Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Is Not A "Born Again" Populist!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:13 PM
Original message
Hillary Is Not A "Born Again" Populist!
She is a panderer and a liar.

Populists believe the policies they propose will help people whereas a panderer and a liar just says popular things without any real intention of actually do anything to help.

A populist would never propose letting the oil companies steal $9 billion more when they're already collecting record profits just to win a few votes. A pandering liar, however, would do it in a heartbeat.

It's important that we remember the difference.

This has been a DU service announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Suspending the gasoline tax takes away a RW talking point.
That might be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It might, if a majority agreed with her
but even Republicans say say it's a bad idea by a small majority, per the recent CBS/NYT poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Talking D*cks on RW Radio
Constantly talk about how the poor oil companies suffer and that their profit margin is less than "the government's"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It could also take away a bridge or two. But so long as Hillary wins, right?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Do you honestly think that the Transportation & Federal Highway Fund would not get an offset from
The general fund?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And where will that money come from? Should we just ask China for another loan?
I can't wait till I'm cruising down the Peking Interstate. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Which is it?
Either the fund will be offset or not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I very much doubt it would. There's no place to take the money from.
Do you really think that this country can run on China's money forever or do you agree that we need to start managing our budget and stop wasting money to pander for votes?

Which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What programs do you recommend we cut?
We ARE in serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I first suggest we cut the proposal to eliminate the gas tax.
We need those funds, desperately, and there is no place to take the money from to replace them.

Seriously, prodn2000, we can go back and forth with games all day but the idea that cutting out the gas tax for the summer wouldn't hurt this country is ridiculous. We need that tax in place.

My own opinion is that we could save buckets of cash if we were to get out of Iraq then suspend most, if not all, of these contractors who are currently doing the work that the soldiers used to do such as cooking, cleaning, office work, etc... Those menial jobs give a soldier time away from the front lines during wartime which boosts their mental health. It also saves tons of money.

Any disagreements with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I very much agree about the contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. So why don't we agree on the gas tax "holiday"?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Not everyone agrees on every point.
And we can still be civil.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'm all for being civil, but I honestly want to know why you support it.
I've been asking for days and not one person has come out and told me how it is effectively a good plan. I've had people say it's a good idea but they never back that up with any logical answer for why.

If we could have an honest, no insults allowed, debate on that, I'd be a happy guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ok, I will give this a shot. No laughing!
1. Independent Owner/Operators are getting slammed by the price of diesel. The >20 cent per gallon relief will go a long towards keeping them in business and their homes from being foreclosed on. Trucking is all about margin, and if they are just breaking-even, that is a very bad thing.

2. I think that if the oil companies DID increase the wholesale price of unleaded gasoline in response to the suspension of the tax, that would create an easy to prove direct cause/effect relationship. That would do much for the case of a windfall profits tax. The federal gasoline tax is collected by the wholesaler from the gas station or retailer at time of delivery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I'm not laughing. I think that truckers do need help.
However, wouldn't the wiser solution be to provide tax credits that replicate the Earned Income Tax Credit for business use of a vehicle so that money is refunded regardless of taxable income? That way it would go back into the pockets of those who need it without increasing consumption or giving the oil companies an excuse to increase prices.

As for the windfall profits tax, there's very little hope of that passing in either a repub or Democratic congress. The current system allows for lobbying and political contributions to PACs and the oil companies use both to their fullest possibilities. There is no way short of a complete political revolution (which neither Dem candidate represents) that this will change for the better.

If you agree with my second point, wouldn't you say my first is the better way to go as it will not jeopardize our infrastructure and thousands of jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yours is a good idea. A very good idea.
EIC can even be pre-paid. That makes it very effective.

Our infrastructure is FUBARd as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thanks. I didn't know EIC could be pre-paid. That would make it a big help.
So why doesn't someone propose that? It seems an easy, vote attracting, responsible way of dealing with the worst of the problem without screwing with infrastructure funds. It would likely pass congress and maybe even skirt a presidential veto.

It's a shame that NEITHER of our candidates has come up with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Telling the truth about what gas taxes do and how little we each really pay would do more
If you want to take away a RW talking point, you point out the absurdity of it, you don't non ands say yeah! what the GOP spews!

Most people know that. Hillary's campaign seems to be more in favor of Rove methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. The Clintons felt the same way about DOMA and flag burning
and welfare as we knew it and NAFTA and don't ask don't tell, oh and about standing up against that criminal enterprise in Iraq. At what point does 'taking away a RW talking point' become being RW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Excellent points. You should expand that into a thread.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's pretty much a given
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. If she thought she could get elected by being a pirate, then she'd become a pirate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Faux" born-again populist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. she never was a populist
she has never thought populism was a valid political movement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC