Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If not Obama's First Choice, why would Hillary want the VP spot, since he decides her duties?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:06 PM
Original message
If not Obama's First Choice, why would Hillary want the VP spot, since he decides her duties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. In that vein, does Bush decide Darthy's duties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. i think darthy decides bush's duties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah like bush does cheney's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Cheney was Bush's only choice. And yes, his duties are what Bush wants, whatever Cheney wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bush lacks the ability to read a book or feed himself
So of course Darth would take on a different role. I don't see the dynamic as being the same with the future President/VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think this was a deal. I have been trying to think back in this and
if I re-call Clinton was the first to bring the Vice-President into the WH. With his own office. They usually had an office in that old building behind the WH. I do not think Hillary's style would go with Obama and I am betting she comes with Bill. I see Obama as getting working 'whites' as he has done it over and over in many states. It seems to be the die-hards in the Mt. states that will not go with him. Look at the Va. Map. West part of state was like the other states with the same type pop. They are just going to stay in the old style of thinking like their grandparents etc. I think Hillary would hurt Obama and not help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. POTUS doesn't have constitutional authority over VPOTUS
Edited on Thu May-15-08 03:15 PM by tritsofme
It usually works out that way, but you could technically have a president and VP that are constantly at odds with eachother.

The difference being of course that POTUS could consolidate all the power into his office, where the only real responsibility of VPOTUS is to be president of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Isn't that how it's generally been?
At least until Bush/Cheney changed everything? The VP used to be looked at as pretty much the most boring job in the administration. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You're right, but you're wrong
Contitutionally, there are two duties for the Vice President. They preside over the Senate and cast the tie breaking vote and they sit and wait for something to happen to the president.

Anything beyond those duties is 100% determined by the president.

Obama doesn't even have to give his Veep an office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hillary's weakness as a VP candidate would be her diviseness. If elected, she'd be a wicked good VP.
I bet Obama personally feels the same way.

If, for example, 1 month into his second term, Obama's VP suddenly retired, I think a Hillary appointment would make a lot of sense. But in terms of having her on the ticket, I just cannot see picking a VP who actually costs the ticket votes (I'm not saying she'd cost the ticket NET votes, but she have a substantial minus column as well as a plus column in the votes-gained-versus-votes-lost analysis)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Precedent as set by Washington
Adams was included in no aspect whatsoever of the Washington administration.

The only constitutional duties of a vice president is to preside over the Senate and wait for something to happen to the person who occupies the big chair.

Other than that, the Vice President has no duties outside whatever bones the president chooses to throw them.

I guarantee you, Hillary does not want that job..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just from watching Hillary for a long time now...
...what I am thinking about her wanting the VP position is so she can get her foot in the door and then take over.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why would he even offer VP to somebody who doesn't think he's ready to be commander in chief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I started this thread in response to the forced vote for her at the convention thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. because she would do whatever she wanted
He'd have to put her under house arrest to stop her from running off the leash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because he's much less likely to win the GE without her.
And she cares about the Supreme Court and all those other issues, too.

If he wants to extend an olive branch and make it clear to her supporters that he's concerned about them and wants their vote, asking her to be his VP is the best way to do it.

I doubt this would be terribly easy for either Clinton or Obama.

But this would be the best way to convince her supporters to vote for him.

And it might be the only way he can get his supporters to stop bashing Hillary's supporters and driving them away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well, what if he chose a woman other than Hillary?
Would that make HRC fans okay with him as a candidate? Like what if he chose, Claire McCaskill, who has been a loyal advocate from the start? He needs someone without baggage who is also well qualified. And maybe a woman running mate would inspire those women who desperately wish to see a female President some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. If the situation were reversed, would Obama supporters be thrilled if the VP were
another black politician? If Hillary thought she could get all his supporters while ignoring him, just by picking another AA man with fairly similar views?

Are you kidding?

Can't you understand how these suggestions sound?

Think of the condescension inherent in suggesting that Hillary's supporters would find Obama choosing another woman as his running mate perfectly okay.

"Those women politicans, they all look alike -- who'd know the difference?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. but there is a difference--you can't really reverse it that way.
Obama isn't running as the first black President, and Hillary is running as the first woman President. She's said so many times. And we hear talk about her supporters hanging on because they want to see a woman take the office. That's why I'm thinking that a woman running mate would go at least part way toward making those same women happier with Obama. She wouldn't be Hillary, but she'd be a woman in the second highest office.

Of course if Obama should do this, people would say he's pandering. And if he chooses a white man, people will say he's pandering for the white male vote. And if he picks Bill Richardson, people will say he's pandering to the Latino vote. I don't know who he could pick and not be accused of something--unless he picks a black male. Then they'd be saying something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. BS, putting her on the ticket makes his entire campaign of Change a just Slogan
Besides, I can't imagine that he wants Bill Clinton as a co-vice president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC