Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tucker Carlson predicts Nader will drop out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wish_I_could_vote Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 08:41 AM
Original message
Tucker Carlson predicts Nader will drop out
On Hardball this morning, Tucker Carlson predicted that Nader would drop out of the race shortly after the Dem convention. Anyone else getting any vibes about this? Or is that annoying twit yanking my chain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. motivation?
I wonder what Tucker's motivation is? Usually these r-w shills are all on the same key with their talking points.

Truly puzzled by this one.


Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Maybe he wants us to lower our guard?
If I really believed that, I would probably feel better about Nader and give him some slack. In other words, I definitely think Tucker is pulling our collective chain (or trying to). Some things and people will never change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That must be it . Tucker doesn't want Democrats to....
...challenge Nader's signatures to get on the ballot, so he's spreading falsehoods that Nader will drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's the same manipulation tactic they have used on Dems for decades.
The message is, just shut the FUCK up and we'll be nice. Promise! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Or maybe
he was just offering an opinion with no ulterior motives. People do that, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Tucker's track record would indicate otherwise.
The firmest tenet in psychology is: "the greatest predictor of future behavior is past behavior".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Maybe Nader will drop Camejo and ask Tucker to be his running mate
They both have the huge ego factor in common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Uh Oh--Nader's staying in.
Tucker Carlson, the guy who ate the cake made to look like a shoe when Hillary's book became a best seller. That Tucker Carlson?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Did Tucker say
He would eat a Corvair if he was wrong about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's an idiot with zero access.
I don't pay attention to him when he says things I don't like. Why would I pay any attention to him now? Probably just roiling the waters. Ef him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. His Ego Won't Let Him
No way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom22 Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Chris Matthew's Follow up
question was "Will Nade announce this at the Democratic Convention?" I think somebody knows something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Only if
Nader suddenly loses his massive, massive ego and messiah complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fucker, oh I mean Tucker, is wrong all the time.
He eats a shoe a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Agree In Part . . .
Carlson is a shill who has certainly shown all the negative tendencies everyone here has mentioned, in abundance.

However, over the past few months I've detected a little reformation on his part. He's still a worm, but I think he may have felt which way the wind was blowing, or something. In any event, I wouldn't distrust this information just because it comes from Bow-Tie Boy - - especially if Tweety picked right up on it.

Moreover, the move by Nader would make sense. We've all concluded that his presence in American politics is about feeding his ego; but his current campaign, shunned by the Greens and unlikely to make the ballot in enough states even to register on the national radar screen, is not really going to be any kind of ego boost for him. Even more significantly, he's not likely to make the difference in the election this time around, either.

So, the most efficient way, looking at things from Ralphie's perspective (and this is not easy), to try to massage that ego of his might very well be to drop out and be welcomed by the Democrats with open arms, receive some sort of bone thrown his way in the party platform, etc. That's why his dropping out is logical. Don't disbelieve it just because it comes from Tucker. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wish_I_could_vote Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree with this:
"However, over the past few months I've detected a little reformation on his part. He's still a worm, but I think he may have felt which way the wind was blowing, or something. In any event, I wouldn't distrust this information just because it comes from Bow-Tie Boy - - especially if Tweety picked right up on it."

Tucker boy has been toning it down. He used to make me so angry that, despite being a retired female with failing health, I believe I could have taken him on and knocked the crap out of him. Now he just annoys me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Tucker told the world
that Karen Hughes lies through her teeth. He thinks she's mentally ill. Kos has a post about it here:

http://www.dailykos.net/archives/004159.html

Here's a sample:

Then I heard that Karen Hughes accused me of lying. And so I called Karen and asked her why she was saying this, and she had this almost Orwellian rap that she laid on me about how things she'd heard -- that I watched her hear -- she in fact had never heard, and she'd never heard Bush use profanity ever. It was insane.

I've obviously been lied to a lot by campaign operatives, but the striking thing about the way she lied was she knew I knew she was lying, and she did it anyway. There is no word in English that captures that. It almost crosses over from bravado into mental illness.

While I always assumed Karen Hughes was mentally ill (the same goes for the entire Chickenhawk Cabal), it's nice seeing a solid conservative confirming my assumptions.

p.s. Tucker also calls O'Reilly a "humorless phony". He nailed that one on the head!


I'm beginning to think Tucker is more a libertarian than rw conservative. Interesting, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. wow, was that ever interesting!
Missed that bit about TC calling Karen Hughes mentally ill. I find that this observation of his extremely creepy:

There is no word in English that captures that. It almost crosses over from bravado into mental illness.

There is something so wrong with that woman. Everytime I see her chills run up and down my spine. I don't even like the way she talks--something icky about the way her mouth moves. Also, her eyes are sort of disjointed. They don't line up right. And then marrying that old guy and the kid and the whole bit....sick scene.


Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. probably depends on how many signatures he's collecting
if he's slow to get signings, why bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. Only to reenter later in the fall...
oops wrong election....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. You missed what followed....
He predicted that Nader would drop out. Then said, "So the winner of the election will win both the popular and electoral vote."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amarant Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. He will
I don't know why everyone is so worried about him this time around. What do you think he and kerry talked about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC