MattNC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:06 AM
Original message |
Rasmussen NC: Obama (49) ; Clinton (40) |
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
1. We'll win there no matter what. |
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Expected, but not so terrible |
|
I don't like that Rasmussen is polling on Wright. The way they slanted the question sounds almost like a push poll.
|
MattNC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Listed at 74-10 in favor of Obama. Undervalues Obama's support if recent trends are accurate.
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
4. but he also has IN in play for Obama Obama within 5 adn 13% undecided |
thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
5. His lead among African Americans is 74% to 10% |
|
Edited on Fri May-02-08 10:21 AM by thewiseguy
So you have 16% of African Americans are undecided at this point and given their turnout will be around 35%, that is about a 6% further bump for him.
I think Obama will carry NC by at least 15%.
|
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. yep, that will be much higher. Both ARG and Zogby out today show bigger leads for Obama. |
marzellino
(14 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message |
|
NC will be the nail in the coffin.
|
Life Long Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri May-02-08 10:37 AM by Life Long Dem
delete dupe
|
Life Long Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-02-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Rasmussen NC: Shows 2 point gain for Obama |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |