Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beckel says VP slot is Hillary's if she wants it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:43 PM
Original message
Beckel says VP slot is Hillary's if she wants it
Edited on Fri May-16-08 06:44 PM by Alhena
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/if_clinton_wants_to_be_vp_obam.html

This article makes the most overlooked point in this whole VP discussion- the VP nomination is a position that the DELEGATES at the convention vote on, and Hillary will arive with 46% of the delegates in her pocket. All she needs to do is sway enough superdelegates and she's the VP whether Obama likes it or not.

Hillary is not my first choice, but I just don't think it's worth the political capital it would require to deny her the spot if she really wants it. What kind of convention will we have if Obama is having to work the phones to keep Hillary from getting even the second spot? It would look terrible to women voters in particular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then he woke to find it was only a dream...SDs will not have that anchor around the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. It would not be a very smart move for Hillary to take the spot.
She can be much more powerful for much longer as the Senator from NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyToad Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Yeah, right, being vice president is nothing compared to....
....being one of hundreds of senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. What does Jekyll say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I Seriously Doubt That Scenario nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. It would look smart to this woman voter if Obama refused to have HRC as VP
She has nothing positive to offer the ticket.

And frankly I do not trust her anymore.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. May sound corny but I have built up
a trust in Obama that tells me ..he will not to that to us, the country, and himself.

I don't know care or know who beckel is but I'm guessing he wants controversary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. Bob "Where's the beef?" Beckel.
Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. She does not bring a state nor does she bring military gravitas especially after
Snipergate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who gives a flying fuck what Beckel says?
And why is it that the ONLY people saying this crap, are known Clinton suckups??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I thought Beckel supported Obama
I remember how PO'ed he was when the Wright story broke- he was angry because he thought it would give Hillary the nomination according to a report I read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama could make the pick before the convention....
Edited on Fri May-16-08 06:50 PM by tokenlib
..in an attempt to short circuit the Clinton people. Not all Clinton people are going to be trying to force her on the ticket. Some of them actually believe the nominee should pick their running mate.

Actually, with the convention being so late--it is likely the pick will be made in advance..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:52 PM
Original message
He can pick whoever he wants, but the delegates actually make it happen
As I said in my post, I expect he could expend enough political capital to deny Hillary the second spot. But if he did, she and her supporters would probably make the convention a disaster. I just don't think it would be worth it. I wish Hillary didn't want the VP spot, but she apparently does and having 46% of the delegates at the convention, as well as strong connections to most of the superdelegates, means she has a lot to say in this regard. The Obama supporters thinking otherwise are deluding themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't agree that the likely President of the United States...
...should kow tow to a bunch of people just because they will wreck havoc at the convention.

Let them.

Just because she lost to Obama, does not mean she's entitled to the vp slot.

Obama gets to choose.

They're have been convention battles just as contentious, if not more so, than this one.

I don't recall those winners selecting the political opponent with whom they were engaged in battle.

I wish people would just stop. Quit defining reality--with Hillary Clinton and her magical wrath
at the epicenter of the universe. No one is going to die or explode if Hillary doesn't get her way.

Obama will pick his vp. It won't be Hillary. Life will move on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Obama doesn't "get" to choose.
It usually works out that way, but delegates nominate the VP, not a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. We'll see...
Edited on Fri May-16-08 09:29 PM by TwoSparkles
If Obama wants her, that's fine.

However, how would a Presidency work if he was forced to pick her, and he
really hated her with a white-hot passion.

I doubt the delegates would usurp the will of our nominee. Much in the same
way that the Super delegates would not usurp the will of the people, as Hillary
suggested continuously.

Are we back to asserting things that are never going to happen?

Obama will select a running mate. The delegates will confirm that person. End of story.

Enough with the outrageous possibilities--all of which defy common sense and benefit Hillary Clinton.

Aren't you guys tired of leveraging her with these outrageous, extraordinary scenarios?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
46. Typically, the VP pick comes a few weeks prior to the convention
Kerry announced Edwards two weeks prior to the '04 convention.

I don't expect to see a VP selection until early August. It will be enough time to get the whole primary mess out of everyone's systems, and gauge where the party's going, sans Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Who is "Beckel?"
:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Bob Beckel- he was Mondale's campaign manager. A good Dem who knows how the process works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Ah, the born-again Christian, Washington insider who is regularly on FUX Noise..
No thanks. I've had enough of people like him.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
44. Was that photo taken around 3:00 AM?
Good to know she's still up after midnight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Earlier, right before she changed into a...
:D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, I gues that settles it, then.
If Beckel says it, it must be so. I keep forgetting he's the last word when it comes to how the country is run.

:sarcasm:





















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. But he is right on one point and that is if Hillary is so obsessed with it
that she wants to fight for it she will have enough support to bring it to the floor.

Nobody wants a floor fight so there may be no alternative.

I mean how rational a team player does she appear to be?


After her 3rd place in Iowa I asked a friend of mine how much humiliation would she be willing to put up with to stay in the campaign. He had a two word reply

Blue Dress.

The Clintons are not going to not do it because it might be embarassing - they are way beyond that. It is all power brass knuckles now and they seem to want the VP almost as bad as the Presidency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
47. LOL.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's the President's choice...
Edited on Fri May-16-08 06:55 PM by TwoSparkles
Listen, I spent the last year, experiencing Hillary and her crass air of inevitability toward the
Presidency.

Please tell me I don't have to listen to another round of her crass, self-centered bullshit
about how she's entitled to the vp slot.

For the love of Pete...this is so insane.

The President selects the vp, based on with whom he wants to work during the next four years. He
must trust that person and be philosophically in line with that person. He must see that
person as bringing something special to the ticket--that jives with his politics and eithics. It's
his decision. He's earned the right to make that decision.

Not Hillary.

I'm really done with Hillary's sense of entitlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qijackie Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Don't be silly. Plenty of P-VP pairs didn't get along at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. Obama doesn't seem like the type...
...of political hack who would pick a running mate for
purely political, easy reasons.

This is a new kind of politics, after all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. The third time, minimum, this article has been posted this week
And the third time, minimum, it has been wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. thats a death sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Let me know when Beckel becomes the nominee. Then I'll pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hillary would make a wonderful VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. I don't care what you think of Beckel he is right
Give you an example

Rep McDermott WA just endorsed Obama. His district and state are for Obama why did he wait?

Because when he had all his legal bills from the radio message litigation Bill Clinton got on a plane and flew to Washington and had a fund raiser and retired his bills.

Guys like that may say no to Hillary once but not twice.

Clinton has built up 20 years of IOUs and they showed everyone just what happens when you blow up that bridge with Richardson.

If she really wants it - and I think she does - it will be very hard to deny it.

Her whole campaign for the last 4 weeks has not been to show that she can win the nomination but how much she brings as a VP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Hillary is impotent and everyone knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. lol just because she barely missed on the nomination she can still do a great deal of harm
and that is her power. If she gives Obama a perfunctory endorsement it will hurt - a floor fight at the convention over FL and MI will hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. They should penalize MI and FLA 1/2, no SD's, count MI uncommitted for O
and just end it. He has the Sd's to get the nom, this stupid MI FLA shit will finally be over, and we'll have a strong candidate who is FREE to choose his own running mate. One that will be more effective and trustworthy than you know who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. She is tens of millions of dollars in debt, she has no backers and is fronting a campaign
She blew a huge lead, name recognition, judgemnent calls, a huge machine, she had everything and blew it. Nobody has faith in her hence the lack of fundraising and her funding her own campaign.

You may believe she still weilds authourity or power but she hasn't really had any to people who have been paying attention since mid February.

How will she convince people a month from now after she is further in debt and losing by a larger margin that she should force a VP slot on Obama? She can't; pinch yourself , click your heels, whatever, wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Which is net negative
I'd rather have an effective gov't then risk having her and Bill trying to hamstring Obama at every turn. I'd be pretty nervous for his safety also, because a change of Presidents would just slam us right back into the same old shit that we say we are supposedly tired of. I'm not saying the Clintons would try to take Obama down, but there could be criminals from the current admistration that would recognize the benefits of a Hillary Presidency and would absolutely do whatever it takes to get away with their crimes. I will not back down from that statement, and I would lose much enthusiasm for the party if she worms her way onto the ticket. Enough of the Clintons self-gratification. Enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamnua Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. No way !!
I keep posting this over and over again. She is a woman of intelligence, class, and integrity and she has political nous. She is not going to end up as Obama's political mudguard even if he got down on both knees and pleaded with her. There is no way she will diminish herself by associating with this pseudomessiah.This woman of maturity is simply not going to play second fiddle to a character with the resume the size of a postage stamp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. My God, I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. I don't believe it... I think Obama will have the requisite number without her delegates
then that bargain is out the window
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. It's Obama's only shot at winning
However, I feel Obama would still likely lose in the GE, even with Clinton running as VP.

After the way these people have worked for the destruction of the Clintons, I would hate to see Hillary lose it all with Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Bullshit. She's only be a detriment to his campaign.
Her presence would be a constant reminder that she repeatedly implied that John McCain would make a better president than Obama. The GOP would have a field day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sorry, but the loser does not choose the VP slot for the winner
Another lame brained idea from the die hard Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Exactly. It is just as important to get the VP he wants as it is to win the nom, in my opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. It could be just as ruinous to the Democratic Party to force a VP candidate on the
presidential nominee, as to endure a knockdown dragout fight against Clinton supporters, to keep the nominee's right to pick his VP in tact.

Either thing could be disastrous. And what if Obama doesn't want Clinton (and I'm pretty sure he doesn't), and has Clinton foisted upon him? What does that say about him and his leadership? What message does that send about the party's faith in him? What troubles might lay ahead in such a campaign? And if they managed to win--how could Obama work with a VP who had (to some extent) run a racist strategy against him? (--such a personal insult, as well as unethical.)

It's just too volatile, too wrong. And surely most Clinton delegates will see this. Likely only a few are such diehards as to want to weaken the nominee in this way, and turn the campaign, and the administration (if they could win in that circumstance), into a bed of nails for the Democratic candidate.

True, devil's marriages like this, of opposite and contentious people as president and V-P candidates (and administrations), have occurred. JFK and LBJ come to mind. But it is not wise. It the sort of backroom deal that party bosses used to make, and I'm afraid that, in this circumstance, it would have a very heavy meaning. It would not just mean that a particular candidate was foisted upon the nominee; it would mean that the old political establishment--the pro-war, pro-corporate Bush enablers of the DLC--would have neutralized Obama, his supporters and the new politics that they advocate, and would have retained a big foothold from which to do great mischief to an Obama adminsitration, including trying to seize back the party machinery for restoring a top-down, anti-grass roots organization. It would be a huge slap in the face to Obama's amazing supporters, who have fought so hard for a new direction for the party and the country.

Obama will most likely arrive at the convention with the delegate votes to win the nomination on the first round. It is VERY UNLIKELY, in my opinion, that those same delegates would then turn around and strike him down, by voting for someone he DOESN'T WANT as his VP. They will instead want to know who he wants, and they will give him what he wants.

Clinton risks all her power in the party if she does this--forces herself on Obama as VP. The likelihood is that the convention delegates would hand her a major defeat, if she tries it. It is far better for the party--and for her career--that she sit back now and play the wise broker. She surely has delegate power at the convention. To use it for such a purpose would be very unwise. What could she use it for? How about to get Obama to back the Equal Rights Amendment? That's a win-win for both of them. That would rally the women who supported Clinton because of women's rights. And it would put McBush in a very awkward position. Someone here at DU proposed this the other day. I can't remember who. It is a fabulous idea. Clinton could head the new Obama commission to pass the Equal Rights Amendment. She would thus go down in history with a REALLY BIG VICTORY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, and remove the smell of the Colombia death squads that Mark Penn brought to her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
42. Historically, the selection of the VP belongs singularly to the
candidate. Each presidential season, near convention time, we have always been reminded of that inasmuch as EVERYONE starts pushing for his or her own favorite, spinning all the time as they do. I do not think THIS CONVENTION will break from tradition, regardless of what rumors Bill and Hillary have surrogates float.

If Obama becomes the nominee, the selection will be his choice. And Hillary and Bill will have to live with whatever that choice is.

And that's it in a nutshell.

Sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC