Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"double standard" - GOP breaks tradition on Judicial nominees & crys foul

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 09:59 AM
Original message
"double standard" - GOP breaks tradition on Judicial nominees & crys foul
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6017-2004Jul22.html

Senate Democrats Block 3 More Bush Judicial Nominees

By Helen Dewar
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 23, 2004; Page A05


Senate Democrats blocked three more Bush nominees for federal appeals courts yesterday as Republicans and Democrats accused each other of trampling Senate rules, tradition and comity to advance their political agendas.

For months, Republicans have accused Democrats of breaking with Senate tradition in pursuing a filibuster strategy to kill judicial nominations that have the support of a majority of senators but lack the 60 votes needed to break filibusters. <snip>

Democrats returned fire by charging that Republicans broke with tradition in brushing aside the objections of the nominees' home-state senators, Democrats Carl M. Levin and Debbie Stabenow.

In what amounts to a "double standard," Republicans heeded such home-state objections from Republicans during the Clinton administration but now pay no attention when Democrats object to Bush nominees from their states, said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (Vt.), the ranking Democrat on the judiciary panel. "Rule after rule has been broken or twisted until the process so long agreed upon is hardly recognizable anymore," he said.

Levin and Stabenow complained that Republicans refused to act on President Bill Clinton's nominees for the same court and that Bush rejected suggestions for a bipartisan commission to make recommendation on Michigan nominees -- a practice used by several other large states. <snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Orin Hatch
invoked the practices of the dems during the Clinton administration as their reason for doing this!!!!!!!Un F#ckin beliveable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC