Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For more than 20 years Hillary attended a church that discriminates against gays.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:53 PM
Original message
For more than 20 years Hillary attended a church that discriminates against gays.
So, why did Hillary remain with a faith for ALL HER LIFE that excludes persons based upon sexual preference? I guess this means that she agrees with the United Methodist Church doctrine that homosexuals are "incompatable with Christian teachings." Isn't it time for Hillary to denounce the United Methodist Church leadership for this bigoted philosophy?

From church doctrine materials:

"the United Methodist Church does support the inclusion of homosexuals in the congregation, and homosexuals can take part in sacraments and programs. However, the UMC does state that 'the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching,' so the church does not allow homosexuals to become ordained ministers. The UMC will not conduct homosexual marriages and will not allow them to be held in their churches."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. why does hillary support bigots like that?
any of her supporters wish to explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I can't. This woman has clearly dedicated her life to homophobia, imperialism and torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
54. LOL - nonsense like that gets to be funny after a while - plus her Church "blesses" gay couples
Some folks do really get upset with gay "marriage" - even some folks who aren't into "homophobia, imperialism and torture"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. the deafening sound of crickets will abound here. there is no defense.
Plus, it only supports her lack of a problem in using dog whistle terms like, "San Francisco," when describing Obama's supposed elitism.

If Hillary was pro-gay, then she would at least make a statement explaining how she has stuck with a church that discriminates against gays.

As an aside, she and George Bush share the same religious denomination. 'Nuff said.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. See post #13 and then get back to me. {EOM}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. See post #14 and then get back to me. n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. See post #16 and don't get back to me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. See post #16 and then get back to me. {EOM}
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:21 PM by The Night Owl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Can't...that's a post from someone who was lucky enough to be on my ignore list. n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. Copy it for him
he put me on ignore the last time I called him on his hypocrisy regarding this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Yeah... The folks at TUCC at least have the decency to serve breakfast while bashing gays...
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:14 PM by The Night Owl
A TUCC style gay bashing prayer breakfast...

Prayer Breakfast
March 31, 2007 • 8:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Monument of Faith Church • 2750 West Columbus Ave. • Chicago, Illinois
Guest Speaker: Rev. Sean McMillan, Pastor, Giant Steps Church

Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Fornicators,
idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, 10thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers—none of
these will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And this is what some of you used to be. But you were washed, you
were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God. —1 Corinthians 6-9–11


http://www.tucc.org/upload/tuccbulletin_mar11.pdf

I guess some at TUCC feel that nothing goes better with breakfast than telling people that they're going to go to Hell.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. {tumbleweeds roll past}
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:26 PM by The Night Owl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. {sun goes down}
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:27 PM by The Night Owl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
42. {crickets chirp}
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:27 PM by The Night Owl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
46. Well, that's religion for ya.
They all tell me I'm going to Hell for one thing or another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
60. You know that that's part of that "bible" thing, right?
The ignorance is staggering.

While the bible comes off as a pretty smutty and questionable book at times, quoting it is pretty standard practice for, you know, churches. How about you try judging them based on their actions and attitudes rather than the thousand-plus year old holy book, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
77. So pretty much everybody is going to helll.....


that's basically the consistent theme across the board for Christian churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're not gay
I've never seen you speak out in favor of equal rights for gays.

So why the sudden interest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Is that a qualification for concern on the topic?
I personally think the whole pastor gotcha game is freaking ludicrous (of course since I was raised Catholic, my church has discriminated against almost everyone at one time or another and is still horrible on women's issues and gay rights). But seriously, did everyone who jumped on the Rev. Wright issue have a long history of speaking out against whatever the hell it was they found so offensive? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I just think it's amusing that people who have never been advocates for this issue
now conveniently play partisan politics with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I am not gay and I have been an advocate for equal rights since I volunteered at GMHC in the 80s
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:14 PM by Stephanie
And I think the gay vote for Hillary has been totally swindled. She does not support gay marriage. She has never supported gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Well then you have some credibility
Obama has never supported marriage equality either, so I'm not sure I get your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I think that the community's support of HRC because of an early Obama campaign mistake is misguided
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:19 PM by Stephanie
Check his site, he has better marriage equality proposals than she does. He advocates extending all of the hundreds of federal marriage rights to same sex couples. It is a larger step legally than anyone has proposed so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I think most gays and lesbians who are interested and involved
have already checked out both candidate's websites, know the issues thoroughly and have already made up their minds. Don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. I think there is certainly a segment who are less informed and could be swayed by a single story
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:25 PM by Stephanie
McClurkin certainly was a deal-breaker for some of my friends here. They have not been open to seeing it as an isolated incident. And yet Obama's proposals are better for civil rights for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. they are roughly equal on GLBT issues
Clinton has spoken out specifically about gay teenagers, quite movingly, and she also speaks of a profound experience for her: her father died being tended to by the gay male couple next door. Her father had been a complete homophobe until this couple befriended Clinton's parents and, slowly, he changed because of his relationship with them. She gets it. Completely. I think Obama's heart is in the right place, but I haven't heard him say anything that makes me believe that he understands on a very gut level, what these issues are about. He's got all the right positions, but they seem to me to be a litany of where he thinks he should be as a good liberal. I hope that changes as he experiences more of life. And it's just my impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. Actions speak louder than words.
What has she done??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. Well, symbolically, she's marched in a couple of gay rights parades
which is an important public gesture (Obama has not, even though Chicago has a big parade).

More substantively: She fought tooth and nail in 2006 to prevent the Const. Amendment from passing, working very closely with Joe Solmonese. She's a co sponsor of ENDA and the hate crimes legislation. She supports federal rights for gay couples who have civil unions or marriages in their home states.

Obama has been criticized in the Chicago gay community for doing virtually nothing while he was a State Senator. I don't know if that's true or not, but I've read a number of reports of folks making the same criticism I expressed earlier: he does not seem very interested.

Here is a report card on how both stand on the issues:

http://a4.g.akamai.net/f/4/19675/0/newmill.download.akamai.com/19677/anon.newmediamill/pdfs/Questionnaire_ReportCard.pdf

As I noted above, their positions are very similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
72. Goddess deliver us
from straight concern trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. there sure are a lot of em floating around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #72
81. Oh so sorry, did I step in your wading pool?
Having watched HRC performance in New York these past seven years, she has not done shit for gay people, she supported DOMA, she has equivocated on every question and it's been impossible to get her to commit to anything. My opinion is not invalidated based on my sexuality, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Oh so equal rights issues are "CONVENIENT" for Hillary supporters?
Some of us heterosexuals have ALWAYS been against discrimination against people who are not heterosexual, we also have been WHITE all our lives, do we have to change skin color to speak out against racial discrimination, too? You make no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. The proper comparison would be if someone
who never gave a rat's ass about civil rights or racial equality before this election suddenly became "outraged" and accused the opposing candidate of being soft on civil rights. An election conversion, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. You have no justification for making such a claim.
Your personal opinion doesn't constitute evidence that someone doesn't care about equality. You're just using that accusation as a club to try and attack anybody who's not on the side of your preferred candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Not at all
I've had this conversation previously with this OP, as he's tried to use this issue before as a wedge. He got very agitated when he was called on it by a number of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. And I've previously had this conversation with you.
Therefore, by your rules, I have just as much authority as you do to decree that you don't care about equality, but are simply trying to beat up other candidates' supporters.

Or, we could conduct a conversation like ADULTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. The difference is
I have spoken out about this issue, loudly, long before this election. My views on this are not defined by the Clinton/Obama race. I will remain interested in and vocal about this issue long after this cycle.

The OP cannot say the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, how does that compare with Obama's church, United Church of Christ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Unfavorably. The UCC is significantly more liberal than the UMC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Obama's congregation does NOT marry gay couples
they could, because the parent church allows it. But they have decided not to.

UCC congregations can vote to become "open and affirming."

Trinity has not voted to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. That does not change the fact that the UCC's position is more liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. The entire OP is ridiculous to begin with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. How so, pray tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. As are the chicken littles who run around worrying about Wright's "hate-filled" preaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
71. I have actually defended Wright on a couple of occasions
even wrote an OP about this particular issue and his statements regarding his feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. The UCC became the first mainline Christian denomination to support same-sex marriage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. See post #16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Well, let me put it to you this way...
My fiance is openly bisexual and we're both poly.

She's UCC.

Her church has no problems with her sexuality or preference.

UCC is a very open and liberal Christian church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. And, btw, "sexual preference" is offensive. It implies one can "change"
It's an orientation.

You should know these things if you're going to feign outrage about issues you could give a shit about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
55. It's not "feigned" outrage.
If you're going to be a puritanical fool, and reject the efforts or aid of anybody who doesn't meet your purity test of the one true way to act right down to the language, then you're setting yourself up for continual alienation, disregard, and failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
70. It most certainly is feigned outgrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
75. And so see no room for a neutral orientation, where choice is a factor?


Most bisexuals I know, it is a choice.

Is there no room for bi in the center of the hetro/homo spectrum, where which direction taken does come down to a choice?


Seems sometimes the so called advocates for freedom and choice wish to rigidly define sexuality as forcefully as the psycho christian homophobes do. It is what it is, and for some there is a choice, while for others there is no choice.

To try and apply a rigid framework encompassing all sexuality, is ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Since homophobia is still acceptable among some of those who consider themselves Christian,
this won't even be a blip on the radar, but it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Just bringing it up to illustrate a point and put it out there as a useful retort.
This point should be brought up every time Hillary or one of her supporters goes into the "well, why did he (Obama) stay in the pews for 20 years?" routine.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Her own particular church
"The Foundry" in Mt. Pleasant is very gay-friendly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Is that church part of the United Methodist Church system?
If so, then "gay friendly" or not, that church is bound by the dictates of the UMC doctrine.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. I know very little about how Christians organize themselves
I'm just telling you that her church is openly friendly to gay members and same-sex unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. If it is a church that is part of the United Methodist system, then NO gay marriage.
They probably call it anything they want, but I can almost guarantee you that her church does not provide binding legal or ceremonial services for same sex unions. Maybe something symbolic, but nothing that would provide recognition from the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Trinity (Obama's congregation) does not marry gay couples either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. It's the marriage licence from the state that provides recognition from the state.
You really don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I know that Hillary remains with a religion that discriminates based upon sexual preference.
You can slice or dice it anyway you like, but her church is part of the United Methodist Church system, which has clear and codified doctrine discriminating against gays and stating that "homosexuality is incompatable with Christian teachings." If she really supports homosexual rights, then why remain with this religion or remain silent in the face of obvious bigotry?

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. {pssssst...since you have decided to be DU's very own Harvey Milk...
and that's really cool and all, I figured I should let you know that you shouldn't say "sexual preference." Only homophobes and freeper trash use that term.}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. he's a bit slow on the learning curve
when I last challenged him on this, he blew a gasket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #44
74. You lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. OMG
a Christian church that won't marry gay-people!

Why can't the UMC get with the rest of all the Christian denominations that support Gay marriage!

(BTW -- The State recognizes marriages through --are ya ready? -- paperwork filed with the State)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. The pastor of Foundry Methodist,
which is Hillary's congregation in Washington, has recently announced that the church will conduct blessings for gay couples.

Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Will that church consecrate a gay Bishop? Is a "blessing" the same as marriage?
tried again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It's more than Obama's congregation, Trinity, will do
if you want to get stupid about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. Uhm, you're aware that no church can conduct a marriage
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:23 PM by okasha
without a license from the civil government, no? Does DC issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples?

And individual churches don't consecrate bishops. Would delegates from Foundry vote for a gay bishop? Very likely.

Tried again and failed again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Gays are from San Francisco, and Hillary don't like no San Francisco elitists (unless she's fund-
raising there for the hundredth time).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. But, but, but...
I thought she was a lesbian!

I am so confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #50
61. James Carville says that she has three testicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. He would know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. How would he know? Is there hanky-panky going on there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Don't tell Mary.
She is a bitch on wheels and will be jealous all the way around, if you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chyjo Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
62. She hates gay people
And Democratic activists\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
64. How could she stay in a church like that. I would have left
oh, wait a minute, I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
76. Oh my god how could she stay in this hate filled gay bashing church?


Unless she supports everything every member of the church has ever said?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
78. and she sat there for 20 years and said nothing?
too bad that doesn't slap her in the head like a limp tuna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
79. We need a UU president
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. We had one. His name was Taft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC