Does Hillary's "Decider" stance change the laws of economics? n/t

[stevietheman]

n/t

[DevonRex]

1. Good question. nt

[DMorgan]

2. YES, Hillary is an ALL POWERFUL WOMAN! She can

do ANYTHING, or promise ANYTHING, or say ANYTHING, because she is entitled to win this election!

And I am entitled to $28 in gas tax savings, so that I can buy a house that won't be foreclosed upon, and I want to be a millionaire too...I am waiting for Hillary to promise me that, too!

[leaningprog]

3. she can't stop fighting long enough to be a leader, and it's terminal

Both Clintons are brilliant and skilled people, but this is
the very heart of my disappointment with them, not the slimey
tactics they have endured and now mastered in their political
repertoire.

When you run a country or a campaign strictly on short term
public opinion polls and opportunistic nuances, you have a
rudderless zeitgeist that leaves you surfing up on the wave
of the moment, and staying away from the hard choices and goals
it takes to lead.

2 years into Bill's first term the polarized Congress turned
Republican and tied him up for the next 6 years. He was also
unable to give Gore the sort of boost an untainted and respected
president could have.

Were Hillary to win, we would see the polarization of this campaign
on steroids, the news media would see it as a golden age of scat
and smear sufficient to drive their ratings to the moon, and we
would experience the same old sick and constipated Washington that
has dithered around burping up money and sticking each other in the
rump with daggers.