rhetoric deserve united criticism.
One brand of discrimination is not worse than another. And in American Society, any attempt to pretend that racism is somehow not as much of a problem as sexism OR vice versa is tragically ignorant. Don't confuse the fact that sexism is more overt in the media while racism is more institutionally covert for a belief that one is no longer as significant as the other. Please avoid the irrational tendency to need YOUR cause to be "more important / most important" above everything else - please don't see issues of discrimination and prejudice as a competition to see which type is worst.
|