Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama doesn't have a "white working class" problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:14 AM
Original message
Obama doesn't have a "white working class" problem
He has an Appalachian problem, according to Josh Marshall:

"There's been a lot of talk in this campaign about Barack Obama's problem with working class white voters or rural voters. But these claims are both inaccurate because they are incomplete. You can look at states like Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and other states and see the different numbers and they are all explained by one basic fact. Obama's problem isn't with white working class voters or rural voters. It's Appalachia. That explains why Obama had a difficult time in Ohio and Pennsylvania and why he's getting crushed in West Virginia and Kentucky.

If it were just a matter of rural voters or the white working class, the pattern would show up in other regions. But by and large it does not.

In so many words, Pennsylvania and Ohio have big chunks of Appalachia within their borders. But those regions are heavily offset by non-Appalachian sections that are cultural and demographically distinct. West Virginia is 100% Appalachian. If you look at southeastern Ohio or the middle chunk of Pennsylvania, Obama did about the same as he's doing tonight in West Virginia."

"During the 18th and 19th centuries, in the middle Atlantic and particularly in the Southern states, there was a long-standing cleavage between the coastal and 'piedmont' regions on the one hand and the upcountry areas to the west on the other. It's really the coastal lowlands and the Appalachian districts. On the other side of the Appalachian mountain range the pattern is flipped, with the Appalachians in the east and the lowlands in the west."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/194870.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. great article thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am with you on this. Look at Maine and Vt. Could any states be
more white? Look at all the Western states. It seem to be that line down that range of Mt. I think that is the same place that is still into Queen Elizabeth music also. That is number one not the Queen now. OK I am kidding on that last part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. my husband made this very observation yesterday. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. diary on kos talking about this, goes into more depth:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. That is why Jim Webb makes much more sense as VP than Hillary Clinton.
Uniting the needs of disadvantaged whites and blacks would be powerful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In other words:
Hillbillies for Hillary.

:spank: :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, that map says it all.
Counties where Clinton won at least 65% of the vote in purple:
(WV & KY, in grey, not counted yet)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've been saying that for a while. I meant to link the article from yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC