Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary camp spreading rumors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:01 PM
Original message
Hillary camp spreading rumors?
Can't find anything to back this up...anyone know about this email I received from NARAL today?

The Clinton camp has been spreading the false rumor that Obama is
> against women making their own choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. $100 says that NARAL was lied to.
A whisper campaign par excellence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. friend told me it started in Jan?
just can't find anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think the Clinton camp did that.
That's what I think.

I think rumor and innuendo has been the great shadow influence in this primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. LIES! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. oh yes and the Clinton Camp also said that
raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens ...

Seriously. Obama only has two testicles, below his waist. Shhh. Don't tell anyone. By the way, what exactly IS Obama's stance on abortion, child custody and equal pay? I honestly don't know. If his stance on any of those is to support state's rights, like he proposes with marriage equality, then IF there were such a rumor, I'd be more likely to believe it.

Fortunately, legislative stances should have little to do either way with rumours.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Actually this would be rumors about rumors.
Someone's posing as a victim to party leaders and delegates, and it's not Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Obama has a 100% rating from NARAL. He fully supports
a woman's right to choose. And unlike HIlly he proposes to fully repeal DOMA. Her position on marriage is otherwise exactly like his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Debbie Wassserman Schultz was on MSNBC saying there was "daylight between their positions" on choice
which is totally untrue--the same old crap about the times he was asked to vote present by Planned Parenthood of Chicago. Not surprised Wasserman is trying to point out differences where none exist.

Wasserman was also on Larry King last night with John King filling in and again used the Hillary Camp new "magic number" of 2209. It seems as if they are signaling they are going to try to take this to the convention--but their chances are dwindling for it to be close enough to try and sell this meme to the American public. We will have a nominee soon after June 3rd--as apparently Hillary camp does have the money to compete in the few remaining primaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. If you don't know, you could always learn.
Try reading here:

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

An infomed voter is an asset to our democracy. An uninfomed voter is easily manipulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I am informed on my single issue
which has nothing to do with women's rights or anything else in that rumor. I do agree with you though, the worst kind of voter is an un- or under-informed voter. However, my information about my "single" issue and taking a hard line principled stand means that I can't vote to support Barack or Hillary until they clarify the public record.

I won't give you a link to read. My issue is that my marriage is as equal as anyone else's, and I will call my "partner" a spouse, just like anyone else, regardless of whether or not either candidate agrees that it is proper to do so. Neither candidate does, and that is of record.

Just as in business, where there is no such thing as a "B" (it's A or Fail), in marriage there is no second best. I cannot accept the "second best" of a different moniker and a different schedule of rights for my family than you do for yours; it is a failure of political and moral leadership to differentiate.

but in re the OP: I think we agree in principle on any candidate. It is best to stick to the facts as we know them and as their public stances have made known, and to ignore rumors altogether. If someone told me a rumor that Barack secretly supports real marriage equality I would have to consider only his public stance on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. January
in NH they questioned his pro-choice voting record over the 7 present votes. This was back during presentgate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. someone posted yesterday that Taylor Marsh was behind the outrage but I haven't heard more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. i heard that too.
of course, Bill will repeat it AFTER she repudiates the rumor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. They could be talking about Clinton's New Hampshire mail piece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. wth? thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're welcome. I should point out, of course, that that the Clinton mailer was misleading
Obama's "present" votes were consistent with Planned Parenthood's strategy to counteract anti-choice bills.

http://ppaurora.blogspot.com/2008/02/setting-record-straight-illinois-nows.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. NOW did it too, on Super Tuesday
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/04/AR2008020402980.html

It's shocking to me that any Clinton supporter would deny it. I thought everybody knew about this. This is just one of so many dishonest campaign tactics that her and her supporters have engaged in, and they wonder why Obama's supporters want her as far away from the Dems as we can get her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. roseanne barr lied about that when she
endorsed hilary(saying Obama voted against women's choice)..a bunch a lyin' women supporting a lyin' woman.

And yet Obama is the nominee and they will vote their rights away by voting for mccain..so not only are they liars.. they're stupid liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. I think she just believed the propaganda
Some people just don't understand that Democrats can, and do, lie. Others have a hard time believing a woman would lie. Roseanne has been such a champion for women, I imagine it's very hard for her to believe anything bad about Hillary. I don't think she would ever intentionally lie, but she has sure been wrong about a lot of things over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. holy shit... you actually recieved an email from NARAL saying that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. here is complete email
I've been hearing that a lot of pro-choice voters are being fooled
> by John McCain, and have no idea he's really anti-choice - and I
> want to make sure you're not one of them.
>
> The Clinton camp has been spreading the false rumor that Obama is
> against women making their own choices.
>
> Sen. Barack Obama is the pro-choice candidate to win the White
> House in November. He's voted against Bush's anti-choice Supreme
> Court nominees, cosponsored legislation to fix the birth control
> pricing crisis, and said that women's ability to control their
> reproductive lives is "not just an issue of choice, but equality
> and opportunity for all women." Those are some pretty inspiring words!
>
> I hope you take a moment to learn more about Sen. Obama through
> NARAL Pro-Choice America's website,
> http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/. NARAL Pro-Choice
> America has vote histories on both Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain,
> neat videos, and buttons for your Facebook page.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Paid for by NARAL Pro-Choice America, www.ProChoiceAmerica.org
> <http://www.ProChoiceAmerica.org>, and not authorized by any
> candidate or candidate's committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. that is so fucked up... and people bitch about the womens voices letters....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Which is, of course, why NARAL endorsed him yesterday.
Because they really don't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joneschick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. NARAL in some states is working to maintain neutrality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hillary's camp has been spreading false rumors about Obama for a year.
What's the latest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. More like you spreading rumors about Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. this isn't from the OP. it comes straight from NARAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC