Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

it just pisses me when Clinton says she won the popular vote when

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:22 PM
Original message
it just pisses me when Clinton says she won the popular vote when
Obama was not even on the ballot in one of those states. It is just plain lying. And I don't understand why no one has called her on it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. you misheard her.
she won A popular vote. It just rhymes with the.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not only that it's also not counting Caucasus either that they want to do...
Any way possible will do so long as Hillary can steal this nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeker30 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. He took his name off. Stop whining
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. ...as did every other major candidate except Clinton....
...and she STILL had over 40% of the voters vote against her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I think we all know
... that you can't count Michigan in any estimate of the popular vote. I know you're feeling bad about Hillary's situation, just like I didn't feel so good about Edwards having to drop out, but it's time to dry your tears and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
62. okay, since you count Michigan, every other state is counted
correct? i'm trying to find out how many votes she counted from Iowa, Nevada and Washington. Can you help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. And maine
add those in, and even the Clinton Canard of Pop Vote puts her behind in the neighborhood of 80,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
68. FL and MI
broke the rules, yet that doesn't matter to hillbots. you stop whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
78. "the rules are the rules"- Terry McAuliffe, 2003
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/25/165935/668

"Carl, take it to the bank," I said. "They will not get a credential. The closest they'll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state."


Better get movin, pal, I think you've got a goalpoast to catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
80. he was required to, and so was she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. She hasn't "won" any such thing - there... I called her on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not to mention that she's totally EXCLUDING the caucus voters ...
It's like she thinks the caucus state participants DON'T EVEN
EXIST in her alternate universe. She's abandoned the reality-
based community, imho ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:26 PM
Original message
It's also a lie even including those states
Desperate times call for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. So he took his name off of the ballot because he couldn't win.
Edited on Mon May-19-08 06:26 PM by prodn2000
And now people think he is entitled to ALL of the undecideds and then some?

Nah.

He can have 1/3 of the undecided vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. that does not include current polling
according to Rasmussen, their latest Michigan poll on March 6 had Clinton with 41% and Obama with 41%. A may 7th poll shows McCain with 44% against Clinton with 44% while McCain polls at 45% versus Obama with 44%.

So it does not appear that a delegate split of 2-1 or worse for Hillary reflects the will of the voters of Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
61. People tend to jump on the bandwagon.
That is the ONLY explanation for a "change of heart."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Gotta link to that assertion or are you just blowing smoke? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. that is a LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. It's not a lie
just not the whole truth.

It wasn't just that he'd lose: there was pandering, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
64. how many votes did she count from Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. That's his MO
"he took his name off of the ballot because he couldn't win."

Just like he knew he'd lose WV and KY...he didn't campaign...then he'd have a good excuse for losing. It also wasn't very good political judgment to take his name off the ballot in MI. In fact she was predicted to win and all the others were scared off too...except Kouch...none of them wanted to lose...easy decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. That's nonsense
the reason ALL the other candidates took their names off the ballot was because MI was being sanctioned.

The only reason they were all still on the FL ballot was because they tried to get them off and it was too late.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #50
60. I totally agree.
At that stage of the game he couldn't just lose, though, he had to not even play the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
52. He didn't take his name off because he couldn't win
Obama, Biden, Richardson, Kucinich and the rest took their names off because Michigan was being sanctioned,

The ONLY reason the names were ON the ballot in FL is because it was too late to take them off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
57. My god... does it HURT you to lie so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
67. Lie?
Not I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I just read that
(even though Clinton has already been saying that she has "more votes". Hmmmkay...) Clinton is going to counter the fact that Obama will get the majority of pledged delegates tomorrow (which the Clinton campaign has been complaining about non-stop) by making a huge show about how she has "won the popular vote" tomorrow night in her Kentucky victory (go to hillaryclinton.com!) speech. So, we'll have two victors tomorrow night! I don't think even the media that wants to see this go to the convention is going to play enabler to this bs anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yup ... HRC won't be happy, but her speech is going to have to go first ...
because his victory will be determined in Oregon, and their results
will come in later. But watch her try and step on his speech anyway ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. 75% or more of Oregon has already voted
and they'll be counting votes all day while the remainder come in. If they can call it early, I wonder if they will, or if they have to wait until the deadline at 8pm pacific time, which is pretty late east coast time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. plus not counting the 4 caucus states that don't have popular totals - it is DISGUSTING that she
does this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
66. are you telling me that they count Michigan but exclude Iowa and other states
and she considers this fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama should hold an unsanctioned online vote that doesn't count and...
Edited on Mon May-19-08 06:37 PM by sfam
then proclaim he has 50 million more votes than Hillary. Who cares if they weren't DNC sanctioned contests? All the votes should count, dammit!!! In fact, I'm offended that folks outside the US can't vote. Obama should let the entire world vote in this online election - as many times as they want in fact. ALL the votes must be counted!!!

And best yet, this will be just as valid as the Michigan vote!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. How is it a lie?
He chose to remove his name, therefore got no votes. It's a fact you don't like, but it's not a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. She doesn't count any caucus states, either. And as you know, she SAID the MI vote won't count...
and 40% of people voted "uncommitted." Just the other day a MI Obama supporter said he voted "uncommitted" for OBAMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You're changing the subject
How many votes did Obama get in Michigan? Clinton says zero. I think she's correct. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. okay then she is purposely being a _ _ _ _ _
very misleading and she knows it..

Might as well call it a lie because thats what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. WE DON'T KNOW since he wasn't on the ballot. So the "voice of the voters" wasn't heard...
not to mention the caucus states that she doesn't count. Both of their names were on the ballot in THOSE states. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well then Obama shouldn't have removed his name, should he?
But the fact remains, he did. And therefore, got no votes in michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes he should've. He wasn't being sneaky like SHE was. And again-SHE DOESN'T COUNT ANY CAUCUS
STATES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Then how does she have the right to not count caucuses?
A vote is a vote to her.. But only when she says so..
She is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. crickets-He STILL hasn't addressed that point.
But he's a Hillary supporter. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. because it's off-topic
this is about whether she's lying by not giving Obama votes from Michigan. You guys keep trying to change the subject. Start a thread on it if you want.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yep, you know she is a liar.
She counts MI when it will not count and disregard caucus states votes for no good fucking reason at all. She is disgrace pure and simple. She should be kicked out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. See ya! Wouldn't wanna BE ya!
Edited on Mon May-19-08 07:19 PM by jenmito
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
75. i stuck with the subject and said Obama got zero votes in Michigan
and cannot get an answer from you or anyone else about how many votes she is counting from Iowa, Nevada, Washington state and Maine.

if she insists on counting Michigan is she counting all the votes everywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Man, Ignored gets way too much attention
It's time to move on people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. You're right.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Seriously, it's time for them to get "left behind"
:D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Yeah, you're right. It's time to get the Monkey off my back.
:D :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. so Michigan voted for Stalin, Kim Jong, Castro, which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. Maybe, but 40& of the state voted for
"not clinton" so who should get the delegates that represent those votes?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. Nobody because Hillary said so. She needs to change the rules so she
can win. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
74. yes Obama did get zero votes in Michigan
how many votes is Hillary counting from Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. It is purposely missleading the noninformed..
There are dumb asses that believe they both had their name on the ballot..

She does it for money pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. She's lying. She doesn't count ANY of the caucus states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
54. And that's it exactly
There are many people, especially older people, who don't have computers and access Internet websites. All they know is what they hear on television, radio and from their neighbors. Many of them will be permanently left with the impression she won the popular vote but still lost the nomination. It's her way to trying to stain Obama with the "illegitimate" stain, much like the one Bush* carries.

And she will continue in other ways to undermine Obama. This is just the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
77. That's true. Most people proably don't even know that Obama and
everyone else except Hillary weren't on the ballot so if she says she won they just believe her. I's playing on people's ignorance of the process and that's not fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
43. It's a distortion because the only scenario under which she has more
popular votes is by NOT COUNTING the 4 caucus states while COUNTING FL & MI. Of all the scenarios, that is the only one whereby she has more popular votes (less than 30,000).

So she's running around the country complaining to all these late states that "they" don't want "your" vote to count, but I have the most popular votes... and she's not counting the votes in 4 states.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
63. Because the Mich. primary has been ruled unconstitutional.... legally, it never happened....
...and therefore, neither did any of the votes in that state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. And she doesn't include any caucus states, either.
Yet most in the MSM just go along with her math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaniac Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Hillary Clinton is delusional at this point...
She has no sense of history. This won't pass the laugh test two months from now and she's still going to lose.

This is only a way to appeasing her bruised ego. She can't accept that she lost, so she has to invent a fiction that she really won. No one but her, and her supporters, buys it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I know and I think the SDs know, too, which is why they're NOT flocking to her...
even after her 41 point win! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
70. thank God, the SDs are not fools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. I hear ya it is pure bullshit.. Supers are not stupid, thus the reason they are "clinging" to Obama
Edited on Mon May-19-08 06:42 PM by Bensthename

She just uses that to spur up some money from her groupies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think you were pissed before Hillary said a word.
Like all Clintophobes, you were pre-pissed. You'd be mad at her no matter what she said--or failed to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
49. No I didn't start hating her until mid march, prior to I thought her unfavorables too high
still do, only they are higher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. Obama's have virtually caught up with hers--on a few months. And don't forget his charming wife.
Edited on Mon May-19-08 08:03 PM by Perry Logan
Does this mean you'll be hating the Obamas, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Obama has not sunk to gutter politics, my disdain for HRC is due to her actions
When Obama brings up Snipergate or uses it in an attack ad then I will concede he is playing gutter politics

Too bad for HRC her kitchen sink strategy tarnished her also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. There are no votes in a caucus, that's why it's called (surprise) a "caucus".
I have never heard the phrase "it just pisses me" before, what part of the country do you live in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. So what you're saying is that it's ok with you that she's trying to say that the rules don't matter
Edited on Mon May-19-08 07:29 PM by housewolf
The primary election is about delegate selection, it's not a popularity contest. America is not a direct democracy, regarless of how many Americans think that it is. It's not; it is a representation democracy.

Caucuses are about allocatng delegates for a candidate; primary elections are about allocating delegates for candidates. They are a different process but the goal is the same: to allocate a state's number of delegates to the candidates.

Hillary's stand now that it should be about the popular vote is saying that the rules should be changed now from the way the entire primary season was set up (and has been for decades) and we should look at something different but oh, by the way, those states that used a caucus system don't count.

It's about as bogus a claim as anyone could make.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. Heres how she claims it....
She actually has him by 139,427, if you count it with Florida and Michigan, but exclude caucuses. Any other way you look at it Obama has her beat.

This is why I dislike Hillary sooo.... much, she likes to stretch and twist the truth.

TOTAL OBAMA HILLARY
TOTAL 12,891,604 12,217,745 (w/o FL & MI - w/caucuses and territories)
TOTAL 13,460,645 13,403,104 (w/ FL&MI, w/caucuses)

TOTAL 12,891,604 11,889,594 (w/o MI - w/caucuses and territories)
TOTAL 12,535,451 11,730,409 (w/o MI - excludes caucuses)

TOTAL 12,535,451 12,058,560 (w/o FL & MI - excludes caucuses)
TOTAL 13,104,492 >13,243,919< (w/ FL & MI - excludes caucuses)

Florida 569,041 857,208
Michigan XXX,XXX 328,151
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. "she likes to stretch and twist the truth" kind of like landing under sniper fire and running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
42. there is no popular vote, only pledged and super delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
47. Even it she drops this and adds this and that,
the popular vote alone is only a bargaining chip to go to the SD's and grab Obama's delegates away from his firm grasp and have the SD's overturn enough delegates to then add up enough for Clinton to have the lead.

When SD's are going for Obama today, how she will get this overturn, and not only grabbing them from Obama but also from the will of the people - which is why they are pretty much there to begin with... will be a feat that could be given a 'I dare you to even try it' type of unrealistic feat that is another impossibility. Unless they want to see crowds like Oregon's 80,000 storming the convention doors, thus given Rush L. his wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
55. Hillary insists on
leading her supporters on with misinformation. Every time I let myself feel a bit bad for her, she pulls more crap. I'm happy I changed my mind about her back in January. I'd be pulling my hair out right now if I had voted for her. I once thought Obama didn't have enough experience. Now I think Clinton doesn't have enough character. She reinforces the way I feel about her daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
65. It's also lying when there are states with caucuses and no popular vote tally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. Well...thankfully Arizona has a primary!
(And she won that too!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
71. Saddam Hussein had "elections" with only one name on the ballot-were those valid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
73. it does not matter WHY his name was not on the ballot- IT WASN'T ON. ELECTION INVALID. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. because you say so? We'll see how the party insiders rule on that
. . .and let's hope they decide in favor of the folks who bothered to vote.

Fact is, Sen. Obama thought he was saving himself the embarrassment of badly trailing Clinton there so he willingly took his name off to have this muddle of interpretation of the votes cast. The others calculated that way as well.

IT WAS A PURELY POLITICAL CALCULATION TO TAKE THEIR NAMES OFF OF THE BALLOT. They saw an opportunity to appear neutral in a state where Hillary Clinton was heavily favored. The outcome is their own fault, and her legitimate advantage, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #76
79. "Well, you know, It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything."
Hillary's words. And she's not counting ANY votes in ANY caucus state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
81. So the woman who says that all 50 states need their voices heard and not 48...
ignores the twelve caucus states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC