Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Networks calling a state for a candidate.. a question:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 10:52 PM
Original message
Networks calling a state for a candidate.. a question:
Will the networks hold-off on calling a state until all polls in that state are closed, or will they wait until all polling places in all lower 48 states are closed?

It could make a difference if the race is close. For example, if two of Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are all called for Kerry after their polls close, how would this affect turnout in western states? Would Democrats sit at home and figure that it's a done deal, or would they be energized for a final push at the polls?

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hello again
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 11:08 PM by Redneck Socialist
I don't think it will be that big a deal. It may suppress turnout (on both sides?) some, but if we win the three you mentioned we can afford to loose some of the western swing states. Even if say WA, OR and NM all go for bush (I don't think they will) we will still take CA and Kerry wins going away.

Please refresh my memory. Haven't the networks agreed not to announce results until the polls close in the west in the past? I seem to remember that but I'm not 100% sure.

on edit: Questions should have question marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. No way the networks will pass up calling FL OH and PA
as soon they can.

It just ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salonghorn70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. It Is My Understanding
That networks have agreed not to call an individual state where parts of the state are still voting due to different time zones. An example would be Florida where most of the state is in the Eastern time zone but part is in Central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. view from the West Coast
business as usual: all the focus is on the east and midwest, we're an afterthought.

It has gotten a bit better, though. in 1980 the networks called the entire election for Reagan at about 6 PST (IIRC correctly - I had just gotten home from work), well before the polls closed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I believe an agreement with the FEC requires networks to hold off
on any "call" until 8:00 PM PDT. Early news will be available from various blogs that are not beholden to this agreement, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. This has been a "controversial" subject since the 1980 election
...when Jimmy Carter conceded the election at 7:00 PM Pacific Time, an hour before the polls closed, after the networks had already called it for Reagan. It's no secret that the West Coast states - and Hawaii, which is even 2 hours earlier - go Democratic far more often than Republican, and that another hour of voting might have made the difference.

Even though I was 14 and couldn't vote, I was outraged at the media for calling it, and at Carter for accepting it as early as he did.

As we all know from the Florida debacle, 20 years later, very little has changed in how the mediawhores handle elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC