Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton will lose for the same reason Kerry lost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:22 PM
Original message
Clinton will lose for the same reason Kerry lost
Kerry didn't lose because he is an elitist (right wing talking point) if anything he lost because people didn't find him authentic (duck hunting? pandering with "I voted for it before I voted against it). Hillary Clinton turning into a beer drinking Annie Oakley is far worse than Obama poorly crafting together some words that are essentially true. These people are all wealthy and well educated (right wing criteria for elitist), but it's the authenticity that wins. John McCain is appealing to people because they find him authentic (the stupid "straight talk express"), Obama may have made a few errors when speaking, but he never shape shifts into something else. Hillary has become the master panderer and it's not attractive.


P.S Hillary, Gore didn't lose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. He lost because Ohio elections were soooooooo dirty. Everything
was wrong with them from votes not counted to not enough voting machines to all the other regular dirty tricks. Florida, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. right, I know that there could be fraud, but he should have killed GWB
and I think his fatal flaw was his pandering an inauthenticity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. He could have crooned like Sinatra and won every old-timer's vote
and it still wouldn't have mattered. The FIX was in. It was already decided that he would not win. The dictatorship was not going to give up its power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. Agreed..The fix was in long before election day and I fear that
all the tools are in place to steal this one..Lets see how close the phony polls have Obama and McCain once this primary is over...
The corporations have gained so much power under the Bush/ Repuke administration they certainly aren't going to give that up easily...Democrats will uncover all the corruption that has taken place under Bush.With McCain it will be hands off and business as usual. Oil companies can expect to pay a windfall tax with Obama and with McCain they continue that free ride...So with all this and much more to lose they will not give up this election easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. BULLSHIT! Kerry hunted for 50 YEARS. He wasn't BACKED UP by the Dem pundit class
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 05:42 PM by blm
who let the RW rule the talk shows with their BULLSHIT that YOU decided to believe.

Try KNOWING your nominee julia - because YOU didn't do your job to know the truth, either.

There hasn't BEEN a nominee as skilled in so many sports as Kerry, and that includes the fact that he's an EXPERT MARKSMAN.

He was also an AUTHENTIC war hero - and an AUTHENTIC statesman who uncovered and exposed more government corruption than any lawmaker in modern history - and lazyminded dumbasses who don't know that would imply and say otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. It's not a matter of how fabulous he is at any sport
It was how forced it appeared when he tried to show it off in a way that is anything but natural.


I'm sure Clinton may enjoy a beer..... but the whole scene at the bar did not come off as her natural habitat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. BULLSHIT AGAIN - he hunted for FIFTY FUCKING YEARS and an expert marksman - if the talking heads
would have told the truth and repeated it the way they claimed Bush was a rancher cowboy the public would have seen him that way.

The Dem pundits and LAZY Dems who claim to be activists now are the ones who never bothered to get to know their nominee enough to defend him with the truth as effectively as Bush was defended with lies, fer chrissakes - and that's why Bill HAD his book tour in June and July - to make SURE the DEm voters DIDN'T get to know their nominee enough to defend him.

You showed YOUR colors - the truth was there and you chose to buy into the lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Listen, I really like Kerry and was thrilled to vote for him
But knowing the way the media works he wasn't very savvy at image control.

I think Kerry is one of Obama's greatest supporters and I can only dream of what it would have been like if he had won, but it's not wise for a party to ignore their mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Anything but natural?
For criminity sakes he wore a hunter's outfit, I thought that is what you are suppose to wear for when you HUNT, what is so god damned un-natural about that?

Just shows how people fall for crap and by the way that did not make him lose the election, republican dirty tricks in many states with Republican Secretary's of State just like Florida (Harris)for Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Now even Dems are easily told by the media that a lifelong hunter in a hunting jacket is 'phony' and
they suck the lies right up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I know
it simply amazes me how easily they are suckered into elitist pundits spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. You're missing the point. He might have been authentic, but he didn't come across as authentic.....
and Hillary is neither authentic or come across as authentic.

The OP is right, despite the Ohio fiasco, Kerry should have trounced shrub. The DLC and the 33% strategy payed off as well for Kerry as it did for Gore. The one time it did work it cost us both houses of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. BULLSHIT - if the media had accompanied those events with the TRUTH you wouldn't be repeating LIES
for them now, would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. What lies would those be? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. The ONLY reason he was cast as a phony was because corpmedia NEEDED him to be seen that way and
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 07:00 PM by blm
YOU repeat the lying image that they made sure to craft instead of STICKING with the TRUTH - they could have taken those pics and given an accurate narrative to go along with the photos - the press knew damn well there wasn't a more wellrounded and graceful athlete in DC than Kerry, but they needed to protect Bush.

Dan Rather has admitted they needed to protect Bush for the favorable rulings on media expansion they expected in a second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Let's be honest, Kerry looked like a dork when wind surfing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #43
54. He didn't on the cover of Windsurfer Magazine in 1997. But you see what corpmedia TELLS you to see
and you never knew enough about the Dem nominee so you were easily manipulated that way.

YOU failed YOUR duty as a citizen who imagines yourself as an activist for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. WTF are you talking about? What was I suppose to do about Kerry looking like a dork?..........
Should I have ran out to the beach and told said, "Hey Senator, don't do it - they'll make you look like a dork."?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. thank you... that was what I was trying to say
As sad as it is image control is important and while I'm sure Kerry is an authentic person, it was too damn easy for the right wing to paint him otherwise. I think Clinton will have a similar problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfiniteNether Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. I second that. Ohio was definitely stolen. The best way to override
the neoconservative voting machines is to overwhelm them in all counties. Obama can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
55. When machines are rigged by PERCENTAGES, then numbers don't matter. Kerry gained 10 million more
votes than Gore did. And that doesn't even include the 5 million 'lost' votes. In 2002 if anyone would have predicted the 2004 nominee would get 10 million more votes than Gore, it would have been deemed an overwhelming performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfiniteNether Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. So what can we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. This shows more about you than Senator Kerry
I think you should self delete this as it is in poor taste and possibly illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. BINGO. Hillary's weakness is trustworthiness and like-ability. I made a post earlier
about how Hillary's big mistake in this 'Bitter' bullshit was HER pushing the story herself. Not to mention going off on how she is more American and how she has secretly always loved guns and whatnot. Obama put the final nail in her coffin when he straight-out called her on it last night, calling her Annie Oakley. The polls show a distrust and dislike of Clinton, and Obama knows that.

THAT'S why people laughed when Obama said what he did last night. He was laughing himself and was totally at ease. I'm sorry, but Hillary doesn't come across that way, and that is why her pushing this bitter stuff will not help her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry lost because he didn't properly defend himself
He didn't fight against the swift boat attacks hard enough and allowed the right-wing to define him. That was the problem with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. there was that too I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Bullshit - he did - the corpmedia didn't show his speech attacking swifts. and He WON.
The RNC stole that election for Bush and Clinton loyalists at the DNC sat on their hands for four years and LET them have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Key word: AUTHENTICITY. Obama (rightfully or not) has it. Hillary doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. It is also referred to as charisma, Obama has it, Kerry, Hillary & Gore do not
neither does Dukakis or Mondale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. Gore didn't have it in 2000
He sure the hell has it NOW, though. The trick was permanently shaking off "handlers." I bet if Clinton did that, she'd look way more "charismatic" than she does now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pandering with "I voted for it before I voted against it? Do you even know what you're talking about
That was a spin by the Republicans and had nothing to do with pandering.

Duck hunting? I would say vote suppression and lies.

Oh, Kerry won the primary.

Hillary is no John Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes pandering
I voted for it before I voted against it was one of the stupidest lines I've ever heard and the Republicans wouldn't have had it to play with if he didn't say it.

The duck hunting was ridiculous and not being himself.

I do agree with you on voter suppression and lies, but the combination was fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. No,
the facts have nothing to do with pandering.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. rightfully or wrongly, kerry indeed had an image problem. Was it the main cause of his loss? No.
It didn't help, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. There is a difference between media supported distortion and Hillary's lies
This is an apples to oranges comparison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. Not in the effect they have on the public, unfortunately. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. I guess not
It gets me how so many on DU don't know a damn thing about votes in the Senate.

The only panderer I see in this race name starts with a H and ends with a Y.

Oh and to the OP, John Kerry is probably one of the best surrogates Obama has and did you notice how his campaign took off once Kerry endorsed Obama, I did and so did many others. So please don't compare Kerry to Clinton they are like night and day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I personally loved Kerry and was very proud to vote for him
but that doesn't mean I couldn't see his flaws and where things went a little wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Word !!!
"Hillary Clinton turning into a beer drinking Annie Oakley is far worse than Obama poorly crafting together some words that are essentially true."

EXACTLY !!!

K & R !!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Annie Oakley?
I doubt she was a beer drinking swizzler. But she certainly was a crack shot. A better comparison might be Katie Elder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Maybe Bonnie Parker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Heh, heh....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Also, why would Clinton bait Gore like that?
He didn't seem like he was itching to jump into this race and now his phone will be ringing for his feelings on her comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyHatedByBothSides Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. To poison the well before...
...he can play elder statesman within the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Yeah... I was wondering if they knew something was coming
because it's seems really stupid to bait him into that position any earlier then they can keep him out of that role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is it okay now to associate Obama with any character we want?
Annie Oakley and all . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyHatedByBothSides Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. But Hillary will get away with it...
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 06:04 PM by IndyHatedByBothSides
...since she now appears to be the neo-conservative candidate.

Seriously. Two years ago, how many of you would have believed that Hillary would be despised by so many Democrats, including the bulk of DU, while at the same time celebrated by the neo-con punditry?

She's emerged as Cheney 2.0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kerry lost because he has no charisma and a funny looking hound dog head
And some people want us to nominate an annoying woman who lectures people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Amen!
lectures, lies, triangulates, spins... whatever, she does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. What Hillary supporters fail to realize is that only they like her. Nobody else does. And a fawning
media would not make her any more likeable.

She is just plain annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. Not only that, but she inspires Republican turnout
People who might otherwise stay home will go vote against her. She is the villain of the right wing (unfairly so, but it's the truth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
58. What a lookist post. Cancel securing the election process, because 'looks' will get votes counted.
Kerry WON and he LOOKED presidential no matter how you wish to distract from the FACT that he'd be in office today if Terry McAuliffe had done HIS Job after 2000 and secured the election process in states where he KNEW for FOUR YEARS the race could be stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
45. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
47. Kerry was authentic - thge difference is the media
As to I voted for it - it was a sentence summing up an answer he had given in detail moments before - he voted for a version of the spending bill that rolled back tax cuts, then voted against the final version that didn't. This was not pandering and it was explained a million times - with a media acting as if they couldn't remember for 2 minutes. As to hunting - Kerry is a hunter - one thing I dislike about him.

The fact is Kerry was far more a maverick than McCain - protesting VN, Going after the Contras when Democrats like Clinton and Gore were tacitly for funding the Contras, then fighting BCCI when everybody in both parties was against it. He is also genuinely more honest and straight forward than McCain ever was. Not to mention he is clean - while McCain was one of Keating 5 and has been very involved with lobbyists.

Just consider that the media treated purple heart bandaids as if they were silly novelty hats worn to the convention. Think about that. The Navy gave Kerry those purple hearts because he was injured. Think about that - he was a healthy 25 year old athlete. He still has shrapnel in his leg. Any of those wounds had the angle or his position been different could have left him dead or severely injured. he was lucky, if you think being hit three times is lucky! Of all the things in Kerry's life they could have used, this was the most pathetic. Kerry himself did nothing to deserve this - unless challenging Bush was a sufficient cause to use something like this to attack a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
51. Perception is reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
52. Hillary didn't "turn" into anything.
Hillary can drink and holds her liquor quite well (ask McCain), vodka and wine are her preferred drinks. Bill, is the one who can't drink worth a damn.

Also, she did learn how to shoot as a little girl during summers in Scranton. As far as hunting, she did it as a dare and bagged a duck. Chelsea didn't talk to her for days for killing that duck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #52
61. Why should we ask McCain, is he her new social secretary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
57. Well, besides the fact that Kerry didn't lose either, you're entirely correct...
From the Rockridge Nation web site, online home of framing guru George Lakoff:

1. What does a political candidate need to do to win voter confidence?
2. What are the traps that cause political candidates to lose credibility among the populace?

The short answer to the first question is that voters must identify with the candidate. Four things come together for this to happen. These things are values, connection, authenticity, and trust. The candidate must talk about values when discussing issues to consciously articulate the concerns that lead to political positions. The candidate must communicate values effectively to connect with people. This requires the speaker to always appear authentic so that they seem to believe what they say. A candidate who talks about values and connects with people in an authentic way will build trust, which encourages voters to select them over other candidates.

The second question can only be answered by understanding a few discoveries from the cognitive sciences about the human mind. It is not simply a matter of the policies a candidate supports. The merits of one policy over another will not win the hearts and minds of supporters who are looking for a leader that resonates with their hopes and protects them from their fears. No, what people look for in a leader is a moral connection.


http://www.rockridgenation.org/blog/archive/2007/03/12/thinking-points-discussion-of-chapter-1-winning-and-losing/?searchterm=authenticity

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
60. May be something to that, but this year the dynamics of the GE will be different.
In '04 there were a ton of hot-button State issues on the ballots and an incumbent running. Only if Hillary should win the nomination would the GOP turnout be high in nearly all States this time. McStain is not going to inspire them, that's for sure.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC