Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHO CARES?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:57 PM
Original message
WHO CARES?!
Are we talking about the economy? The Iraq war? The environment? Health care?

No.

Thank you Hillary for dragging this on. Democrats are destroying each other and McCain will win in November because of it.

Then Hillary can run again in 2012. This has been her plan ever since losing Wisconsin.

Shame on her and shame on all of you who have fallen for it. Every single dollar you have given to her has been one less dollar McCain needed to spend to attack Obama, one less dollar Obama could've spent to attack McCain.

And for the next FOUR MONTHS, this is going to continue. WrightGate and KantorGate, PlagiarismGate and BitterGate, and on and on. No issues; just destruction of the Democratic party.

Hillary Clinton is scum.
:puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I certainly don't..... it's a non-story....


but so was fingergate, snubgate, Ayersgate, etc......




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny, but none of those issues mattered to YOU when Wright was news
Edited on Fri May-02-08 04:10 PM by DJ13
Its going to get bumpy for the Clinton supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. LOL, I think you have the OP confused with someone else
Given the posting history, I think s/he would take great offense at being called a Clinton supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Then I apologize to him for the body of my post
But the title still is relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems to me they're both dragging this on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:03 PM
Original message
Yeah...Obama should turn his pledged delegate lead over to Edwards
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nope, but if they both turned them over to Gore I'd be happy
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well your perceptions were never really grounded in reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Like your perception that Obama has already won?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hillary has basically been mathematically eliminated from contention
Edited on Fri May-02-08 04:18 PM by Cali_Democrat
Just like when the news networks called PA for Hillary when only 6% of the vote was counted and there was only a 10 point differential. She hadn't officially won, but there was no denying the mathematical certainty.

Hillary's goal now is to drag this out so that she can do enough damage to hurt his chances against McCain. Then she can run in 2012 and say, "I told ya so."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Obama is running against John McCain
I'm not sure what Hillary thinks she is doing. She is smart enough to know that she is not going to be the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's because supporters of each candidate get
pulled into the Rove style attacks, which mostly have not come from the other campaign. I've said repeatedly that Clinton and Obama have both run fairly clean campaigns and actually haven't attacked too badly, despite what overly sensitive supporters of each believe.

Heaven forbid that people discuss the issues. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. GOP - Media wants you to concentrate on real issues?
Paaashaw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. No matter what, no matter
who else seems the focus, it is the MSM, first last and always that is the prime villain as media supplanting citizens and candidates totally in their demeaning spin of the process. We are all the Sneetches to their McBean and McCain until we take them headon each and every single time they act this stupid trying to make us look stupid(or at least more stupid than we really are).

This impunity does no service to the people who DO get the point about the media interference and purposeful folly. They only need gutsy leadership in throwing their stuff back in the only viable direction- right back at their corporate faces. When you fall instead into writhing in the trap and grant them their illegitimate status you lose against anti-democratic forces everywhere. It is not the in scale piddling and inevitable primary pressures but the unimpeded media assault that is the danger to us all without exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. She is lower than scum - she is maggot excrement. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC