Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Obama is more electable than Hillary: HE WON.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:08 AM
Original message
Why Obama is more electable than Hillary: HE WON.
So now can we come together and starting working toward Obama's victory in November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dean was far more electable than Kerry, but...who won the Primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Using what metric?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. All available metrics. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What?
Huh?

If you want to go to the most basic tool, Clinton has a better outcome vs McCain than Obama in 5/6 polls.

It has been that way for about 2 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The poll I took with my cats show 2 in the bedroom,
three in the front room....

That means Obama wins by 3/5ths of a pride of kitties or one full cat.


Signed Sealed Delivered.

This poll is as relevant as any bullshit GE poll you can come up with.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cieran Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Screw elections, lets let private polling companies pick the President! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Polls on the GE are bullshit. We're still 6 months away..
Omama will crush McSame!

Bookmark this! :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. If she can't beat a first-term Senator who is black, and whose name is Barack Hussein Obama...
She's not more electable. It's still mind-boggling to think that she lost the nomination - with her universal name recognition, a popular former Democratic president for a husband, tons of support from the establishment, tons of early endorsements, and yet... a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama, who's been in the Senate for just a few years, has beaten her! It must be very embarrassing for her, now that I think about it. She must feel offended that she didn't get the nomination - it's her turn, dammit!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Bill Clinton was in 3rd place in the polls in June of 1992
Behind Ross Perot and the first President Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeDJohn Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. And without Ross Perot, Bill NEVER would have been Prez eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Without any possible evidence, how can we know that is true? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think it is self-evident.
Hence the media's quest to destroy him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The media's quest to destroy Obama since he meant real business has been obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Yeah, sure.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. no that's probably wishful thinking
He may have been as electable as Kerry, but far more? Kerry barely lost, well he actually won, but he barely lost. In no way could Dean have blown out Bush, which would have made him "far more electable." But Dean, in the electoral college, brought less to the table than Kerry. He would have been routed in the South, and probably would have lost Ohio outright and his anti-war stance plus the fear tactics of Bush would have hurt him even more than Kerry. Dean wouldn't have been swiftboated by the swiftboaters, but he was gaffe prone enough that something would have caught up with him. He probably would have been more aggressive than Kerry, but who knows if that would have worked for him in the end. Probably not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Bingo.
The noise level and the obnoxiousness of this campaign will come back to haunt you in the end. Bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. That is very flawed logic
It's a whole other game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rubiconski2009 Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary got her butt kicked....Fair and square
Obama has already begun pulling the country together, getting people to register who have been left out for decades.

The GOP has lost a generation of young voters and they will pay dearly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. She's won under 15 contests. That's UNELECTABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. no, honey, you see, the GE and a democratic primary are two totally different contests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. Um, not yet. It's a squeaker at best, you have plenty of opposition in your own party,
and a lot of people don't like your guy. Your side was gloating months ago. Of course you're indulging in arrogant fantasies. That's pretty much what you do.

Good luck living in the real world once this is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. More importantly,
Obama is more electable than McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. It pains me to say anything resembling support of Hillary's campaign, but this is flawed logic
Edited on Mon May-12-08 07:07 AM by Ian_rd
Just because he has proved more electable in the primary does not mean he is more electable in the General. Democratic Primary voters are a different data set than general election voters. For example, just because Dennis Kucinich is electable in his district does not mean (obviously) that he is just as electable in a nation-wide contest.

I consider it possible that Hillary would be more electable in the general for two reasons:
1. She's not black, and there are probably a couple million assholes in this nation who would sooner vote themselves bankrupt and homeless before they voted for a black guy.
2. She doesn't have a scary name. Well, not as scary as "Hussein" and "Obama" that is.

On the other hand, she is handicapped in the general by more factors, some very significant:
1. She's a woman, and there are probably a million or more assholes who just just could not bring themselves to vote for a woman no matter what.
2. Due to the right-wing and mainstream media for the past sixteen years, she has always had a low ceiling of support due to the knee-jerk Clinton hatred she inspires, not only among Republicans but also many Independents.
3. A substantial number of the new participants in the Democratic primaries would be less likely to participate in the General if she won. Obama is the one who has really brought the new meat into active participation, and a Hillary nomination - especially now that it would resemble (if not actually be) an electoral robbery - would leave swathes of Democratic voters without the will to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. In just four months, setting the tone will be paramount
I consider the possibility that there are enough high-profile people in music and television as well as others in the mass media who will kind of act in concert to set the tone.

Events such as free concerts and appearances at rallies could help keep the media focused on the positive energy that is integral to the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. somewhat convincing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. another clueless naive Obamite who thinks the GE is the same as a dem primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC