|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 04:51 PM Original message |
"Kerry's Lingering Insecurity" - Passing the national security threshold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Whoever wrote this should do his homework--Kerry is now neck & neck 48-47% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 08:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Here's a link to support you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Where was Baer in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. So the Republicans nominating an unqualified commander-in-chief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. *raises hand* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. This is a very important article....to see a very liberal publication |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. If Kerry chooses a non-FP Nat Sec running mate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. When is the Democratic party ever going to get that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 11:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Agree. VP is a 'security' position...not 'on the job training'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. I don't think I'd go that far, but we won't achieve the landslide we need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. This cuts both ways. Why shore up a weakness where the effort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. National security isn't any ordinary weakness...it's so important that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. The Repugs are going to win on 'national security' for some time to come.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. That is the right question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. If the Democratic ticket includes a VP with ZERO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 06:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. We'll always have a default threshold of support on national security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Actually it's a far higher percentage of voters than 20%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 06:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. But again, Tom, it al, comes down to resources and the EVs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 08:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. It's an honorable dance that we are doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 11:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. But the Republicans are making inroads into the Democratic base. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Even as they open up our nation to attacks and sell weapons to terrorists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
filterfish (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. Let's hear the love for Clark! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sparrowhawk (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. Which Post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 07:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Kerry said early on, and Johnson repeated recently that foreign policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-23-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. No it does not bode well for Kerry because the press and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC