Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

++Undeclared Superdelegates-- Are they hoping to run out the clock???++

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:51 PM
Original message
++Undeclared Superdelegates-- Are they hoping to run out the clock???++
Edited on Sun May-04-08 07:52 PM by rhombus
How do you explain undeclared superdelegates like Sen. Jim Webb whose states have already voted? Webb is the last guy to run from a fight, and yet he's squeamish to declare who he'd vote for?

I think these undeclared delegates are afraid to take a stand. Is this political cowardice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think they're waiting for Obama to pick up the majority of the pledged delegates
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:28 PM by rocknation
which he should do no later than May 20.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think it's actually May 20.
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:05 PM by FlyingSquirrel
Obama has: 1490

IN: 33
NC: 62
WV: 11

Total: 1596 on May 13 (+/- 5)

KY 16
OR 27

Total: 1639 on May 20 (+/- 7)

1627 needed for 50% plus 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. May 20, right you are!
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:03 PM by rocknation
:blush:

It will really depend on whether Obama can get at around 40% of KY and WV.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't that whats wrong with our party; political timidity?
We know how to kneecap our own, it appears, but we don't know how to be principled in our stance and be tough in that respect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I think it has more to do with making sure Hillary
can't kneecap THEM.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think it is more that they don't want to make her supporters feel that she was
treated unfairly and that she had every chance to win but failed on her own merits not because a bunch of men told her to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Oh! Well, um, that's what I MEANT...
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:16 PM by rocknation
:blush:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are waiting for the highest bidder
It's a little game of musical chairs... how long can you hold out
and increase your value? But if you wait too long or choose poorly,
you lose everything. Fascinating to watch them play. Keep track
of who gets what favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. THe problem with waiting is that May 31st is when the rules-by-laws committee
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:00 PM by 4themind
meats, the results of which could be a nuclear bomb on this race. The clock is ticking. They need to start coming coming out, before P.R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wyden is protecting his health care proposal
He doesn't want his endorsement to be interpreted as a preference of one health care proposal over another. He's got his own that he is really pushing and that's his priority. At least that's what he has said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes. They are wimping out. They don't want to make a decision...
If they haven't decided yet, they get no benefit from deciding now, but they CAN get some flack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is just a theory on my part, but ...
I believe the SDs already know it's going to be Obama.

They have no desire to humiliate the Clintons (or enrage Hill's supporters by doing so), therefore they've agreed on a slow trickle of endorsements - two for Obama, one for Hill, four for Obama, two for Hill per day - thereby avoiding a 'surge' of endorsements for either candidate.

It's just a theory - but at this juncture, it would be the smart thing to do. Hill will have a few more 'wins' in the weeks to come, and can go out on a high note rather than being publicly humiliated.

As I said, just a theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC