Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Not WHO McCain And The Rethugs Will Throw The Most Shit At

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:03 AM
Original message
It's Not WHO McCain And The Rethugs Will Throw The Most Shit At
it's who is best equipped to handle the shit that they throw. Hillary attacks and it comes right back at her. Every time she's gone after Obama, she sinks her ratings more than his. Why the hell do you think that would play out differently in the general if she's the nominee? And Obama hasn't even really attacked her. McCain and the repukes won't be nearly as kind to her as Obama's been. When she attacks she comes off as desperate and nasty. She sucks at it. Obama comes off as relaxed, humorous and smooth. Call him a con man or whatever, but he's so much better at campaigning than she is.

Hillfans say that there's sooo much more to throw at Obama. Are you freakin' kidding? First of all, the repukes have been doing opposition research on Hill and Bill for 7 years, putting together a portfolio of new Clinton crap. Secondly, they don't need or care whether information is factual. They'll gladly throw out lies and innuendo about whoever the nominee is. The line that Americans aren't interested in Clinton dirt is hill-arious. They always have been, and they always will be. And the majority of Americans are ready to believe, the most outrageous, the worst crap about either Bill or Hill. Impervious to right wing attacks? Not even close. Hillary's favorability is in the toilet, and even Bill has suffered from his shenanigans over the last few months, with his favorability falling sharply.

So the point remains, who is best able to handle attacks in the general? I don't think that could be clearer. Barack Obama has survived Rezco and Wright. He'll survive bitter-gate. He has game. She doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're right and the Repubs are paying attention to her lack of ability
to fling crap at Obama and having it stick. They're watching for vulnerability and she's a loose cannon. Good post Cali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. thanks. Hill has demonstrated that she has negative charisma
and she's got far more velcro than teflon. She makes it easy for shit to stick to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, and let's not forget all the loot the Clintons raked in. Does
anyone think Bill's ties to Colubia, UAE, China, etc., won't be investigated and made a big deal of? Yes, he's not running, but it won't matter. That's what she'll get for making him such a big part of her resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. yep, and it's not just the financial stuff
anyone who thinks that old scandals won't pop up and resonate, is living in a fantasy world, and yes, Bill's personal life over the past 7 years would be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Look at this graph of Clinton's speechifying...
:wow: I imagine someone will be picking this apart.


Clinton's Golden Voice

Bill Clinton earned $31 million in speaking fees between 2001 and 2005, as disclosed in his wife's Senate ethics reports. This page lists information about each speech and the amount the former president earned.

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2007/clinton-speeches/list/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. That loot is over a seven year period.....Why has nothing been said about
McCain's wealth...Its seems Democrats always pick up on a Republican tactic like making an issue out of the Clinton income when in reality its a non-issue.Democrats can sometimes be a Republican's best friend when it comes to repeating Repuke propaganda or an issue that is kept in the headlines because Democrats keep it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Ummm, because they just released their income tax returns and
McCain hasn't yet AFAIK? And because there are some 'irregularities' in who big dawg was keeping company with? Google Bill Clinton + Columbia, + China, + UAE, and tell me what you think of his involvement. I guarantee the rethugs will be researching this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well said. Hillary ran as the competence-candidate and only showcased her lack of ability
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. The lack of ability applies only to her campaign
I think she could be a very competent administrator. Of course we will need much more than that in the next few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. She has undertaken 2 MAJOR political battles till now - Health care & Presidency. Result -Failure
And her record speaks for itself. We need a leader not a policy wonk out there in the WH. Why do you assume she will be a good administrator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. She knows how the system works. Re health care--
--we did not have an effective grassroots ground organization pushing her and Congress on the issue. Both Obama and Clinton have admitted publicly that single payer is the best option. That means that both are very pushable on the issue. It's up to us to do the organizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Seriously. The GOP has a shit factory in their basement
and a shit-throwing machine on their roof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Y'all are WAY too afraid of Republicans. They have obviously lost their will to win.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 06:17 AM by Perry Logan
Poor bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm not afraid of repukes. I'm realistic about the fact that
historically the repukes favor throwing the proverbial kitchen sink and have no hesitation about doing it. Why do you think this election would be an exception?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Realism is a good thing....
we need a little more of it especially when dealing with a party that has taken dirty politics to a whole new level. Rule #1... Never, never underestimate these assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. The Republican mojo is as limp as a winger's dick.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 06:32 AM by Perry Logan
There's a groundswell of public opinion against them. They've lost money. Their power at the state level has been decimated. Voting groups have greatly reduced their ability to flip elections. And even they don't like their candidate.

You can also tell their whipped just by looking at them. There's none of the creepy self-confidence they displayed in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. K/R. Well said Cali.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Agreed....
He is rubber......She is glue.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Obama hasn't even BEGUN...
...to survive Rezko and Wright. They haven't gone away...Obama isn't done with them yet. Just wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Please try and address the point I'm making
He's far better than Hillary at dealing with negative crap. She really is the velcro candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. And Obama is the the new teflon candidate.
Just like G.W.B. was until America scratched the teflon off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. don't do serious injury to yourself with your desperate
contortions trying to link bush with Obama. It's ridiculous to pretend that he's anything remotely like bush. They couldn't possibly have less in common- and bush never had teflon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. If your contortions over how "horrible" Clinton is don't hurt you, then the truth about Obama
doesn't hurt me in the slightest. Bush and Obama have much in common. You just refuse to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. really? What do they have in common?
Aside from the fact that they're male American politicians who each have a degree from Harvard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Well.
Both President Bush and Senator Obama have campaigned as "Uniters.", but are really dividers. Haven't we learned that lesson? Their are many more but I doubt you would listen so I'll just leave it at that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm sorry, but there is no evidence that Obama is a divider
and that theme is an old chestnut, hardly new when bush used it. That really doesn't show that they're alike in any way. And if you have this great insight as to how deeply similar the two are, you should really share it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. There is plenty of evidence Obama is a divider, just look around this place,
and the rest of the internet. Obama and his supporters have run the most divisive campaign that the Democratic party has ever seen, all the while claiming to be the uniter's. Spare me your bullshit, or not I really don't care. I don't believe it from Obama and I certainly don't believe it from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks, cali...
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 07:35 AM by ms liberty
this is what I've been saying. It's not what poo or who they throw it at, it's how quickly and well the person it's been thrown at reacts to and handles the poo.


K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. K&R
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 05:29 PM by backscatter712
As the saying goes: "I'm rubber and you're glue. Your words bounce off of me and stick to you."

Obama has it mastered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC