Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Math...Hillary and her donors claim lead in popular vote.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:29 PM
Original message
The New Math...Hillary and her donors claim lead in popular vote.
Amazingly, in keeping with the clueless nature of the corporate media...there is not a word about delegate count being the criteria.

I wonder how many will take her claim seriously, not realizing that the Democratic party chooses their nominee based on delegate count. The article uses the word "pugnacious", but I have some more choice words.

She includes the unsanctioned primaries in Michigan and Florida, but the NYT calls her out on that count.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is entering the Kentucky and Oregon primaries on Tuesday with one of the most pugnacious political messages of her campaign: That she is ahead in the national popular vote when all votes are counted, including from the unsanctioned primaries in Michigan and Florida, and that party leaders who have a vote as super-delegates should reflect this level of appeal.

This argument is of a piece with Mrs. Clinton’s increasingly populist image, as a fighter on behalf of average people, but it is also a debatable claim: Most tallies of the national popular vote put Mr. Obama in the lead, especially when Michigan and Florida are not counted.

...."If all states with popular vote totals are counted — which would exclude four caucus states that have not released numbers — Mrs. Clinton would lead Mr. Obama by more than 26,000 votes out of more than 33 million cast. By other calculations, Mr. Obama is ahead in the popular vote.

As Time Runs Short, Clinton Claims Lead in Popular Vote


I thought Bob Zimmerman's "new math" interpretation about FL and MI was totally completely utterly amazing. But what else is new...this whole campaign of hers has been that way. Breaking new ground, making new rules, ignoring the fact that there is a party organization.

Robert Zimmerman, a New York media consultant who is a major fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton, said the popular-vote argument was a good political framework for her candidacy because it emphasizes her electability in the fall. He also said it would be fair to count Michigan and Florida when Democrats are also counting the votes from state caucuses, which require people to participate at a certain time of the day, and therefore tend to leave shift workers and laborers at a disadvantage.

“The controversies concerning the inequities of the caucus system, the Michigan and Florida primaries and the focus on electability by both campaigns makes the issue of the popular vote critically important to superdelegates,” Mr. Zimmerman said. “It should be expected that any potential nominee wins the popular vote on the way to the nomination”


Because caucus votes count for Obama...they should be allowed to count the popular vote for their side????

Eeeeeek!

I felt a good deal of satisfaction that Terry McAuliffe was shouted down in Colorado at a convention of 10,000 people when he tried the "new math".

McAuliffe claims popular vote lead for Hillary...shouted down.

The "I am winning the popular vote" thingy actually works. I have had words here locally trying to convince them that is not how it is done. It was a really brilliant ploy by her campaign, and it works very well on uninformed voters.

Do you think the media even knows how the party chooses its nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. isnt this precisely what they got booed for in colorado?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly
It doesn't bother them they are booed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh dear. Looks like Wrong Way Hillary goofed again. The nod is decided on delegate count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. She's looking more like the Black Knight in Monty Python's The Holy Grail every day.
"It's just a flesh wound"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eMkth8FWno

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a dumb ass claim...
if our candidate were to be selected based on pop. vote, wouldn't we have to have a national primary and do away with caucuses all together? And doesn't that infringe on states rights? And can I have some of whatever Hillary and her crew are smoking???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. You don't want what they're smoking.
It makes you act delusional and stoopid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Non-Rovian Math

Hillary narrowly gets one row in a spreadsheet that should be titled, "Every Possible Wrong Way to Count the Popular Vote Except One."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I have posted that link for people, they still stay in denial.
Because their mindset is so strong now, it can not be changed. The Clinton campaign has tried to build anger in her supporters. That is the sad part.

The audio of her conference call.

http://www.taylormarsh.com/audio.php?audio=http://www.taylormarsh.com/podcast/mp3/stream.2008-05-16.134204.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Removed -- Duplicate
Edited on Mon May-19-08 11:55 PM by Youphemism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I had realized they were slimey, but I never dreamed they'd sink this low.
I continue to be amazed at how far they push the boundaries of decency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Desperate and delusional...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaStrega Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. ...
*real* math

:kick: rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep, that is the real math.
They are right up to the minute on all things pertaining to the convention.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaStrega Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. True that!
:hi: right back atcha :) and a :toast: to boot :bounce: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. The popular vote is important also, have you forgotten Al Gore winning the popular
vote in 2000? There was major debate about getting rid of the electoral college.

If our party nominee can't win the popular vote in the primaries, what the hell kind of candidate is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. But he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. First the pimaries are far from over. And B, from your link-
Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)** Obama-16,684,752 47.6% Clinton-16,711,719 47.7%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. With Michigan but neither IA, WA, NV, and ME. About as arbitrary as it gets.
Adding all the states including MI, Obama wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. Hillary's wants us to count contests that don't...and discount contests that do.
Does she really think folks are that dumb? Oh, I see at least one DUer is...above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. What about the other 5 lines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Al Gore won the popular vote in the general election...
there is no sure way to count popular vote in primaries because of caucus states, but even so, Hillary's claim is dubious at best:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++If all states with popular vote totals are counted — which would exclude four caucus states that have not released numbers — Mrs. Clinton would lead Mr. Obama by more than 26,000 votes out of more than 33 million cast. By other calculations, Mr. Obama is ahead in the popular vote. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/us/politics/19cnd-clinton.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Geez, the google is your friend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. That was my point, Gore won the popular vote and it was part of the reason
that many people wanted changes in the electoral college. Reading comprehension is your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'm typing slowly so maybe you will catch on...
The primary has nothing to do with the popular vote OR the electoral college....
:banhead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. We know what the rules are, this is an argument for the remaining Superdelegates to consider
You do remember them, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
49. It's been considered...
and apparently rejected (list for the past week, more at link) http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-endorsement-notes.html

You can see all of the superdelegates that have endorsed a candidate here

All remaining uncommitted superdelegates can be viewed here.

Dates shown are when we added the endorsment which doesn't necessarily mean the endorsement was made on that day.

5-20-08 - Added Rep. Madeleine Bordallo (GU) for Obama

5-19-08 - Added DNC Dwight Pelz (WA) for Obama
- Added Sen. Robert Byrd (WV) for Obama
- Added DNC Larry Gates (KS) for Obama
- Added DNC Blake Johnson (AK) and DNC Cindy Spanyers (AK) for Obama

5-18-08 - Added California add-ons Carolyn Doggett (CA)#, Dario Frommer (CA)# and Dora Rubio (CA)# for Clinton
- Added California add-ons William Quay Hays (CA)# and Lou Paulson (CA)# for Obama

5-17-08 - Added DNC Greg Pecoraro (MD) , new Kansas add-on Mark Parkinson (KS)# for Obama
- Colorado add-on Federico Pena (CO)# added for Obama

5-16-08 - Added Rep. Pete Stark (CA) for Obama
- Added DNC Keith Umemoto (CA) for Clinton. He endorsed "months ago" but just made it public.
- Added Rep. Brad Ellsworth (IN) for Clinton.
- Added DNC Eric Coleman (MI)and DNC Virgie Rollins (MI) for Obama.

5-15-08 - Added Rep. Jim McDermott (WA) for Obama
-Added Rep. Howard Berman (CA) for Obama
-Added Rep. Henry Waxman (CA) for Obama
- Added DNC Larry Cohen (DC) for Obama

5-14-08 - Added DNC Christine Marques (DA)* for Obama
- Added Rep. Peter Visclosky (IN) for Obama
- Added TN Add-on Vicky Harwell (TN)# for Clinton
- Added DNC Mike Morgan (OK) for Obama
- Added DNC Lena Taylor (WI) for Obama
- Added DNC Robert Ficano (MI) for Obama

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. Right, except the difference is, Al Gore actually DID WIN "The Popular Vote".
Here, the Hillary Campaign is just making shit up.

Oh, and Terry "the rules are the rules" McAuliffe wants to count FL and MI? That's fucking rich.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/25/165935/668

"Carl, take it to the bank," I said. "They will not get a credential. The closest they'll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. oh DUH, comparing the general election to primaries
--but Hillary's "base" is the low-information voter who doesn't know the difference between DELEGATES and "popular vote" -- and what about my state, Maine, and three others, where you don't even know what the so-called popular vote even was?

but live in your little delusional world, if you choose, and try to grasp the fact that, even with your made-up "popular vote" BS, not one superdelegate has switched over to Chairman Hillary and, in fact, they are running screaming from her even when they are tempted with bribes by Senator Punjab's billionaire buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
35. This is getting tiresome. There IS NO popular vote count.
Doesn't exist. Can't be counted. Is a non-entity.

But I think you know that by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. It is down right unethical of her to make that kind of claim,
Edited on Tue May-20-08 12:42 AM by Douglas Carpenter
Many naive people may not know the facts, but she certainly does,

Either she is down right irrational or she is intentionally trying to sabotage the Democratic Party by attempting to de-legitimize the inevitable nominee.

Her behavior is shameless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I now believe your use of the word "sabotage" might be suitable.
And we are all having to pretend not to notice. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. well frankly, I have tried to be understanding and empathetic
Sen. Obama was not my first choice either

I realize that its an extremely emotionally painful thing for Sen Clinton, her family and many of her supporters.

But they are simply going waaaaaaaay toooooooo far.

It's destructive.

Wouldn't it be really sad if the largest contribution of the Clinton legacy was wrecking the Democratic Party and causing the election of John McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
georgecolombo Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. I'm With You
Isn't it clear now that Hillary Clinton cares nothing about the fortunes of the Democratic Party and, frankly, cares little about the fate of the country. She is selfish, self-absorbed, and toxic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. I share all your views expressed in that post.
Obama was not my first choice either. In fact, I wavered a bit between Clinton and Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. Agree
She may not be the brightest bulb on the tree, but yes, smart enough to know she is using deceit and sowing confusion to gain her goals. It is unethical behavior, to say the least, with regards to what she is telling voters. She tells more lies and exaggerations than the current administration - who needs more of that in office?

My only consolation is that this is one of the few times that unethical behavior will not be rewarded. In fact, I'd bet Ms. Hillary will never be taken seriously as a candidate again - time will reveal what a liability she turned herself into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. Sad to see this
Two people I once respected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROh70 Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. Not winning
The following point needs to be made everytime someone raises the popular vote nonsense:

HRC leads in the popular vote only if you don't count and disenfranchise voters from Washington, Nevada, Iowa, and Maine. If you include estimates from those four states, Obama wins the popular vote.

Now, why people are pointing out that HRC's argument for counting Michigan and Florida doesn't seem to apply when it comes to the four states mentioned above. Why not?

To repeat - HRC's popular vote argument is not based on counting the vote in all 50 states, but based on counting the vote in only 46 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. If Hillary insists on pushing this to the convention I bet her political
career is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
25. FL and MI don't even count. They didn't campaign there. Disadvantage to unknown candidates,
obviously.

Plus not all caucus states report "popular vote" numbers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
27. Hillary uses Rove for her new math
Which makes her math entirely and completely bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. Robert Zimmerman ... but the Texas caucus was held in the EVENING
Argument: Fail.

I guess shift workers and laborers all work evenings in Texas. What a coincidence.

Regarding popular vote, no matter how you count them, the Democratic nominee will need to turn 17 million primary votes into 60 million general election votes. Hillary Clinton won't be able to do that with her consistently high negatives.

K/R madfloridian!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. Desperate & pathetic
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
georgecolombo Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. Obama Says Be Nice To Hillary Supporters (But It's Damn Difficult)
I caught Geraldine Ferraro on The Today Show this morning and could feel my blood pressure rising with almost every word that came out of her mouth. The arguments coming from the Clinton camp are alternatively ridiculous and reprehensible. Ferraro is like a petulant child. She rattles off a litany of imaginary slights to Hillary (and, by extension in her mind, to all women) and is prepared to damage the party -- and the country -- on that basis. And as this kind of rhetoric permeates the discussion, Hillary tacitly encourages it.

I wish I could adopt an attitude as magnanimous as Obama's... but I can't. Hillary Clinton and surrogates like Ferraro are reckless, self-absorbed, and are apparently eager to inflict four more years of Republican rule on the country because their candidate ran a poor campaign. They are despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
33. It would be a slap in the face for her to declare victory tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fiorello Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
40. The trick is: their count gives Obama ZERO votes from Michigan
This is why the Clinton vote count is dishonest. Quibbling over caucuses is small potatoes.

Clinton got 300,000 votes in Michigan.

Obama got zero. He wasn't on the ballot.

Before the vote, Obama supporters in Michigan asked people to vote "uncommitted".

"Uncommitted" got 200,000 votes.

Add this to the Obama total, and he is back in the lead in popular votes.

More history: just before the Michigan vote, Gov. Granholm (a Hillary supporter) denounced the call to vote "uncommitted" for Obama as "making a travesty of the voting process". Once the vote was over, she changed her mind and said that Hillary had won fair and square. Oops.

So 40% of the state voted to say that the vote was "a travesty".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. The other trick is: It doesn't count Iowa, Nevada, Maine, or Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
42. I'm just gonna have to start ignoring Hillary's "new math / new benchmarks" bullshit.
It's so irrational ... it's making me crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
43. Spouting the popular vote does nothing but divide the party
It is not a valid metric as long as we have caucus states involved in electing the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
45. More about Zimmerman...won't let up on FL and MI issues. Spins terribly on that issue
From April:

Clinton's top fundraisers ripping into Howard Dean again today. Whiny attitudes.

Their attitudes make me think this will just go on and on and on.

A second prominent Democratic fundraiser, Robert Zimmerman, a Democratic National Committeeman and key Hillary fundraiser, sounded a similar note in an interview with me today.

"Howard Dean is more committed to pressuring the super delegates to make up their minds before the voting is done than he is to ensuring that Michigan and Florida's votes are counted," Zimmerman charged.


This is tiresome.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
47. The meaningless, non-existent "popular vote"
Something they just made up. Hillary's campaign has electrolytes. It's what Democrats crave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
48. OMG...Bill Clinton is just pathetic now. This is embarrassing.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/05/20/politics/fromtheroad/entry4110077.shtml

"But the only new thing the Clintons had to say on primary eve came from her husband, who accused the press of not caring about the needs of voters and favoring other candidates over his wife.

Bill Clinton echoed statements Hillary herself made in the past few days, verifying that attacking the media has now become a Clinton campaign talking point.

“Every time you turn on the television and you listen one of those people dissing her, they all have a college degree, they’ve all got a new job, they’ve all got healthcare, and they're not going broke putting filling up their gas tank," said Bill Clinton."

" Around 1,300 supporters – mostly women – came out to see Hillary Clinton speak last night in Lexington on the eve of the Kentucky primary when her husband came out to give her introduction, which he called "the easy job."

"Just remember, all these people who are telling you it's over..." instructed the former president as several women began to scream "No!" in protest.

"First of all, by their own admission, this has been the most slanted press coverage in American history. Secondly, they declared her dead more times than a cat’s got lives."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
georgecolombo Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. The Clintons Have Become Virtually Indistinguishable From Republicans
Bill appears on the Rush Limbaugh Show, Hillary revels in an endorsement from Richard Mellon Scaithe. They're both complaining about the mainstream media. And, most recently, she is citing arguments developed by Karl Rove as justification for continuing her campaign.

All of these points are factual and indisputable. And, when you think about it, they really don't require comment. They simply speak for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Fuck you very much Bill.
A lot of us with college degrees do not have a job, healthcare, or a car. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. ...by keeping her name on ballots she wasn't supposed to be on and where her
fellow Democrats were not competing with her ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. And, DU/Hillary supporters certainly know that . . . right????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robyn66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
55. Hillary DOES have the popular vote
If you allow Florida-who broke the rules and where none of the other candidates campaigned.

If you allow Michigan (who broke the rules) and where Hillary was the ONLY ONE ON THE BALLOT (I don't know how even THEY can justify that one!)

... and if you take away Obama's votes! Because its ok to disenfranchise the caucus states... unless Hillary needs them.

AND regardless of popular vote and delegate count BECAUSE even though Obama is ahead in the delegate count and the popular vote that lives here in the real world, because there is no one with the exact number to win the nomination Hillary should be given the nomination anyway.

I don't know how Hillary's people can go on TV and talk about this stuff with a straight face. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC