Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:15 AM
Original message |
|
He has been paid $14 million already and is owed nearly $5 million more for the "brilliant" work he did running Clinton's campaign (into the ditch).
How dare he charge that much.
I wonder if he shared anything with that Paper Pit Bull, Howie Wolfson, SBE (Shit Bag Extraordinaire).
I bet I could form a company with three volunteers from DU (anybody???) and we could have done the same job for her for way under $4 million.
That would have saved Clinton $10 million, made me and three other DUers very happy, financially and otherwise, and this shitstorm would have been over long ago.
Mark Penn is not worth what he got paid to ruin Clinton's campaign.
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I Keep Reminding People that He's getting Paid over $100,000 PER DAY |
|
And for What? Hillary's Judgement Is A Complete FAILURE.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. BINGO Penn's miserable performance + ridiculous salary= HRC bad judgment |
islandmkl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:20 AM
Original message |
|
"I'm telling you...be patient...this will all kick in like I have designed it...we will have a BIG turnaround real soon. Trust me."
and send my checks, too....
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Mark Penn is a big fat 'cock-a-roach' with nine lives that can't stand the light |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes, and that begs the question who would choose that kind of incompetence? |
HooptieWagon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. To HilLiary, loyalty trumps competence. |
|
We currently are witnessing that type of leadership and it's effects. Who in their right mind would support more of the same?
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. The parallel is definitely unsettling. |
stellanoir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I've posted this before but not in a while.
Over the past several months or so, as an avid student of Tudor history, I've often been reminded of how Queen Elizabeth the first's leadership was mostly enhanced by her overwhelmingly astute discernment in choosing her advisors. Of course there were some exceptions.
Whereas Mary Queen of Scots was surrounded by power mongering, duplicitous, and manipulatively disingenuous advisors.
They cost Mary her head.
Just saying.
|
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The problem is with management. Poor judgement at the top.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message |
8. He is a good example of the sort of Judgement Hillary will excercise |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |