Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's too much mistaken optimism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:43 PM
Original message
There's too much mistaken optimism
According to the 2004 census, there were:

http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p20-556.pdf

126 million voters
100 million white
14 million black
8 million Hispanic

12 million 18-24 years old
18 million 25-34
25 million 35-44
26 million 45-54
44 million 55+

http://harrisdealerpoll.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=727

In 2006:

37% surveyed called themselves conservative
37% called themselves moderate
19% called themselves liberal

Obama can certainly beat McCain, but given the demographics of this country it's not likely that he will make major inroads in traditionally Republican states. I've seen threads where some have said that Obama can win states like Georgia and Kansas. I say no way he'll win those states. It will be hard enough for him to win Democratic states like Florida, where the elderly identify with McCain, and West Virginia, where Obama seems unusually unpopular. While he has strong support among blacks and young people, he is going to have to make serious inroads into other demographic groups.

I'm not knocking Obama, who I think is our strongest candidate, but I think we have to be realistic and recognize that Obama needs every advantage he can get, and that includes a strong endorsement from Hillary Clinton, from blue dog Democrats, and others who we may not like. It is going to be a tough election to win. Clinton's attacks on Obama will seem like childplay once the Republicans get going, and the Democratic Party is going to have to be unusually united in order to handle the onslaught of lies and distortions that the Republicans will hit Obama with.

I think many of us will agree that Obama is in the tradition of Gore and Kerry, a sort of liberal moderate who is highly educated, and well spoken. But, neither Gore nor Kerry won. Obama has a few advantages they don't -- the Republicans have made an a historic mess of things; Obama has put together an amazing grassroots campaign; and Obama is perhaps the greatest living orator. But, if we start with pipe dreams about him winning Kansas and Georgia, and refuse to compromise with more conservative parts of the Democratic Party, then I don't think the Democrats can beat McCain.

Looking at the above statistics, I think you can say that Obama has a lock on blacks (who represent about 10% of voters) and young people (who represent about 10% of voters). In addition, if we assume that half of liberals are black or young, then the remaining liberals (non- black and older) must represent about 10% of voters. That means Obama will do very well among 30% of the electorate. Given that, I think he'll have hard enough time putting together a winning electoral strategy, let alone going after states that simply do not vote for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have not yet lost my respect for Hillary Clinton...
...but I will if she doesn't do her damnedest to reunite the party once this is all over. The onus will be on the loser, no matter what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. The media will be bending over backwards to portray
McCain in the most favorable way possible. He'll be touted as "independent-minded," "a maverick," and "a war hero." None of his numerous verbal gaffes will get any publicity. Criticism of him will be practically non-existent except on Olbermann.

Obama, meantime, will be under a microscope with numerous repuke operatives taking continuous verbal shots at him. The repukes won't run an overtly racist campaign, but there will be plenty of racist overtones. It will get ugly.

Given those demographics and based on voting patterns in the last two elections, I'm not overly optimistic about November. And I certainly hope I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hey Eeeyore. How's it going? You are always wrong. Get used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did you predict Clinton wouldn't get the nomination 6 months ago? I'm just trying to get a
handle on how good your are at this predicting stuff.

By the way, Gore won. You might want to work on your hindsight 20/20 vision stuff before you try to tackle the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I supported Obama early on ...
... I supported Obama and thought he would win because he was a good candidate with a great campaign, and elections are about the campaign more than the candidate. (Otherwise, how the hell could an idiot like Bush get elected.) Gore lost. He should have won handily enough to make Republican corruption irrelevant. He should have at least won his home state of Tennessee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Gore won. He won Florida by thousands of votes. Votes that were caged. He also won the popular vote.
The only way an idiot like bush could obtain office is by stealing the office.

He didn't convince a majority of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Any historical reference to site? Carter didn't have a majority of cons either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Carter lost to Reagan, though
I was a paid coordinator on the Carter campaign against Reagan. The reason Carter lost to Reagan was that the left rejected him when Carter moved towards the center. Many left wingers, so confident that no one in their right mind would support Reagan, voted for John Anderson or did not vote. As a left winger myself, I found this so frustrating because I knew the race would be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Carter lost
because of the "hostage crisis," which was not resolved in time thanks to Republican backdoor deals with Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The Kennedy-wing did not unite behind Carter
The northern establishment Dems had never liked Carter and did not unite strongly in his support. At the same time, the Helms/Reagan Repubs were running their attacks on the excesses of the 1960's.

Seems like old times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The statistics don't support your theory
that Carter's move to the center caused the loss of the 1980 election.

26% of Democrats voted for Reagan, 6% for Anderson. If every single person who voted for Anderson (Republican, Democrat and Independent) had voted for Carter, Carter would have still lost.

Hence the term, "Reagan Democrats".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. When Gore and Kerry ran, an (R) on one's ass didn't carry the same stigma it does today.
And, McCain's got a big one plastered on his crazy butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC