Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton loses traction over Barack Obama in Pennsylvania, Indiana (LA Times/Bloomberg Poll)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MarkInLA Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 01:54 AM
Original message
Hillary Clinton loses traction over Barack Obama in Pennsylvania, Indiana (LA Times/Bloomberg Poll)
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 01:55 AM by MarkInLA
Her formerly double-digit lead is now just a 5-point margin in Pennsylvania, a survey finds. The reduced margin makes a win for her there less significant. She trails Obama among Hoosiers.

WASHINGTON -- With three crucial Democratic primaries looming, Hillary Rodham Clinton may not be headed toward the blockbuster victories she needs to jump-start her presidential bid -- even in Pennsylvania, the state that was supposed to be her ace in the hole, a new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.

The survey found the New York senator leading Barack Obama by 5 percentage points in Pennsylvania, which votes next Tuesday. Such a margin would not give her much of a boost in the battle for the party's nomination.

What is more, the poll found Clinton trailed Obama by 5 percentage points in Indiana, another Rust Belt state that should play to her strengths among blue-collar voters.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-poll16apr16,0,4641941.story?track=mostviewed-storylevel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. And there is still time before the Primary!
So there is time for Obama to solidify this margin! He keeps it under 5 and he may walk away with more delegates!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkInLA Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would love it if next Tuesday marked the end of the "Clinton era" (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Me and you both.
Time for HRC to do the right thing, end her campaign, and get on board with the Democratic nominee so we can beat McCain in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And me. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. GOBAMA!!!
:woohoo:

Bring it home Baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. K and R
Yes We Can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
Hillary's got quite a knack for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks, Mark. Happy news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Very good.
Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Bitter Truth, Obama is surging
I had a feeling this would happen. Even with this latest gaff, Barack bounces up in the polls.

Of course if Hillary wins by a small margin, she will claim it was a big defeat, just like she did here in Texas, however, she really didn't win that large of a margin here.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfiniteNether Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is good news for Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. LATimes polls are more credible because of the info they provide...
...about the structure of the poll and how the poll was conducted.

Polls are REALLY easy to rig, in subtle ways, to produce the result you want. Most polls don't provide the information you need to assess whether the poll is valid or not. Indeed, some polling groups (Zobgy, for instance) get downright pissy when you ask!

These polling groups have a tremendous amount of power over United States' elections and, therefore, over the course and future of America.

Humans are herd animals (it's part of our survival mechanism) and, especially the "mush middle" in politics, are easily swayed by polls. If polls consistently say that Candidate A is doing better than Candidate B, voters will tend to move towards Candidate A because, if the rest of the herd is doing it, it is probably the right thing to do.

Again, this is a survival mechanism. For instance, if you hear someone shout "fire" in a theater and see everyone else rush for the doors, even if you have no objective evidence that there is, indeed, a fire going on, you will most likely join the rush for the doors.

Anyway, the LATimes polls are very good.

For more information on how you can assess a poll for validity, visit:

http://www.ncpp.org/?q=node/4
20 Questions A Journalist Should Ask About Poll Results
(National Council on Public Polls)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkInLA Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. My mother's lame theory...
I just spoke with my mother - she's a Hillary supporter. She believes that Bill and Hill are sabotaging their own campaign so that they have an "excuse" when they lose.

Uh...I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. It just depends which poll you are looking at. Some have her ahead by 9 - 14 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Force is strong with that one. No matter what they do, the Mo' always returns to Obama.
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 02:25 PM by kwenu
"They won't vote for a Black candidate.","He's a muslim", Rezco, "Only Blacks vote for him.", "He's only supported by latte liberals.", Wright, "He's unvetted.", "He only wins small states.", "He's elitist."

He is unstoppable.

The more he is attacked the stronger he becomes. :kick:


:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You can't win, Hillary. If you strike me down in Pennsylvania, I shall become more powerful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. Interesting stuff


One reason Clinton is struggling in Indiana and North Carolina is that women -- a mainstay of her coalition in earlier contests -- have been defecting. In Indiana, the poll found women split their vote, 35% for each candidate. In North Carolina, they favored Obama, 43% to 36%.

-snip

Clinton also suffers from being seen as less admirable than Obama. Even in Pennsylvania, 47% of Democrats said he had more honesty and integrity, compared with 26% who thought that of Clinton.

"She doesn't tell the truth a lot," said Brannon Crace, a store manager in Frankfurt, Ind. "We've already been through the Clinton era."

In all three states, Clinton was seen as better-equipped to handle trade and healthcare policy. But she does not appear to have been as persuasive in making a core argument of her campaign: that she would be better-prepared to lead the nation's military and foreign policy.

Asked who would be better as commander in chief, voters in North Carolina chose Obama, 45% to 28%; in Indiana, Obama was chosen 37% to 29%. Only in Pennsylvania did voters prefer Clinton as commander in chief, 44% to 39%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "We've already been through the Clinton era." Amen to that...we need CHANGE.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC