Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush changing his story on Prison abuse scandal"only set broad guidelines"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:17 PM
Original message
Bush changing his story on Prison abuse scandal"only set broad guidelines"
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39669 >

BUSH CHANGING HIS STORY ON PRISON ABUSE SCANDAL

President Bush has claimed that the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib was "disgraceful conduct by a few American troops,"<1> and had nothing to do with broader administration policy. But according to a March 2003 Pentagon memo, Bush administration lawyers issued legal justifications for torture, specifically claiming, "President Bush was not bound by either an international treaty prohibiting torture or by a federal anti-torture law."<2> The revelations have now forced the President to backtrack from his previous denials of culpability, with the White House yesterday admitting for the first time that Bush did, in fact, "set broad guidelines"<3> for interrogation in Iraq - a tacit admission that Bush himself "opened the door"<4> to the torture tactics in the first place.

Now, the U.S. Senate is demanding the full Pentagon memo from the Bush administration. But the President has refused, instead dispatching Attorney General John Ashcroft to tell "lawmakers he won't release or discuss"<5> the memo, even if he is cited for contempt of Congress. This is the same Ashcroft who "conveniently declassified"<6> internal Justice Department memos in an effort to slander 9/11 commissioner Jamie Gorelick. It is also the same Bush administration that leaked the classified name of a CIA officer<7> in an effort to intimidate a former ambassador who had debunked
their false WMD claims.<8>


Sources:

1. Presidential Speech, White House Website, 5/24/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39670.
2. "Lawyers Decided Bans on Torture Didn't Bind Bush", The New York Times, 6/08/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39671.
3. "Memo on Torture Draws Focus to Bush", The Washington Post, 6/09/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39672.
4. "The Roots of Torture", Newsweek, 5/24/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39673.
5. "U.S.'s Ashcroft Won't Release or Discuss Torture Memo (Update 2)", Bloomberg.com, 6/08/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39674.
6. "Mr. Ashcroft's Smear", The Washington Post, 4/20/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39675.
7. "Mission to Niger", townhall.com, 7/14/03, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39676.
8. "White House "warned over Iraq claim", BBC News, 7/09/03, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=39677.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will Bush testify this time with Adolf Ashcroft so they keep their
stories straight. Guilty guilty guilty! I want Bush in that hood standing on a box with wires on his nads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol
You made my day...what a great picture that would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You would probably have more luck attaching them to his socks...
they're probably easier to find!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. These people think they are above the law
It is also the same AG who re-classified the testimony of S. Edmond's.

Grassley brought that up yesterday when talking to ASScrack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. These jackasses won't make it to the convention, let alone November.
They're really messing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Maybe they are just trying to stay out of prison, at this point? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I can see a presidential election with no
candidates on the Republican side of the ballot. Dignity in the White House my ass. Only after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's stories like these that give me hope......
that there's still a little tiny bit of freedom left here in the US. There are enough people who care about what happens to those under our "care".

"Under every Bush there's dirt"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Broad guidlines
here is the broad

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC