Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else think the rethugs will just try to run out the clock?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nitetalker Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:11 PM
Original message
Anyone else think the rethugs will just try to run out the clock?
Like many DUers I don't foresee the rethugs allowing an orderly tranfer of power.

Anyone else think the rethugs will try to run out the clock and force the prez election to the House of Reps?

This is the scenario I'm envisioning:


  1. The election is held on schedule and Kerry appears to win.

  2. The next day the rethugs contest as many Blue states as they need to keep Kerry's certified electoral vote count under 270 and furthermore less than *'s number.

  3. With enough recounts, court challenges, and other stalling tactics, so much time passes that the election is thrown to the House.

  4. The rethug majority in the House elects *.

  5. Kerry doesn't contest the outcome "to avoid a constitutional crisis".



Another long, drawn-out media orgy with the same gut-wrenching outcome as 2000.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Theoretically possible, I suppose, but not likely
There would be a huge outcry about that one, and uneasy would lie the head that wore the crown. The recounts would still go on, and as long as they were done by 1/20, Bush would still be out on his bum.

In fact, if the little weasel tries and succeeds at something like this, he will still be out on his bum. He's lost the military, the FBI, the CIA, and much of his own party. There is no way he can hang on for another 4 years. Expect an impeachment or intervention by the military if he tries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, even if Dems are ineffective
Bush messed with factions within his party, the pentagon and the intelligence community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing that anyone can think up here is out of the question for me.
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 03:17 PM by Mountainman
I have always thought that if PNACers and conservative ideologues get in power they surely won't want to give it up after having it only for 4 years.

I believe the right is capable of anything we could dream up here.

It really worries me at times. I just don't feel we will have a fair election again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. It won't be as overt as that,
but there are many ways along those lines that could be used to keep Bush in power.

One would be for a couple of states which have Republican controlled legislatures (Florida comes to mind) but where the popular vote goes to Kerry, however the legislatures certify the Republican slate of electors.

Keep in mind, we not only don't directly elect the president, but we're actually two removes from the process: we vote for a slate of electors in November, but each state's legislature certifies that slate. Remember, the Florida lawmakers were making it crystal clear in early December that they quite frankly did not care how any recount came out, nor how a Supreme Court decision went, they were going to certify the Republican electors, plain and simple.

It is true that since there is currently a Republican majority in both houses, any election thrown to Congress will not result in Kerry becoming president. Unless something happens as did in the summer of 1974 when Republicans began going to Dick Nixon and telling him the time had come to resign. In today's far more polarized climate, I don't really see that happening.

Another way to keep Bush in the White House is if polling during the last few weeks is all over the place, one poll showing Kerry ahead, another showing Bush, yet another showing it too close to call. And what if those polls indicate it's hard to tell which voters will actually turn out. So we'd then go into election day with enormous uncertainty, which would make many people far more willing to put up with anomalous results.

Or how about a couple of relatively minor, but otherwise strategic power surges in certain precincts. The vote was expected to be close, but now the electronic machines show a small majority in Bush's favor. Again, a relatively small number of those in the right places, and Bush "wins".

There are several others even I can think of, and probably more effective ones I'm not. Just don't look for anything obvious. I got VERY worried once the trial balloon was floated about delaying or cancelling the election. That didn't fly, so you really, really don't need to worry about that one. But what you do need to worry about is the scenario that none of us are thinking of right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've wondered about this myself.
It is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. If there is a trick, and they think they can get away with it. They will
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 03:57 PM by w4rma
likely do it, imho. They *will* do *anything* to keep the power they have taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. The election is not sent to the House if state outcomes are pending.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes-
And you can't challenge a vote unless you are less than .05% behind in most states...



Sometimes I think folks on this site live in a parallel universe....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. A parallel paranoid universe
(how can I say this without getting my post deleted- but it should be said}

Where some have nothing better to do but worry worry worry, and where they fall victim to the same ideology as they see in their enemies.

Mirror image thinking essentially.


 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC