Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean Cites Terror Alert As Vindication ....Guardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:01 PM
Original message
Dean Cites Terror Alert As Vindication ....Guardian
Edited on Fri Jan-02-04 08:21 PM by madfloridian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3579159,00.html

SNIP..."NASHUA, N.H. (AP) - Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean on Friday cited the higher terror alert and the number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq in arguing that he was right to say Saddam Hussein's capture didn't make America safer.

``They got all excited, but here we are,'' Dean told a town-hall meeting. ``We've lost 10 more troops and F-16s are escorting foreign passenger jets into our air space because we're now more worried than we were before.''

SNIP.."``I can assure you it's not Saddam who's threatening to bomb airplanes,'' Dean said. ``It's al-Qaida. We've not paid attention to al-Qaida. We've spent $160 billion, lost over 400 servicemen, and wounded and permanently maimed over 2,000 people because we picked the wrong target.''

Dean said even though he opposed the Iraq war, his greatest fear now is that ``this administration will pull out of Iraq too early for political reasons,'' Dean said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well said.
I'm glad someone's saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. This should be repeated as often as possible.
``We've spent $160 billion, lost over 400 servicemen, and wounded and permanently maimed over 2,000 people because we picked the wrong target.''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. dean basically is saying that the emperor has no clothes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you read...
...Mitchell Gore's bit too, eh? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. So I am repeating it.
``We've spent $160 billion, lost over 400 servicemen, and wounded and permanently maimed over 2,000 people because we picked the wrong target.''


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dean must get sick of being right.
But have no fear. The next new thread of outrage against him is surely in the making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another home run hit for Howard!
Personally, I think the terror threats are complete bullshit. But by insisting the danger is real, the Fraudministration (not to mention the DLC hit squad) has to admit that the Doc was right when he said we are no safer with Saddam in custody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course he was right.
Thank God somebody has the guts to at least broach the truth on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's absolutely right!
Stick THAT in your ear, Joe, et al! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, goody! he's hit the trifecta then?
Love I told you so when the country is terrorised by W. What's next? Hooray, the economy is in the tank?
He has a gift od saying things that are technically right in a way that is grating everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Left-handed compliment?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. If they were leading the pack, they'd be less irriatated.
Be honest, now; don't you agree that a lot of what they find 'grating' wouldn't be so grating if they were in the lead? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is front page on the Boston Globe site, too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. -LEADERSHIP-
The roll-over Dems could learn something from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lobo_13 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. See what happens . . .
when you tell the truth and stick to your guns?

There is a lesson here for all who are willing to find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. yep!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sorta sneaky little aside...
the Bush admin. might pull out of Iraq early for political reasons...of course they might, knowing Bushies, but maybe implies that others who want us to pull us out of Iraq have political reasons???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. This quote is interesting
Dean said even though he opposed the Iraq war, his greatest fear now is that ``this administration will pull out of Iraq too early for political reasons,'' Dean said.

Dean could use that to run to the right of * in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. We can't leave destroyed Iraq in power vacuum
Even Kucinich wouldn't leave Iraq without troops of some kind present in Iraq to make sure Iraq isn't the next Afghanistan.

Dumbya hasn't finished a damn thing in his life. He's quit and run away from everything that was a little tough he's touched.

We need to get UN troops into Iraq under a UN mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He means we broke it, we have to get others in to help fix it.....
before we just pull out. I think that is right.

That has been his stance in every debate, in every speech, it is no secret.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. So Dean is now "for the war"
Call it what you want, but Dean is saying he'd stay in Iraq, i.e. still continuing the war. How does that make all the people who think Dean is not for war feel?

Ah, never mind. You'll think it's great... except that his position on the war is identical to Kerry's and others that want the UN to come in and set up a multinational force, as Kerry originally intended IF we were to even go to war, which would have been as a last resort and AFTER the UN had gone in and found the WMDs that Bush was drumming up in lies in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dd123 Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Dean greatly dislikes irresponsibility.
Seems to me that is his biggest gripe w/Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. The difference between Kerry and Dean is SHOCK AND AWE
Edited on Sat Jan-03-04 05:43 AM by mouse7
Dean said don't invade Iraq, focus on Afghanistan and finding a solution to the North Korean mess.

Kerry allowed Dumbya to Shock and Awe Iraq, leaving Iraq with no working infrastructure.

If Dean's ideas had been done, we'd be slowly working on eventually getting rid of Saddam, negotiating the elimination of North Korea's nukes, and the military would be finishing the job of hunting down Al Queda in Afghanistan.

Thanks to Dumbya and Kerry, the Taliban is regrouping in Afghanistan, and Al-Queda is growing in Afghanistan and Iraq. Oh, yeah, North Korea also has working nukes and lots of new processed nuclear materials, too. Iraq's infrustructure is a bombed out disaster. If Dumbya has his way, a oil empire-friendly puppet will be left in charge in Iraq with a skeleton force that will get ooverthrown by Islamic extremists within months instead of allowing an International force of sufficient size to keep Iraq from decending into chaos.

This is what all that "foreign policy experience" of Kerry's has gotten for us. Al Queda strong in two countries, N. Korea with a model nuclear weapons production program, and an Iraq that will devolve into chaos with months, even weeks after the US runs away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Here we go again
Dean was for the first Gulf War (Kerry wasn't), for the Afghanistan War and originally for the present Gulf War and even supported a unilateral strike at the time that the vote was cast, thus pretty much putting him in the same crowd as Lieberman, Gephardt and Bush. Not Kerry.

Blaming Kerry for Bush's failures in Afghanistan when Kerry is on record demanding that working on the al-Qeada problem instead of attacking Iraq unilaterally is pure misinformation.

Much like what your candidate is good at...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Why do you have trouble with not "anti-war" but "anti-Iraq war"?
Every speech, every time he talks out he makes clear he is not anti-war if it is needed.

He is opposed to this war on moral grounds. It was an invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Spin, spin, and spin again... KERRY VOTED FOR WAR IN IRAQ
Kerry voted to invade Iraq.

Kerry voted to invade Iraq.

Kerry voted to invade Iraq.

Kerry voted to invade Iraq.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. I know, it kills me when the media portrays Dean as anti-war
While he was against Iraq, he knows we have to finish what we started. Often the media gets him confused with Kucinich, I think.
Dean and CMB are the only anti-war (Iraq) candidates who realize now that we are there we have to stay.

Hmm, maybe a Dean/Braun ticket would work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. You forgot that Clark knows we have to stay to finish up...and has
presented a detailed plan..

Dean and CMB are not he ONLY ones.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. But does that plan include cleaning up our war mess?
To me that's a huge prerequisite for approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. Is Dean going to predict that snow will be coming this winter?
Wow! What a guy...

:puffpiece:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yes, he is quite a guy.
Thanks for noticing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
29. HOWEVER, the GOP have a couple of things in their arsenal including
Edited on Sat Jan-03-04 11:34 AM by Gloria
Libya--Now, real reports (like I've heard on the BBC) will say that Libya is not exactly within the same sphere as the rest of the Arab Nations and that this rapprochment has been going on for 10 years (Clark has said that, too)...but the Bush machine is pointing to this as a direct result of Iraq...

Iran--agreeing to let inspectors in from the International Atomic Energy group...negotiating also for quite awhile...but another thing that will be used evidence that Iraq has shaken up the Arabic Nations and the region.

As I heard a Canadian diplomat discuss today--perception often wins out over what is really going at the (geo)political level....

So, you can bet, this broad statement by Dean will be picked apart, no problem. Esp. with a shocking % of Americans believing that Saddam and Al-Qaeda are related.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. You don't think Dean should try to get the truth out the connection?
I do.
There were some articles someone posted there that Libya had been trying to cooperate for a couple of years.. Will have to find them.

Yes I think it is time to try to get the truth out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. According to Hackworth that casualty number is over 20,000.
Makes an even stronger point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. I noticed that, does make a stronger point.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. If the press would just do their damn job....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'll be candid - I love the way the good doctor triumphed on this issue
and the way the other cringing Dems betrayed their true colors on the war - but it's a pity that the innocent and the young, American and Iraqi, continue to pay a terrible price for the duplicity of the Bush administration and the self-serving calculations of our Democratic leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC