Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't forget, after the first round of voting at the convention, all delegates are freed up!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:55 PM
Original message
Don't forget, after the first round of voting at the convention, all delegates are freed up!
If neither Obama or Clinton win the magic number of delegates in the first ballot, all delegates are freed from any obligations to represent either candidate.

Also the delegate population reflects each state's ethnic distribution; and at least 50% of the delegates must be women.

Hillary has no reason to stop before the convention, and now that the delegates see how Obama treats states like W. VA, (barely even showed up, left the state without a

word- no concession speech, no speech reaching out to the voters there) many will be looking to the person who does not give up on the American people,

Hillary Clinton.

The contrast that the delegates will see at the convention will be stark, Obama and his above it all aloofness vs Hillary's unflappable dedication to give voice to the

forgotten people of this country. I for one, can't wait.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's great. B/C a lot of Hillary's pledged delegates want to support Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Touche'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFN1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
55. And let's not forget
what a 'quitter' Obama is. Why, he's quit just about everything he's ever tried!! He's not a fighter, no not him. So since Hillary is obviously the ONLY fighter in American politics today, she is the logical choice. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
68. Talk about having buyer's remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gore/Edwards 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. There won't be anything other than a first round. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's rich to hear outrage that Obama neglected a state from a supporter of Sen. Big-states-only n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. She has campaigned her ass off in all the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Uh huh. Right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. bwhahahaha. Sure she has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. You must have forgotten those 14 in a row after Super Tuesday that she forgot about.
You know, the ones she didn't bother with, because "this will be settled Feb 5," remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. First round=Obama. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary says they're all free now. So switch to a winner, switch to OBAMA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's utterly ridiculous to think this will go until the convention. It won't.
SDs will put Obama over the top before the first day of summer. Hill doesn't have the resources to continue another month, let alone until the end of August. The SDs have no use for hillary. They've made that clear in the wave of endorsements that they've sent to Obama. They aren't going to change their minds.

Everyone knows it's over but dedicated Hillfans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's funny. The majority of Obamafans were yelling last month that it was all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. That would be because, basically...
It was over. We have faith that the process will run a fair and reasonable course. The only way it won't is through lies, manipulation and coercion. In short, we have faith in Democrats to do the right thing and in our party to uphold the rules, which means Obama is our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Lies, manipulation, and coercion? How about the rules that already are in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. You mean the rules Obama has followed to the letter in GOOD FAITH?
Edited on Wed May-14-08 03:02 PM by Labors of Hercules
The ones that the state parties in Fl and Mi broke and now Hillary is trying to change?
You mean those rules?

The ones that Hillary and Terry constantly throw smoke and mirrors in front of so people are duped into believing they are different from what they are?
You mean THOSE rules?

The rules governing the Democratic primary election of the nominee for President of the United States. Those are the rules you are talking about, right?

The rules that Hillary's campaign has been shitting on since she realized Obama was going to win if they continued to be followed. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. MI and FL will be seated, no one disagrees with that. The only thing left to work out is
the apportionment of the delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
71. Hillary rejected the MI deal
So the the best she'll get is 50/50 - and still not enough either. RBC will be ruling the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. It was then, and still is, now.
His lead has only gotten bigger since a month ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. That's because it's essentially been over since Wisconsin.
She's done. For goodness sake, it's time to accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
43. It was over last month
Your failure to come to terms with that does not make it false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. If it's over, why are you posting in the primaries forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
60. Hate to do this AGAIN but this is is the POLITICS forum
has been for ever

I know you're new

The renaming means nothing to OLD DU'uers who have been round these parts a tad longer than you have

The transition back from silly season to POLITICS will happen soon. Maybe then it will finally sink for you

By the way if this goes to Denver, given HISTORY... it will be a mistake.

Oh never mind math and history is not your strong point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Right now it's the primaries forum, it will switch to the politics forum when the primaries are over
You are certainly stubborn in the face of plain facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
73. because some people need to be told over and over that its over
Get thee to the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. It was. Hillary put you through all this for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting that half the delegates must be women
It'll really sting for her to get her ass handed to her in person from people she thought were her base. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Some of those women are required right now to vote for Obama against their will,
after the initial vote they will be free to vote for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. i think i get it now.... you're doing a bit right? this is satire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. HOLD ON A MINUTE...Against their will?
I don't think so. People run for delegate positions based on presidential preference. And candidates have the right to refuse delegates who aren't committed to the, from the states.

Where do you see delegates being forced against their will to vote for either candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. Many of those delegates expressed support before the Rev Wright stuff came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. The only people who really care about Wright are Hillary's rabid supporters and repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Those poor women... held hostage to the big scary black man
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Those poor women... held hostage to the big scary black man
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. In most states they are already free to change their vote
There is nothing magical about the second ballot that means pledged delegates can change, thats simply a common practice. Once a state's right of review period has passed the campaigns have no recourse for pledged delegates that change their minds. But all this ignores the fact that the pledged delegates are hand selected by the campaigns. Unless the Obama campaign or Clinton campaign did a really bad job vetting the pledged delegates we are going to see very few switchers, even after multiple ballots. Only "kool-aid drinkers" to put it DU lexicon were allowed to stand as pledged delegates. Basically, pledged delegates do not vote a certain way because they are forced to by their pledge, they vote a certain way because the campaigns make sure only ultra loyal "to the end of the Earth" supporters are allowed to be their pledged delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. It won't take many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. What's your definition of "many"
Obama has 1600 pledged delegates and 285 superdelegates as of now. He is most likely going to win at least 90 pledged delegates in the remaining contests. That leaves him 50 delegates shy of 2025. Maybe the endorsements will trail off at some point, but it has not shown any signs of doing so yet. Of the remaining 240 or so superdelegates it is quite likely that Obama will take at least 2/3 or them, 160 or so, in the next 6-7 weeks. I could see maybe 10-20 switchers, but nowhere near the 100+ needed to put Obama under 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. 2209.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
53. do you have any idea how pledged delegates are selected?
They aren't random people. They are dedicated supporters of the person to whom they are pledged. It is no more likely that they will switch than it is that electoral college supporters will switch in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Many of Obama's supporters pledged before Wright made his entrance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #58
77. Obama's pledged delegates are even more rabid supporters than his supporters at DU
just like Clinton's supporters are.

They ain't switching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
61. Against their will? No one is foricng them to be delegates.
But why should we be surprised that Hillary supporters want to play their own game just as she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. They are already uniting around
the winner. Why would they switch to Hillary at the convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Not the super's, the pledged delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Ok. So we've gone to "pledged delegates are important!" to "the supers will save us!" to pledged
delegates again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. The ones that represent the will of the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
62. Forgive me but WHO is leading right now in the SD count?
If you bother to look this up, you will find it is NOT HRC... she was, a week ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ugh, that's a nightmare
I really hope it doesn't come to that. There's some weird 2008/1968 parallels here that could lead to another chaotic convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymakeragain Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's really shameless, your sense of entitlement.
She's not entitled to the nomination. Obama earned it the hard way, let him get some rest for November for fuck's sake, she can't win and won't have the backing to steal it.

Time for the Clinton's to bow out stage right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. huffing glue is bad, hmmmkay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. David Axelrod in High School.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. ...
Edited on Wed May-14-08 02:19 PM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hillary's last, most laughable argument for viability yet:
"All the delegates could totally ignore the primaries, caucuses, and their prior declarations, and vote for Hillary!"

Well, yeah. By that logic, Ron Paul is still a viable contender for the Republican nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Isn't Paul plotting a revolt at the GOP convention?
That ought to be fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. There's only going to be one round. The split would have to be less than ........
19 delegates apart to require a second vote, and that will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
54. what's the significance of 19?
Is that how many pledged delegates Edwards has?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #54
69. Yep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
59. Somebody has to hit 2209 for it to end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. 2025 is the number set by rules and bylaws. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. Only if the millions of voices in FL and MI are squashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #59
75. Once again, that's if FL and MI are seated
Which currently they aren't - the magic number remains 2025.

If they are both seated (which I'm pretty sure they will), it'll be 2209 after MAY 31st, not before. And Obama still secures the nomination regardless of FL/MI.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
39. And one never knows what can happen between now in May and then in August ..... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's not going to the convention if it does go that far then neither would win the election
the party would be too broken and Obama nor Hillary would win. That would be Hillary's legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
64. That's another example of the Obma supporters threatening Hillary that she better get out, or else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #64
76. the entire premise of your post is based on a threat by HRC supporters v. Obama
Your entire premise is that voters who would support HRC will abandon the Democratic party and stay home or vote for McCain, costing Obama the election.

Or am I missing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. With only two on the ballot. It will be over in one round.
It would have to be within Edwards' 19 difference to cause a second round.

It ain't gonna happen. Keep dreaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. You have read the wrong rulebook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. It would require that or for delegates to sit out.
Which I don't see happening.

One vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
51. You guys are nuts
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
56. Just because you can come up with a way for your candidate to win...
Doesn't mean it's in anyone's best interest for her to pursue that course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. It may not be in your or Obama's best interest, but it would be in the country's best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
65. shit... looks like you found the final resting place for the goalposts--
total party destruction. That is the only result of a floor fight at the convention. IF you want to see thousands of more americans die in Iraq (the draft will only become a more realistic possibility), then go ahead and take it to the floor. No Democratic Candidate has won a modern election when the party went to the convention non-unified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. If this goes all the way to the convention be prepared to say hello President McCain (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
72. You can't really actually think...
...that it's going past round one. There's no chance, you realize that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbrenna Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
78. Do you really think
it would be possible to win the general election after a political stunt like that? Please try to remember this is a primary race between two Democrats who have similar policies...lets not give McCain the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
79. any SD not committed by 6-10-08 should be drawn and quartered
this will BE OVER

OVER by then...

unless the SD's don't mind losing in November... then I'd have to question their loyalties...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
80. You're right. The SDs flooded to Clinton today....
oh... wait.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
81. I thought it was 4th vote
and he'll have eough to win on the first ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC