Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you rather have Kerry or Nader as President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:41 PM
Original message
Poll question: Would you rather have Kerry or Nader as President?
Kerry. Even if we assume Nader isn't a right wing plant, his egomania wouldn't let him get shit done. He'd just rip the nation apart even further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I voted Kerry...
...and I'm not even that fond of Kerry. Used to admire Nader, but something has missfired up there in his noggin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nader
has no business even thinking he could be President. He has no constituency, no allies, no experience, and absolutely an awful temperament for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elcondor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree
I didn't used to be a huge fan of Kerry, but I truly think he will be a great president. If Nader ever got elected he would be the most lame-duck president of all time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why assume that Nader isn't a right wing plant?
Of course he is.

His qualification as President is that he has long been a smoother embezzler than George W. Bush. I very much doubt that Nader will continue to get away with it though. He survived this long by avoiding scrutiny of his practices. Assuming that the paranoid corrupt flake could actually win an election (and such an assumption would amount to a form of insanity worthy only of Nader-Cheney-Bush) he would be subject to scrutiny. He wouldn't be able to stand it.

I note too, that most people who have actually personally known and worked with Ralph Nader, have ended up sooner or later despising him. (A recent article in Salon covered this ground nicely.) This is hardly a lighted path to accomplishment and success. Just ask the Bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry all the way.
Nader cares more about ideas (and his ego) and lacks concern for ordinary people. Morality becomes perverted when it is divorced from people, and that certainly would be the case with Nader. As a result, I don't want Nader anywhere near that kind of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formactv Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Lol! I GET it! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nader would just get bored
just like he has with every other project he has started.

He would only care if it dealt with corporations, anything else wouldnt interested him...choice, affirmative action, judiciary, defense, etc...all those things would be secondary and he wouldnt have a plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kerry. This isn't even close.
I would rather vote for Joe Lieberman than Ralph Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Without a doubt
my choice would be Kerry.

From what I saw of Nader's debate with Dr. Dean, Nader looked more like a right wing puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nader vs Lieberman would be a better poll for DU.
I can see that one breaking 50/50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. More like Nader vs. Zell Miller
Which butthead would be a better turncoat to get the Chimp back in the White House?

It's a tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feistydem Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nader has gone off the deep end...
which is too bad. He's squandered his legacy by not being able to let go of his self-important ambitions. Instead of continuing as a tireless advocate for the underdog, he's become a delusional megalomaniac with a chip on his shoulder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. Whaaaa???
Sixteen people voted for Nader? :wtf: All I can say is they must not know too much about him then, or they are only remembering when he was a crusader for the downtrodden masses who were victims of heartless corportations.

I used to have a lot of respect for Nader back in the good old days when he was a consumer advocate but that has become a distant memory because he has done such a complete one-eighty.

He has become obsessed, and so consumed with self-importance he is incapable of seeing of the detrimental effect he is having on the election. He doesn't really care about people on a personal level and has little compassion for those whose health and welfare will be jeopardized by another Bush term. He is tone-deaf to anything that doesn't fit into his plans and blind to way the negative way people are reacting to him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kerry
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 03:13 AM by fujiyama
I was especially impressed with him and Teresa on CNN the other day.

I liked the response he gave for what he thought happened on 9/11. He said, he could tell immediately that it wasn't "pilot error". I'm prone to be skeptical of politicians' sincerity, but I really believe there was a stern competance in him. I also don't believe he'd sit in a classroom for 7 minutes absolutely cluess reading a book about a goat.

As for Nader, he's a has been. He's a hack, that gets money from RWers, gets airtime by Rupert Murdoch, and has no clue on how politics works. I also don't trust his temprement. While he definetely wouldn't be as bad a president as Bush, there are some similarilties between him and Bush -- he has a HUGE ego and is extremely arrogant. He's like Cheney in some ways also -- when he can't criticize someone substantively, he goes after irrelevant things -- like Michael Moore's weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaTeacher Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nader could not govern
I don't think Nader is a RW hack, he had been true to the same message for nearly 30 years.

However, I do not think he is capable of governing. I don't see him as a great leader. Also, if he was lucky enough to get elected (as a Green), he would have no congress. Would the Democrats and Republicans support him or give him gridlock? He would not have any Senators etc supporting him, much less majorities.

It would be very hard to govern in the current system....he would be a quite powerless president. But--I do not criticize the man, he does have principles, and he is quite true to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Nad(i)r
Ewwwwwwwwwww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Beyond that
the man seems incapable of dealing with anyone who doesn't agree with his point of view. That's an absolutely impossible way to act when you're supposed to be a President of all people.

Nader's self-righteous, pompousness would not make for a good President.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. Nader's 15 minutes are coming to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Nader would SUCK as a president
Based on his delusional, egomaniacal childishness, he would suck.

He's not a leader. He's just as much of a "corporatist" as any that he points his miserly finger at. He's a goddamn phony asshole.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is This a Trick Question? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Newsflash: Nader doesn't WANT to be president
I honestly think that if polls showed that Nader had a shot of getting elected, he wouldn't run. I don't think he actually wants the responsibility that comes with holding elective office. Running as a third party candidate gives him the "freedom" to rant and rave about corporatist corruption without having the responsibility to advocate proposals that actually stand a chance of passing. This is why he has publicly stated that he wouldn't accept any position in a Kerry administration. It's why he's never sought an office (e.g., House of Representatives, the Senate) that he could conceivably get elected to. Now perhaps years ago it might have made sense to argue that he would have greater influence outside of government, but that is obviously not the case now -- now he has absolutely NO influence on government, and his latest third party bid isn't likely to change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kerry, obviously
Nader is no more qualified to be president than I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'd vote for Bush before I'd vote for Nader
And then I'd move to New Zealand.

OK, not really about the voting for Bush part. But probably true about the moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Push-poll much?
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 02:29 PM by Zhade
Edited to add: Nader can fuck himself, but this is a pointless vanity thread I should have ignored.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC