Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Love How The Term Progressive Gets Thrown Around Here, As If Some Of You Own It.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:03 PM
Original message
I Love How The Term Progressive Gets Thrown Around Here, As If Some Of You Own It.
Edited on Mon May-05-08 11:04 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
Cracks me up. Fact is, so many here are extreme progressives with minds as closed as I've ever seen. But being a narrow minded zealot doesn't make one a progressive. It never ceases to amaze me how easily some here throw the term around while seemingly holding their nose up in the air, as if they have a market on what is and isn't a progressive. Well get a grip. Progressivism is political viewpoint that probably every member of this site shares for the most part. It isn't this strict tight boundaried viewpoint that some here put it off as. In fact, the way some here throw the term around and use it almost as weapon, as if it is some elite group that only a select few can join, makes me almost embarrassed to be associated with the some of the so called progressives here. Personally, after seeing the term used over and over here I've come to the conclusion that half of the people using it and claiming to be the be all end alls of what progressivism is, have no fucking idea at all what being a progressive is. They think they do, but they don't. What they do know, is how to be a zealot.

Here's a fucking fact for ya: Hillary Clinton is technically a Progressive. Yes, she is. If you don't think she is, if you put your nose in the air and claim "Hillary is NOT a progressive! Not by a longshot! How can you say that!" then you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Hillary is a progressive. Deal with it. Educate yourself on what being a progressive actually is. K? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, noticed that myself.
Edited on Mon May-05-08 11:06 PM by Hoof Hearted
The Democratic party has a lot of "Popes" on this board. They who shall decide who is allowed into the church, and who shall be cast out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. Notice how Hillary supporters love to tell others they aren't a Democrat? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
48. I spend way too much time here and yet I've NEVER seen that. The burden is therefore
upon you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. I've had Hillary supporters tell me I wasn't a Democrat, multiple times - LOL.
At least not their kind of Dem, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
57. And I've had Sen Obama supporters
call me a freeper. Assholes are everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #48
93. How could you not have seen it? It happens often. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #48
115. I've seen it numerous times
And since I put those DUers on ignore as soon as I see that crap, no I can't post any links. But you bet it happens. A lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. I see Obama supportes do it all the time
very rarely does a Clinton supporter do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
66. Its Obama fans who shout that at Hillary fans every day. --and you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
108. Funny, the poll this morning clearly says it is your camp telling others they are not Dems
Edited on Tue May-06-08 11:38 AM by Marrah_G
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
119. No, frankly, I've NEVER seen that. Care to provide a quote or two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somehow, I don't think this message will effectively reach the target audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. The progressives voted against the holocaust in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Here:
zeal·ot Audio Help /ˈzɛlət/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a person who shows zeal.
2. an excessively zealous person; fanatic.
3. (initial capital letter) a member of a radical, warlike, ardently patriotic group of Jews in Judea, particularly prominent from a.d. 69 to 81, advocating the violent overthrow of Roman rule and vigorously resisting the efforts of the Romans and their supporters to heathenize the Jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Great. Now figure out a way to explain your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I Did Explain It.
Now figure out a way to open your mind enough to the point of letting some reality sink in, so that maybe you can understand the concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The reality that Hillary Clinton will do ANYTHING for political advantage?
Or the fact that such a person cannot possibly be considered progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
67. So will Obama. He played the pandy bear to working class voters this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #67
100. O RLY?
What did he do, propose a gas tax to save his sinking campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry, Progressives Don't Threaten To Obliterate Countries
or pass sham tax holidays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Mind Showing Me Where In The Rule Book It Says That? K? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
41. Oh Jesus. Now, nuking countries is "progressive". What the fuck ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
54. Mind Showing Me The Difference Between Her And McCain
aside from the health care issue? And Hillary might be the better friend to corporations on that one by forcing us to buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Sen Clinton voted against both
Roberts and Alito - McCain voted yes for both. Next question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
68. You don't even attempt to define what you think a progressive is.
You made an unsupported claim that H. Clinton is a progressive. without supporting that claim in any way.

People call you on your weak argument and you call them names. Typical.



Progressives fight people like this, not pander to them:





Progressives don't lie to their constituents:





Progressives don't take money for facilitating uranium deals with murderous dictators:



Progressives don't cowardly vote for unjustified carnage because of political pressure:



BOTTOM LINE: I DON'T THINK YOU KNOW WHAT THE TERM PROGRESSIVE MEANS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
71. Your lack of acknowledgement there is downright creepy. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
90. So you're this super intellectual now,man give it a break and go read a book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffrey_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
122. Or vote to go to war
eofm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unfortunately, there is literally no substitution for language so...
We will just have to continue to try to bridge the chasm of understanding with those crude symbols called words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. But Many Here Completely Abuse The Understanding Of The Word.
They take the concept to an idealogical extreme and twist it as if it were theirs to own and define. But that's not reality. In reality, the concepts of progressivism are shared by most if not all here, and are shared by Hillary as well. That's a fact. The little narrow minded in a bubble view of what being a progressive is as put forth by some here, is just nothing but ignorant silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Okay, probably best discussed issue by issue. Those labels are worn to the point of meaningless.
"Conservatives" aren't even "conservative" either.

Hell, Bill was both conservative and progressive in some ways.

Shrub is a radical. Not conservative at all on the other hand.

I understand your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogCityJohn Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. Hillary a "progressive"?
Perhaps you could point to a couple of progressive ideas shared by Hillary Clinton. Would voting for the Iraq war be one? Perhaps a vote for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment? Or should we go back to her husband's presidency (if we're on one of the days she's claiming credit for it) and look at NAFTA, which he got passed over the opposition of a majority of Democrats? Or how about that good old Defense of Marriage Act? (That's pretty progressive, especially when you sign it after calling it a divisive piece of legislation.) Maybe we could call Hillary's support of the bankruptcy bill progressive, since it certainly represented "progress" for credit card companies. Or how about her position on the Bush tax cuts?

Face it, Hillary's a run-of-the-mill DLC Democrat. Those folks may be many things, but progressive isn't one of them. No, they're not Bush, but they're a far cry from progressive. The party has always had its Tories, and Hillary is unquestionably one of them (at least these days). So go ahead and try to claim that elusive "center." But don't try to make people believe it's progressive. It isn't, and no amount of negative campaigning will make it so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #31
103. Yes, Hillary Believes In Progressivism. Deal With It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. obama's interest in invading pakistan is progressive - progressively aggressive :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Progressives don't make up shit about invading Pakistan.
Hillary supporters do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Most progressives don't lie like that.
Of course it's not like there's that big of a difference between saying you will attack a certain area on very solid intelligence, and saying you will obliterate an entire country.

Oh wait, there's a huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. short minded zealots aren't quite as bad
as narrow minded ones I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. NONE of the candidates are true progressives n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldgrowth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. I'm a Obama supporter and your right!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick/Rec.
Good post...timely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Michael Parenti -- What Progressives want?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICaUW-MrN2Q

I don't think Hillary or Obama want all of these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. First of all, I love me some Mark Twain quotes...second, I agree, but Obama's tax plans are way more
progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
85. His business deregulation plans aren't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #85
98. Oh my God! I can't believe you made me look at Krugman. Seriously though, I didn't see anything in
that article that said Obama doesn't value or promote progressive ideas when it comes to regulation.
Flexible regulations are not a Republican idea--that's the point that Krugman was making, no?

Yeah, I'm not buying your argument yet.
Convince me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. That was a smooth play of the "elitist card". +6!
shitfuck. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
125. smooth like loose, frothy stool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. I Love How The Term Democrat Gets Thrown Around Here, As If Some Of You Own It.
Cracks me up. Fact is, so many here are extreme democrats with minds as closed as I've ever seen. But being a narrow minded zealot doesn't make one a democrat. It never ceases to amaze me how easily some here throw the term around while seemingly holding their nose up in the air, as if they have a market on what is and isn't a democrat. Well get a grip. Being Democratic is political viewpoint that probably every member of this site shares for the most part. It isn't this strict tight boundaried viewpoint that some here put it off as. In fact, the way some here throw the term around and use it almost as weapon, as if it is some elite group that only a select few can join, makes me almost embarrassed to be associated with the some of the so called democrats here. Personally, after seeing the term used over and over here I've come to the conclusion that half of the people using it and claiming to be the be all end alls of what being democratic is, have no fucking idea at all what being a being democratic is. They think they do, but they don't. What they do know, is how to be a zealot.

Here's a fucking fact for ya: Hillary Clinton is technically a Democrat. Yes, she is. If you don't think she is, if you put your nose in the air and claim "Hillary is NOT a democrat! Not by a longshot! How can you say that!" then you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Hillary is a democrat. Deal with it. Educate yourself on what being a democrat actually is. K? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. True Too LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yeah, that threatening to obliterate Iran piece is awfully progressive
as is the Obama is not a Muslim 'as far as I know' bit, the McCain is more qualified to be president than Obama is, the Obama in a turban emails, the scary black preacher hit pieces, etc., etc., etc. So was voting for AUMF, NAFTA, and a whole host of other issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. good post
"Progressive" is poorly defined and relatively meaningless. It has become a matter of taste, style and fashion more that anything political, and as you point out it is a convenient excuse for being arrogant and self-righteous.

"Progressive" is becoming a tight little exclusive club more and more - an approach that is exactly opposite to that required for political success. There are daily calls for people to go away and shut up, because they expressed heresy to the doctrines of the self-proclaimed progressive elite. Clinton supporter? - we don't need 'em. People who are not taking sides in the candidate wars? - we don't need them, either. I have even seen Obama supporters who were insufficiently zealous attacked. This drive toward purging and silencing, and the self-righteousness and arrogance, only works here because it is being used against friends and allies. Once we get out into the general and are talking to the public, most people will not tolerate this and that could lead to a serious failure for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
29. Thanks. That needed to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. Progressives do not consider the nuke option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Nor support obliterating men, women, and children. Nor cite the National Review approvingly....
... nor, nor, nor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. Progressives don't support war. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Is John Kerry a progressive? How about John Edwards?
Guess not, since they voted for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
72. No, I don't think they are.
A real Progresive is far to the left of almost everyone in Congress. Dennis Kucinich is probably the only elected person I can think of who is. Sorry to screw up your snappy comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #72
106. This is exactly what the op speaks against
you are defining the word, progressive, in so narrow a way that you are defining an entity that is so marginal it will have no impact. T+I agree with Kerry's debate comment on labels - they are really meaningless and attempt to pidgeon hole people. the fact of the matter is that John Kerry is not nor ever has been a person who favors war other than as a last resort. He has said repeatedly that his vote was wrong - he though is consistent in having said he voted to get inspectors in and to give Bush leverage in the diplomacy. When it was clear that Bush was not doing what he said - and remember Bush said before the vote that it did not mean war and the war was 5 months later - Kerry did speak out.

That is also not the only issue, both Kerry 2004 and Edwards only in 2008 were progressive on healthcare and other issues. Kerry has and had the strongest record on the environment in all of the Senate. (I know that Kuchinich is for single payer - and he, you and I know he can't pass it. Kerry's concept to have re-insurance for catastrophic costs could potentially pass and might be a backdoor way to single payer.)

The fact that you rule out Kennedy, Harkin, Brown and others said more of you than of them. They want to accomplish something - doing nothing to stay pure helps no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #72
117. They Are. You Don't Think So Because You Have An Inaccurate And Extremist View On What A
progressive is.

Zealot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
35. Progressives do not vote to illegally invade Third World countries
Clinton did. Clinton also voted to allow Bush to attack Iran as well. She is not "progressive" in any sense. She is a Neocon like John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Is John Edwards a progressive? How about John Kerry?
Both voted like Hillary did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #37
59. I notice they have no answer for you on that
You've exposed them brilliantly. Congrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #59
73. LOL, see above
not so brilliant, you see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #73
82. He/She exposed hypocrisy brilliantly
Should have been more clear and I agree that the only true progressive is probably Russ Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #82
94. Who is saying that John Kerry and John Edwards
are Progressives? Where is this "hypocrisy" you speak of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #94
95. It's much larger than this thread
Hillary has been pilloried on this site 24/7 for her IWR vote - she's been called a republican, a monster really and nobody seems to want to discuss the fact that two practically worshipped senators voted the same exact way - that hypocrisy. I also don't know where you can claim that you, alone, can decide who is and who isn't a progressive. I have my definition and would have no problem with someone disagreeing. You seem to have a very closed mind on this. YOu don't get to decide how to define people - even if I pretty much agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #37
75. No, they're not.
i thought the thread was about Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #35
51. Don't forget-Obama voted to continue to fund the War. His hands have blood on them too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #35
84. Obama has blood on his hands for FUNDING the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #35
105. Obviously They Do. Get Over It.
Progressive does not mean not voting to go to war ever. It also does not mean that you are never allowed to have an error in judgment or make a mistake.

Zealot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
38. I prefer the term liberal
Progressive has no meaning anymore. It is equally claimed by conservatives and those on the left.

In my own view, a true progressive does not believe that corporations should be given free rein, and that markets are not the only things to measure value by.

A true progressive does not sit by and allow -- or condone -- such right-wing behavior as endless mergers into corporate giants, foolish memes like "getting your wages cut is good for you," or "monopolies are necessary to preserve competition" etc.

Forgive me if this sounds narrow-minded or self-righteous but....Being 56 years old, I have seen basic liberal and progressives abandoned and thrown out to the wolves by a brand of Democrat that has forgotten what the values and importance of liberalism and progressive populism really.

And that pisses me off. All I really want is a restoration some some balance between the values of business and the rest of society. Is that too much to ask? It seems that way, listening to some democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
39. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. I'm supporting HRC because she's more progressive than BO
He throws progressives under the bus at every turn. "Chablis-drinking limousine liberals" last week, in the same appearance when he gave Repubs credit for having better ideas on the environment. Can you fucking believe that!? And he's done it over and over again, whether it's complaining that Democrats aren't religious enough or that bickering partisans in the 60s and 90s are a big part of our problems.


___

The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy, now at my new home: Correntewire.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #40
52. Obama wants to let corporations "regulate themselves" in regards to the environment!
I have NO doubt that Obama is more rethuglican than progressive. Hell, he even thinks highly of Reagan! :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
42. Perhaps her "good twin" is progressive, but the bad twin vis a vis, "Campaign Hillary" isn't.
And it's a damn shame.

It was hard not to see where she was going to take her campaign when early on, she welcomed a fundraiser hosted for her by Rupert Murdoch... it was all downhill from there.... and it's a damn shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
43. Progressives don't climb into political bed with Richard Mellon Scaife...
...and use Karl Rove's playbook (and WORSE) to "win" an election against a Democrat. Progressives don't race-bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #43
83. you are jealous. Hillary is not afraid to take on bullies like Scaife and O'Lielly--what does Obama
do?--he gets softball questions by Wallace. now he says he will consider
going on OLielly after the primaries.
yet, Obama CRAWLS to Fox news when he is in trouble with Wright to get his message out.

what a sorry wimp he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #43
89. I agree
But Progressives also don't climb into bed with Donnie McClurkin and Kirbyjon Caldwell and use Karl Rove's playbook to 'win' an election by baiting hooks for bigots with minorities the bigots don't like. Progressives don't gay bait. They don't use religion as a wedge issue. They don't hire the same guy who sang to Bush with teary eyes at GOP Convention 2004 to come out a preach against a loyal Democratic voter base.
There is a pair of non Progressive shoes in this contest, one sized for him and another for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
44. Hillary's vote to make war against a nation that never hurt us was not progressive. It was evil.
One million innocent Iraqi children, men and women are dead because of that invasion.

Nothing was "progressive" about that vote.

Her callous support of her husband's so-called "welfare reform" was reactionary and hurt the poorest and most vulnerable citizens: women and children.

She's a Democrat, but not progressive. She's a corporatist, just like her husband. And there's nothing "progressive" about that.

Your OP was filled with the F word and insults to many of us here at the DU. You should try to learn to use better language to express your sentiments. Experiment with other words. You can do it. I'm pulling for you.

"F this and F that" seems to be the hallmark of your posts of late. Not a cheery sort you are of late. Here's hoping you find your better self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
45. OMC, remember that some are here to split the Party.
Some here are agitators from the left -- the same people who worked to split the party in 2000. DU is definitely under attack by these provocateurs. I think I even see one in this thread. They never will say who they voted for in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Probably Nader
and yes, I see a lot of that too. A lot of hate for the Democratic party in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
47. Sorry, HRC is NO Progressive, and she never was. Neither was her husband.
Progressive is a subset of liberal. All progressives are liberal, not all liberals are progressive.

I don't really consider them very liberal, either. Clinton policies are historically conservative both socially and fiscally. Certainly not rightwing conservative, but conservative all the same.

Don't forget, that as an adult, HRC was a Goldwater Republican and President of the Young Republicans.

I think that kind of conservatism is still in her blood.

And by the way, Progressives don't swagger around threatening to "obliterate" entire countries, vote to invade the powerless ones, equivocate on torture, or give the okay to using cluster bombs against civilian populations.

Sorry, but to claim HRC as a "technical Progressive" is more than laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
53. Take the term than. I don't want it. Since Progressive in Hillaryland means
setting race relations back 20 years in order to get herself ahead.

In 1984 Orwell DoubleSpeak

Progressive = Regressive.


Keep the word, and the party too. I really don't want to be any part of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannigan Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #53
87. Hillary has set race relations back 20 years? HAHAHA - NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #53
92. Since when?
I really don't understand how Hillary has set back race relations.

What I see is a media who has used race relations as a Nielson number. I see a media who has spoonfed us lines about race in this primary.

Is she racist? More than likely the answer is no. Is he sexist? Probably not. Does the media enjoy the ratings that they've received this primary season? That's an enthusiastic yes on their behalf.

I like Senator Clinton, you like Senator Obama. We both like different people and that's ok since, as far as I know, we both have the same goals and dreams for our children. We both want who we think is the best candidate and, if that fails, we'll vote for the better of the two left in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
118. la gatafrancais
needs to stick to humping on her obama blow up doll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redsoxrudy Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
55. Are you kidding?
Since when do "progressives" hold leadership positions in the DLC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
56. Fuck That - I'm a Liberal
And will never run away from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #56
80. Liberals don't vote for the DLC
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
60. Just asking here, who gets to decide what progressive means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
61. If it replaces "leftist," I'll take it.
I can't stand how that's thrown around to mean anything anybody wants it to mean. (I was once told here that it means whatever people FEEL it means. It's all about feelings, ya see.)

Whatever "progressive" is or isn't, Clinton and Obama are pretty much the same, as I see it -- if anything, she's more progressive/liberal/left because of that dreaded "mandate" in her health care proposal, which is actually an important step toward single-payer, "socialist" national health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
62. Thanks for posting this, OMC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
63.  A lot of self-proclaimed gatekeepers. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
64. K and R!
:yourock:

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
65. From Wikipedia
Progressivism historically advocates the advancement of workers' rights and social justice. The progressives were early proponents of anti-trust laws, regulation of large corporations and monopolies, as well as government-funded environmentalism and the creation of National Parks and Wildlife Refuges.


How has Hillary Clinton avocated the advancement of worker's rights and social justice? How has Hillary Clinton worked towards regulation of large corporations and monopolies? What has she done for environmentalism, National Parks, and Wildlife Refuges? Give us facts, not assertions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheZug Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
69. YOU HAVE CONVINCED ME WITH YOUR UNASSAILABLE ARGUMENT:
Your post is a true gem of rhetorical persuasion! Before I had held up MLK's "Letter From Birmingham Jail" as an exemplar, but now that essay, however powerful, must fall behind yours.

"Here's a fucking fact for ya," "Yes, she is," "you don't know what the fuck you're talking about," "deal with it"--I have been turning over and over these intricately constructed arguments in my mind, and they are rock solid. To spend such time defining your times and providing evidence for your assertions--astonishing! The finest rhetoricians, from Socrates onward, could only resort to weeping and begging for mercy in the face of your mighty expostulations. And such persuasive language as well! So subtle, and yet so convincing!

My hat is off to you! Grant us another lesson, oh Master, so that we may learn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #69
76. "You're a zealot if you don't agree with me!"
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #69
86. thank you for saving me from actually reading the whole thing
kinda like cliff notes for those who wish to keep their sanity...you're a braver person than i...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #69
109. Oh Don't Worry, I Didn't Set Out To Convince You.
See, if zealots were so easily able to be swayed from their extremism, they wouldn't be zealots. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #69
123. POST THIS AS A THREAD
Title it: "Retort to another OPERATIONMINDCRIME troll thread".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
70. Hillary is Republican Lite on trade and foreign policy issues.
This is obvious to anyone following politics. But, sure, she trends progressive on other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
74. Who Cares!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #74
79. Well, by posting in the thread we can all see you care
even if you only care about trashing it - you've still shown you care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
77. Go Play with your Hillary Action Figure Dolls !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. He can't. Obama took them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #78
96. Lmao...nt
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
81. Ok fine. Hillary = Progressive. We really mean Hillary = BAD PERSON
When people say "she isn't progressive" what they are trying to say, in a nicer way, is: She is an awful human being. Not necessarily because of policy, but because of character and tactics.

Her tactics in this campaign have been horrendous. They are gutter politics taken right from Rove's playbook. She has slandered, distorted, twisted, and spun her way to where she is now. She panders openly. She will say and do anything, at any cost, to get elected. She lies openly. She admits to lying openly. In the debate she said that she said things "she knew not to be the truth" and was embarrassed - probably more that she got caught than ashamed that she lied.

She signed a pledge in September 2007 saying that she would not campaign in MI and FL. Made statements to the press acknowledging how they would not count. Then, only after it is shown to be to her advantage, she is throwing a fit to get them seated AS IS, despite the fact that Obama's name was not on the Michigan ballot. He removed it at the party's request. It's not fair. And EVERYONE knows it.

She has built up the Republican nominee in the same breath that she tears down the Democratic frontrunner. Her surrogates have SLANDERED anyone who's allegiance has moved from Hillary to Obama. Evan Bayh has been intimidating Superdelegates and those running for office. He tells them to stay out of it and not get "cross ways" with any of the candidates - even though he openly supports Hillary.

She and the campaign have ridiculed her opponents supporters, democratic activists, and VOTERS in general - the same people you are TRYING to woo to your campaign. VOTERS have been called Prius driving, Birkenstock wearing, brainwashed, kool-aid drinking, naive, immature, latte drinking, elitist, SHEEPLE. Is this the best strategy you could come up with? INSULT the people you are trying to get to VOTE for you?

She has and continues to use her campaign and surrogates to threaten the party and party leaders. They've threatened to withhold funding for the DCCC - a brilliant strategy considering you are essentially threatening to withhold funding for Superdelegates. Her thugs have threatened Dean. There has been talk of "blood on the convention floor". Her campaign won't deny that she is considering the "nuclear" option. All behavior that actively demonstrates that she has her own ambitions ahead of the good of the party and the nation.

And then there's the robocalls to black voters in North Carolina giving them the incorrect polling information. Her campaign manager is on their board. The staff donates heavily to Clinton. These calls were also placed in previous primaries, like in Virginia, they were told to stop and the campaign was made aware. The calls continued.

And then there's the PANDERING. Voting for the Iraq war authorization: PANDERING. Saying she did not regret her vote as late as 2004: PANDERING. Gas tax holiday that 200 economists think is a STUPID idea: PANDERING. Saying she would "obliterate" Iran: Jesus Christ, I HOPE it's pandering.

No. I suppose no one owns the term "progressive". But you are missing the larger point. People are morally OUTRAGED at her behavior. MANY people who consider themselves "progressive" do not want to be associated with her any further and have criticised her and her tactics. LOTS of people. Not just party officials. Not just Dean and Pelosi. Not just KO, Stewart, Colbert, and all the other "news" guys we ALL used to regard as progressive. Not just superdelegates. Not just former friends and collegues of the Clintons. Not just black voters. Not just the international community (with her threats to Iran). But MANY people from all across the spectrum... MANY people whose vote she is, in theory, attempting to earn.

Hillary and her supporters' obvious DENIAL about how MANY MANY MANY people feel about her negativity is IGNORANT, STUPID, and ultimately to your detriment and your detriment alone. Instead of hearing negative feedback and switching your strategy, you just turned the volume up! Your inability to accept criticisms from across the political and public spectrums is self-defeating and arrogant. It's your M.O. and it's going to come back and bite you in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
88. can we define progressive and democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
91. You've made your point

The term is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
97. If your representative is a DLC member, or a Blue Dog or a "New Democrat"...
they are PROBABLY NOT a Progressive.

Best indicators....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
99. Hillary has a very Progressive Senate Voting Record.
With the notable exception of the IWR.
So, if her voting record is the sole measure of candidacy, and the rest of her statements & rhetoric & tactics are ignored, then you have a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #99
110. That's Right, She Does.
Thank you for seeing the forest for the trees. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
101. Some people also think they own the Democratic Party.
Because I support Hillary, I have been told to get the F out of the Democratic Party or that I am a Republican. Sad that supporting one Democrat over another gives some people the idea that they can dismiss others. Thanks for your post, and I hope you don't get too many insults!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #101
104. same here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
102. Oh Thank God Another Blowhard Rant From The Smartest Guy In The Universe To Tell Us How It Really Is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #102
114. Well Someone's Got To Do It From Time To Time.
Not my fault that I have the ability to view things accurately as opposed to some of the knee jerk dumbass completely warped and inaccurate positions some hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
107. clearly you don't know what a progressive is. Neither Hillary or Obama
is one. But you're right about people throwing the term around in silly ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
111. Yeah, the DLC is progressive alright. They want to change directions FOR SURE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
112. Honestly, "Progressive" used to actually have a specific definition
But these days.. it means basically whatever anyone wants it to mean.

I'd like to know how you define progressive and how that relates to Hillary Clinton.

(For the record, but my understanding of progressive, Obama isn't a progressive either)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
113. How do you figure Hillary is a progressive?
What progressive legislation has she sponsored?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
116. It's okay OMC
Just sit back and watch the heads explode when they find out Obama is not "the one" they thought he was.

The higher the pedestal the harder the fall.

Much like after the 2004 or 2006 election I fully expect that one of 2 things will happen.

A) He will lose to the RW machine that makes Clinton look like a kitten and many will go on drinking binges. (I know I did after the Kerry concession speech)

B) He will win, get into the White House and folks will find he isn't going to do all the amazing and wonderful things they were convinced he would do and they will turn on him like rabid dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
120. Very good
I cannot argue with a single point in your post. Very insightful..therefore got your flame proof suit out?;-)
K+R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
121. Hillary is a Republican
Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #121
126. Oh yes
Edited on Tue May-06-08 07:09 PM by turtlensue
HRC is pro-life anti-stem cell global warming denying religous fundamentalist freeper evolution denyier who thinks prayer in school is a good idea.:sarcasm:
You pretty much embody what OMC is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
124. If a progressive is a war lovin, NAFTA lovin, corporate lobby lovin, elitist multi-millionaire
Then she's a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaDooRonRon Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #124
132. Just a quick question here
What makes you think the alternative (Obama) is? Is it because he gives great speech? Surely it can't be the number of corporate advisers he has on his staff, or the number of lobbyists who (back-door) fund his campaign, or the fact that Obama is #3 on the list re: Exxon/Mobil's political candidate contribution list?

I find it amusing that one side thinks that their shit doesn't stink as they sit in a pile of manure with a clothespin over their nose.

disclaimer: I support neither candidate in this race, as I find them both to be fake leftists to the highest degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
127. a progressive is someone afraid of calling themselves a liberal
because they buy into right wing bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaDooRonRon Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
128. Oh please
Edited on Tue May-06-08 07:14 PM by DaDooRonRon
98% of folks on this website wouldn't know a true progressive viewpoint if it bit them in the ass. If they did, they would run not walk away from conventional bought and paid for politicians and realize that snake oil doesn't cure anything.

Oh, and judging by this absurd comment -

"Here's a fucking fact for ya: Hillary Clinton is technically a Progressive. Yes, she is. If you don't think she is, if you put your nose in the air and claim "Hillary is NOT a progressive! Not by a longshot! How can you say that!" then you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Hillary is a progressive. Deal with it. Educate yourself on what being a progressive actually is. K? Thanks."

you don't either.

Thanks for the (I'm sure) unintentional chuckle.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
129. Your candidate has betrayed you AND the party. You sound bitter.. sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
130. D. L. C.
not progressive.

Sorry, but that's the facts. DLC never has been and never will be the progressive wing in the party, by the way they defined themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DawgHouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
131. True, OMC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC