Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's game-changing Kerry connection, now comes Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:45 AM
Original message
Obama's game-changing Kerry connection, now comes Edwards

Process vs Policy: Fundraising

by Shaun Appleby, Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 04:51:03 PM EST

A candidate supporter diary for MyDD

Fundraising is an essential, and early, component of any successful campaign. In Senator Obama's case, an unexpected and relatively late decision to run against an established and well resourced opponent, it formed a vital part of his campaign strategy. From the beginning, he was confidently able to tap a large pool of institutional donors in his native Illinois, but his first major coup was to acquire not only key staff but the bulk of the existing, and substantial, donor base of Senator John Kerry, who declined to run:

Kerry's loss has primarily been Obama's gain. The newcomer has secured commitments from 27 of the 41 former Kerry backers who have thus far declared allegiance to a new candidate, says a Kerry fund-raiser who is not aligned with either Clinton or Obama. Clinton has nabbed the other 14. None of the backers has yet joined any of the other Democratic hopefuls. "Senator Kerry told people that they ought to follow their own conscience," says Jay Dunn, national finance director for Kerry's political action committee.

Pinning down fund-raisers early is one sign of a campaign's viability. Obama's success has surprised some, given his relative inexperience and Clinton's deep ties to the Democratic Party.

Cranking Up The Money Machine Business Week 12 Feb 07

But that was just clever tactics, and an indication that Obama had put together a professional and experienced campaign team. The next move was strategic and implied a cleaner, more process-oriented political philosophy which resonated with voters:

Obama opens his presidential fund-raising drive with a laudable self-imposed ban on accepting money from federal lobbyists, political action committees, registered foreign agents and youths under the age of 16. A common scam for rich donors is to get around federal giving limits by writing checks in the names of their kids -- students or tots who are being used by their parents.

Lynn Sweet - Obama begins fund-raising drive Chicago Sun-Times 1 Feb 07

Herein lay the seed of one of the process messages which both Obama and Edwards would use to distance themselves from the traditional 'top down' fundraising planned by Hillary. This was followed up with a surprisingly successful fundraising campaign in direct competition to Hillary in California and even her native New York. An early investment was the infrastructure for the kind of grass-roots fundraising machine which Howard Dean had pioneered in 2004, leveraging the Internet and his populist appeal and doubling Hillary in the first quarter for number of contributors. This made important early news for his campaign and set the narrative of a populist candidacy as distinct from Hillary's institutional support:


Remember Kerry held the online fundraising records, and Obama's $55 million in Feb beat Kerry's $44 million record. Hillary has yet to break $40 million.

When Kerry endorsed Obama, Hillary's campaign appeared caught off guard. Then Kerry got to work:

Despite his recent political struggles, Kerry still commands a formidable organization as the Democratic Party’s last presidential nominee and gives Obama a leg up among party activists and financiers.

Since announcing his endorsement last month, Kerry has kept a frenetic pace, campaigning in nine states and contributing to the campaign in a slew of other ways, including:

Sending 25 million e-mails to raise support for Obama, including seven messages to each of the 3 million members of johnkerry.com, his online political community

Raising $400,000 online for Obama since his endorsement

Making 47 appearances on national and local television and radio programs to speak on Obama’s behalf

Making 10 trips to campaign for Obama in critical primary states stretching from Massachusetts to California to Texas

Making 60 phone calls to urge key superdelegates to support Obama’s campaign

Kerry, who introduced Obama to the nation by giving him a key speaking role at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, sought to downplay his role in his colleague’s success. But he also noted that key members of his 2004 campaign are deeply involved in the nomination contest.

Among those working for Obama are several of Kerry’s campaign activists in California and his former Florida finance chairman, Kirk Wagar, who raised heaps of money in 2004 and is performing the same role for Obama this year. Also on the Illinois senator’s team is Alan Solomont, Kerry’s Massachusetts finance chairman, who has raised millions in 2008.

link


*** Those 18 delegates: Edwards’ endorsement also did another thing: It undercuts Clinton’s Florida/Michigan argument. As we know by now, Obama will gain a majority of the pledged delegates after Tuesday’s contests in Kentucky and Oregon. But if you award Obama Edwards’ 18 pledged delegates -- who technically can vote for anyone at the convention, but whom you’d also expect to side with Obama -- then Obama, if he picks up about 50 delegates on Tuesday (less than half of the delegates up for grabs that night), he would obtain a majority of pledged delegates even if you include Florida and Michigan’s entire delegations. Here’s the math: 4,051 (the DNC convention voting total) minus 797 (superdelegates) equals 3,254 plus FL’s (185) and MI’s (128) delegates equals 3,567. Divide that by two (and round up), and here’s the number needed for a majority: 1,784. Obama currently has 1,599 pledged delegates. Add in those 18 Edwards delegates, add in our low estimate of 50 for him Tuesday and that gets you to 1,667. Now, add in the Clinton best-case scenarios in MI/FL, giving her the delegates with the voting as is, Obama would then reach a majority of the pledged delegates OVERALL. Assume a 105-67 split in FL and a 73-55 split in MI. That gives Obama a grand total of: 1,789.

<...>

*** The numbers: Obama picked up 4.5 superdelegates delegates yesterday to one for Clinton. (Obama got Lena Taylor, Oklahoma's Mike Morgan, state senate pro tempore as well as 2.5 others overnight; Clinton picked up the endorsement of Tennessee DNC member Vicky Harwell, president of the Tennessee Federation of Democratic Women.) The counts: PLEDGED: Obama 1599 to 1447; SUPERDELEGATES: Obama 287.5 to 276.5; TOTAL: Obama 1,886.5 to 1,723.5. There are 233 superdelegates who remain undecided of the 797 total. Obama needs 139.5 to reach the magic number of 2,026; Clinton needs 302.5. Since last Tuesday, Obama has picked up 31 superdelegates to Clinton's 1.5.

link


May 15, 2008

An Edwards delegate moves

I suspect there will be more of these, but the AP reports on the first Edwards delegate to come out for Obama.

DemConWatch is keeping close track, and has the expected hints from more.


Whether or not Obama gets them, a change is coming.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Track the delegates
Edited on Thu May-15-08 10:05 AM by ProSense
here

Definitely give Obama credit for awesome timing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Obama picked up 4 superdelegates today.
5-15-08 - Added Rep. Jim McDermott (WA) for Obama
-Added Rep. Howard Berman (CA) for Obama
-Added Rep. Henry Waxman (CA) for Obama
- Added DNC Larry Cohen (DC) for Obama

link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. No doubt, Obama picked up one of the best surrogates in Kerry n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Kerry\Obama Relationship history is interesting
Edited on Thu May-15-08 10:45 AM by loyalsister
"The Audacity of Hope" lays out his presidential "blueprint" in progress. There were probably a lot of people encouraging him to run this year pretty soon after Kerry lost.
The response to him- and that speech was not a media invention. I know from talking to people and especially Republican family members that it was very real.

The "grooming" process probably began pretty quickly. He started using the media well - pushing the American dream narrative, and outed himself on drug use early. He also started helping other candidates win their elections (ie Claire McCaskill). Very smart!

I suspect Kerry, Durbin, and Kennedy were probably pretty strong mentors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He's running a really smart campaign
Obama is up against the Clinton wing of the party, which is built on loyalty above all else. They are willing to resort to intimidation and tauting if they don't get their way. Obama managed to render that kind of blind loyalty ineffective. That's change for the better.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:36 AM by loyalsister
Contrary to popular belief, many gen xers hold a healthy suspicion toward most authority figures.

I like many of my peers am watching with a sense of practical and skeptical optimism that entails my own contribution. My own degree of investment determines my cost benefit analysis.

This time it is favorable to me, and something that I will watch carefully throughout the process and hopefully Obama's presidency.

If the rewards of that presidency do not hold up I will definitely have show up to have my interests (mainly health care) represented. Promises have been made.
Although I have yet to begin to donate my time, I am quite emotionally invested. If I am disappointed, I will hold this new president accountable.

Obama seems to welcome attitudes like mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Clintons tried to use the Dem party as their service center while ignoring Dems' needs
just as Bushes did to the GOP.

When anyone looks back on the last 40 years they will see two heads of the same coin in Bush-ClintonInc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Best believe this is a battle for
the soul of the Democratic Party. Change is coming.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Add Daschle to that list. Kerry, Daschle and Durbin have all been key behind the scenes
and why Obama started out with a national political network that functioned much more highly than the stale Clinton team who were counting on name brand and an unending supply of arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Obama's entire strategy caught everyone off guard. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama's timing is nothing short of spectacular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Eight Edwards delegates now moving to Obama
May 15, 2008

Eight Edwards delegates now moving to Obama

Posted: 09:17 PM ET

From CNN Political Producer Peter Hamby, CNN Senior Political Producer Sasha Johnson, CNN's Beth Rotatori

(CNN) – At least six of John Edwards' pledged delegates in South Carolina will throw their support to Barack Obama following Edwards’ endorsement of the Democratic frontrunner, bringing the total number of delegates switching to Obama on Thursday to eight.

One Edwards delegate from Iowa, Machelle Crum, came out for Obama on Thursday morning, as did New Hampshire delegate Joshua Denton. Crum made the decision after receiving a phone call from Edwards supporters encouraging her to make the switch.

In South Carolina, Daniel Boan, Christine Brennan-Bond, Robert Groce, Susan Smith, Mike Evatt and Lauren Bilton — all elected as pledged delegates for Edwards following his third place finish in the primary there on January 29 — announced Thursday they will follow Edwards’ lead and pledge their support to Obama at the Democratic National Convention in August.

John Moylan, the Columbia attorney who directed Edwards’ campaign in the state and is now serving as an alternate delegate for Edwards, appeared on CNN’s “American Morning” Thursday. He stated his support for Obama and hinted that more members of the Edwards delegation would follow later in the day.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. As they should, Barack Obama is exactly the change John Edwards fought for and lead for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC