If you take a deep breath and look at the coverage of Reverend Jeremiah Wright in the mainstream media and how a former minister of a Presidential candidate is somehow more important that the other candidates running for office, you see that there is not only a double-standard but also a Rorschach Test on how racist America is.
First, let's look at Wright and Obama. Yes, Obama was baptized and married in Wright's Trinity Unity Church of Christ in Chicago. Does that mean that everything Wright says equals exactly to what Obama has "soaked in" by mental osmosis?
Look at what a former Republican Presidential candidate who was a minister has to say about the link between Obama and Wright:
Obama has come out many times saying that he disagrees with some of the incendiary comments that Wright has made. However, Hillary Clinton, John McCain and the Beltway pundits of the mainstream media continue to act like it is an "issue". If Obama has repeatedly stated that he disagreed with some of Wright's YouTubed looped comments, when is it enough for the Hillary Clinton, John McCain and the Beltway pundits?
Because neither are what I would consider honest, the answer is never.
So what does the mainstream media do when Jeremiah Wright speaks at a couple conferences? They broadcast the speeches, sometimes in full. Despite whether one agrees with Wright on the content of his statements or otherwise, exactly why does the former pastor of a Presidential candidate and of a small church get such dedicated coverage? Perhaps his speeches have longer coverage than the Pope's recent visit.
Yes, he is animated. Yes, he's loud. Yes, for many, he is profound.
However, in the eyes of someone who has never seen a black minister preach, it is also a source for stereotyping not only him but the African-American Church. Is the mainstream media now going to cover every speech he makes in every venue in half-hour blocks and then have beltway pundits give their "analysis" of what he said? There are already inferences that this coverage is "hurting" Obama and that Obama needs to cut Wright off at the knees.
The dual messages about the Democratic Presidential race have been framed in obvious form to play off each other.
First, even though Obama has won many states where working class whites supported him, the Big Question is whether he can get their support. Even though Obama chipped away a 20+% lead and lost by 9.2% and where Clinton only got less than a dozen more delegates in Pennsylvania, the message being hammered is whether Obama can EVER get working class whites to support him. Short-term memory would indeed hide that he won states like Iowa, Louisiana, Colorado and other states where he got a lot of support from them.
Secondly, the mainstream media wants to play the videos (now chock full of new soundbites to take out of context) of Jeremiah Wright to test the perception that the working class whites can handle his animated, controversial style and not just fall into classifying him as some "uppity" black.
So you see the framed messages go back and forth: Do whites like Obama and then Is Wright a Loudmouth? Repeat...repeat...repeat...
Why hasn't the mainstream media done coverage of Reverend Hagee, who McCain practically pleaded for his endorsement (
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/29/john-hagees-mccain-endor_n_89189.html)? Why no coverage of Hillary Clinton's links to the conservative "The Fellowship" where she seeks spiritual solace with members of the neocon agenda (
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html)?
Why isn't the mainstream media doing full coverage of Barack Obama's CURRENT pastor of the Trinity United Church of Christ, Otis Moss? You'd think the current pastor would be more important?
I know. Thankfully, there are no other problems in the World that need any investigation or intense coverage on. Wright's on!