Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If RFK's Babby Boy Understands What Hillary Meant why Can't DUer's?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:46 AM
Original message
If RFK's Babby Boy Understands What Hillary Meant why Can't DUer's?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/rfk-jr-says-no.html



In a statement, Kennedy Jr. said: “It is clear from the context that Hillary was invoking a familiar political circumstance in order to support her decision to stay in the race through June. I have heard her make this reference before, also citing her husband's 1992 race, both of which were hard fought through June. I understand how highly charged the atmosphere is, but I think it is a mistake for people to take offense.”





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. the 'baters and messiah worshippers don't care what rfk jr thinks nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsT Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. What did you post about bittergate/ snubgate and facescratchinggate?
I am curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I care more about what I think. It comes back to the question,
What is Hillary's motivation? She knows she cannot be Nominated the race. She lost, and has known that for weeks, maybe months. So, what is her motivation for staying in? And, what is her motivation for her comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
57. How do you know what RFK Jr. really thinks?
What else is he going to say publicly? At least he has class, unlike Hillary.

And no, I don't need to have any class. RFK, jr. is in a position of authority in the party and is compelled to polite and to not offend Hillary or her supporters. I have no such constraints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #57
70. Precisely! Kick for Truth! Well Put!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
82. RFK Jr gets to have his opinion. I give all people who have suffered
a loss the right to their opinion. But I doubt his brother, David, would feel the same way. He saw his father murdered on TV and eventually would die of self-destructive behavior the family laid onto that moment. Everyone in that family is entitled to their opinion and no one can say one word or the other about it. But for me, it sucked monstrously what she said and nothing will change that. All the dipshits out there that find nothing awful about her remarks are going to answer some day to God about it. You need to examine your consciences. If you can find them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. A shill by any other name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. This has much less to do with the Kennedys and much MORE to do with the spectre of Obama
Edited on Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM by jenmito
being assassinated in June, justifying her reason for staying in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. Yep.
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:20 AM by HereSince1628
It would be a whole lot easier to accept as a mistake if the Clintons hadn't been doing thinly veiled language all spring. Always skirting the edge of two meanings. One sinister, the other innocent. They have proven that they are masters at this.


So, yes indeed, she was talking about June. And the way she did that was to remind everyone that a terrible thing happened in June 1968.
This from the most politically astute team in American politics? An accidental slip of the tongue? I just don't think so.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. Exactly. And for the MSM to "give her the benefit of the doubt" saying she apologized when
she didn't, and saying she was probably tired (even while pointing out she said this before) makes me sick. ESPECIALLY when her supporters blame US for it all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #32
74. good post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. RFK Jr got his apology...
Malia, Sascha, and Michelle are still waiting.

Fuck Hillary and horse she rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because these people need drama and indignation like a junky needs heroin.
They're hooked on outrage and hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. more people to add to my ignore list
If you can't *understand* this, than there's something wrong with you. Even if you don't agree with how people see this, you should be able to understand it. Honest to god it's not that difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. LOL! You kids are so funny with this "I'M GOING TO IGNORE YOU!1!1!!!!" routine.
It's so eighth grade mean girl, like people are supposed to be devastated that some self-important twit is making a big song and dance of not listening to them.

Grow up, Heather.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. Thanks for that! All of this "I'm putting you on my Ignore List" is much more about POWER, than
it is about the Issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. You are welcome. It has gotten so old.
I hate what this crowd has done to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Yes, I started commenting on Troll Wars a few months ago, but let it drop.Time to pick it up again.
There IS something to be gained by those who really do want, more than anything else, to adapt and grow toward the truth, but they must start by being aware that they are caught in between "muckers" in both camps, who indeed do know who and what they and their reciprocals on the other side and their goals are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
51. I just wish people would start talking again,
as opposed to shrieking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #51
64. Asking one another honest questions and answering honestly would be a good starting point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. We used to see some of that on DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. By that principle, if you can't understand their not understanding, then there's something wrong
with you too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. "These People"? You mean Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. No, the indignation junkies, many of whom, I am convinced, are not Democrats at all
but just plain old trolls here to create division.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Are you talking about your friends at Hillary is (not) 44?
Tell me again how you and your friends feel about Ted Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Are you talking out your, well, um, you know, again?
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:00 AM by QC
I don't support Hillary, didn't vote for her, and have never been to that site.

I do, however, think that a day of nonstop drama tantrums is enough. Don't you? Or do you think that something is accomplished by people running around weeping and wailing and rending their garments and in general acting like a bunch of loons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #26
46. Here's what I think.
I think Hillary supporters should admit she was wrong instead of going through the contorted defenses of Hillary. That's a much better way to go. You can't blame people for being outraged, but you can blame people for flatly defending her comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. I can--and do--blame the guilty parties for both...
refusing to admit that Clinton's remarks were, at best, excruciatingly tactless and ill-considered, and responding to those remarks by posting hundreds of "FUCKING FUCK FUCKING HILLARY FUCK HER FUCK HER FUCK FUCK FUCK!!!1!1!!!!1!1!!!" posts.

You have been here long enough to know that there was a time when we had a good bit of rational discussion on DU. It hasn't been that way these past few months, in large part because the forum has become a playground for blind fanatics and shrieking drama queens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #50
67. It's primary season
And this won't settle down until it's over. I know how shitty the primaries can be. This is like torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. Yes, it's awful, and this is much worse than the last. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
39. THAT is a Biological certitude. This addiction pervades every walk of American "life".
Gossip is the national past-time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. I understood her also. She spoke poorly though, and she is
really hurting from it. She looks very tired.

She should have been less specific about RFK, and more specific in recounting the number of times and dates the primary was settled in June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezy2736 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. "If RFK's Babby Boy Understands..."
Fail.

Most times I can let that pass, but today I'm not feeling too generous.

And just having the word "understand" so close... A true oasis of hilarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Its clear from her apology to RFK that she doesn't even know what she did wrong.
Clueless. What can I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
47. I wouldn't call that an apology,
I regret my words IF it was offensive
I agree with you she has no clue.

Maybe IF she suspended her Secret Service Detail that she has had since 1992
the outrage of what she said would become more clear to her.

Not wishing any harm to befall her, but for someone who has lived with the treat of possible assassination since 1992, she should chose her words more carefully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. I know what she meant but she picked the poorest way to express it
and a president's greatest tool is words. If she can't express a simple thought like 'it ain't over til it's over' without riling up half of America, how will she play on the world stage? This is hardly the first time she has done something similar. Had Bush said that we'd all be all over him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Exactly. Spot on. She is not capable of maintaining a communication
with America, without stirring up shit.

Just look at all of the horrendous things that have been repeated on the airwaves because she chose the worst way to say something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. She's raised assassination before and her surrogates have directly said Obama could be killed...
There have been about 3 other campaigns-more recent ones-that went into June with no assassination involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
35. I've been wondering why those previous mentions weren't met with so much sturm und dang. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Video is much more powerful than words on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. This is true. All of the very important non-verbal cues are there.
I guess those previous incidents were mentioned here on the DU, just lost in the blizzard of Troll Wars.

It is just that environments such as this are sooooooo manipulable by even just a few well organized purposeful individuals, most effectively on BOTH sides, so I must observe, that this recent storm could easily be (but isn't necessarily) another orchestrated event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #44
55. I agree...
good post. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #55
71. It will be good when the non-Troll, but somewhat benighted, members of DU evolve to the next level
and start reacting more strategically to what the hot-button pushers are doing. Going to the next level will be a skill that generalizes well out there in the REAL world of Grassroots organizing.

:hi: Back at you, jenmito! :hi:

Solidarity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #71
79. I feel the same way...
Yup-Solidarity! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think DUers understand what she meant too.
At least the non-Clinton cultists do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. To all the AAs and Obama supporters that go to bed praying for his safety EVERY night
to his family

to those that acknowledge the extraordinary threat... to the most prestigious police force in the world (Secret Service) that are working SO VERY hard to protect him...

Frankly... you absolutely do NOT get it... maybe you should at least TRY, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. If he can understand, why can't you?
I thought it was a poor thing to say, but if RFK,Jr. can accept it I certainly can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. i understand what she meant, but i think it was totally tone deaf to use that example
that's my issue.

she says stupid things, with great frequency.

just yesterday i was thinking she should be VP and then she does this.

everytime i try to give her the benefit of the doubt something happens:

1) "hard working white americans"
2) florida primary = zimbabwe
3) as far as i know (not a deal breaker there, but smarmy nontheless)
4) the stupid ass red states don't count, caucuses are unfair, etc. etc.
5) saying she was ahead in the popular vote while excluding 4 states from that count AND saying this was fair

sheesh. she says stupid things and i don't know why, it's not helping her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is about who we are and what our relationships to her are. RFK is entitled to his position.
So is everyone else, because there's no way to adapt and grow unless you begin with an authentic position, right or wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
29. He's a SUPPORTER giving her benefit of the doubt. Fine, but still DUMB to say .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. What does Ted Think?
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:10 AM by 4themind
Do you know? Did Hillary know what he would have thought? If she somehow knew, did she sufficiently care about the feelings of ALL of the kennedy's before she made this comment? If she did not why did she risk even the POSSIBILITY of the effect of her referencing the assassination, just before the 40th anniversary of the shooting, and to use it for personal political justification?? Does the opinion of the son cancel out or supercede that of the brother(whom IIRC has yet to speak)? I'm not trying to be snarky but maybe the verdict is still out on the full impact of her statement among the Kennedy family either way would you agree? Although I think we'd both agree that the issue has been assumed too much to either side of the spectrum on DU, but I'd really like to hear what Teddy thinks, and I will be sympathetic to his feelings on this.
t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Teddy is not her supporter. . .
So I would guess she thinks, "Screw him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. What he also said
was that he had neither read it or heard the video of what she said.

If he does his homework and sees/reads it and still has the same opinion, then perhaps he is of similar character to Hillary, which means it wouldn't bother him at all. There are lots of people who believe there are no real boundaries when you are trying to win power, like the behavior of those we currently have in office.

Not a place I want to be or want our country to be any longer, but we will get what we vote for in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
34. Thank you for repeating this message. I hope we can
realize we are here to vote on a important race that involves so many important issues that are being decided for us why we emotionally decide if someones statements crossed a line that does not need to be discussed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. Didn't he break from the fold...
when the rest of his family endorsed Obama? Why wouldn't he defend her stupid statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
38. I know what she wants me to think it meant
Edited on Sat May-24-08 11:03 AM by realpolitik
and as reasons to stay in the race go it is one that makes no sense, in a first world democracy.

Now, if this were Pakistan, Iraq, Israel, or any of those third world nations that assassinate their opposition politicians and one can make that argument, very severe measures are warranted to restore democracy to the world's largest military power. Capital punishment severe. Nuremberg severe.

So which is it?

If HRC's comment is not a fear mongering slam on Obama, it is an admission that we are a failed state-- a rogue and lawless nation that is liable to kill another reformer as, if you buy her argument, we have done regularly enough for forty years that is requires a safety backup. If that is the case, I expect her to run the rest of her campaign from an undisclosed location.

We are not, then, simply a rogue nation, but a nucular(tm) rogue nation at that. If Hillary is correct in her concern, then will she support asking the UN to oversee this election? Will she support the de-baathification of American government?

Otherwise she does not want to solve what is a fatal illness for a democracy... fear of participation in one's own government, just use it to ramp up fear...

That seems familiar, somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. Meanwhile, John McCain's had FOUR Malignant Melanoma's since 2000.
But, apparently no Obama supporters have bothered to notice, much less care. That's FOUR bouts of skin cancer kept out of the news....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
43. Not surprising
That you would want someone to tell you how to feel about such a situation. So tell me this, when so many people knew what Obama meant with his bitter comment did you stand up for him? Or were you silent or tagged along with Hillary supporters? I'm not going to get tired of asking this question because now that the tables are turned most of you don't want to answer it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
45. Because I honestly believe that RFK, Jr is employing psychological defense mechanisms.
He can't permit himself that friend for decades is a truly VILE narcissistic sociopath.

However, as what she said "sinks in," I have an inkling that he will distance himself from her in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
48. Getting paid to post positive comments for Hillary? Here's your link:

voteforhillaryonline.blogspot.com/2007/11/get-paid-to-post-positive-comments.html


Pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing bolt Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
49. One possibility
It's possible that our fellow DU'ers share RFK Jr.'s view, but pretend not to do so in order to "harm" their rival, or just to have a good time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
52. From all evidence, Senator Kennedy's 11 children are all grown up,
that is, the ones that survive.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr is not uniquely amazing, but he is almost so, and in any case one of the most impressive citizens I could name.

His model of citizenship is IMO the exact and total opposite of the Bush model, and both families are New England Big Money and iconic.

RFK Jr is a New York resident. He is extraordinarily and influentially active in environmental affairs in that part of our country. His endorsement of his own state's U.S. Senator for the White House makes practical sense, as it is thru her and Chuck Schumer's offices that any meaningful environmental reform would have to go before it reaches the legislation stage on the floor of the Senate to become national policy.

If Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. walked into a tavern I was in, I would fight anybody in the joint to the death for the privilege of buying him a beer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Hey OC
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:48 AM by Swamp Rat
I see a few DUers posting threads about RFKjr as a rebuttal to criticisms of Hillary's poor choice of words. It's really a fallacious, Big Man argument because it does not matter what RFKjs says. What matters is what Hillary said in light of American history and political assassination, and the fear of future assassinations, both on the national level and within African American communities.

The omission of consideration of African Americans, in particular, belies a callousness at best.

I think I'll get some coffee now. :hangover:

edit: coffee retreived :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. I'm omitting a lot and probably shouldn't.
True that RFK Jr endorsed HRC but true also that he and his uncles and dad were genuinely committed to Afro Americans in broad and inclusive gestures of citizenship.

True that I did not say so and ought to have.

Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. Sorry, That is not what I meant.
I am talking about people quoting RFKjr's statement/reaction to Hillary's screw-up in order to justifiy their blatantly incendiary remarks and ad hominem about DUers who are upset after this dredging-up of horrible memories, i.e. June 5-6th, 1968, as well as other assassinations.

Their desperation and offense is worse than meets the eye.

I hope I was clear this time, as I just woke up. :hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. Well, if there's any of that coffee left, can I beg a cup of it?
I think I'm the one who's cement-brained, not you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
53. Two points
First, a single incident on its own merits wouldn't be that big of a deal but as the list Olbermann put together in his comment mentions it was hardly an isolated incident,. It's easier to forgive or forget one or a few than it is with many, eventually nerves get rubbed raw and it all becomes an irritant. I'd think that's a part of it.

Second part can be found here. http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/02/20/racist-attacks-on-obama-growing-more-heated/

For some it was a stray comment that didn't mean much, for a lot of others it was at best putting the wrong ideas into heads that are already having too many wrong ideas and at worst it might have been a hope. Freudian slip or something about an imagined path to the nomination or something discussed in private.

Given the history of black leaders when they get too powerful you can't really question why it's a difficult subject, more so for some than for others. It shouldn't have been said, even if it wasn't our concern to start with it should still be one we try to understand and account for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
54. Why? Because hes a positive person
But Hillary's campaign ran a horrible campaign against Obama and complained to the media about every Gaffe he made and called him out on them. Obama's not doing that here but you damn better know his supporters are going to. We won't forget what kind of disastrous RW campaign Hillary ran against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
59. He wants Hillary as V.P. so that he can have her senate seat
sorry, but I've got to call them like I see them. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
60. What is a "babby?"
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
61. Because he is not the only one affected by this.
She used Ted Kennedy's current situation to excuse her words. Words she also uttered in March. What is her excuse then?

She also deliberately did not apologize to the Obama family, I think she owes them one as well.

This was deliberate and rehearsed to be used if needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skrelnick Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
62. A poor explanation for a HORRIBLE analogy
Sorry, not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
65. Because the insult was to Obama and his supporters
I don't care if Hillary-supporter RFK Jr. is not bothered by her remark. The implication of her words was not directed to him. You seem to buy into the idea that her apology to the Kennedy's was sufficient. She should have been apologizing to Obama and his supporters, with whom the fear of assassination is all too real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
72. If RFK Jr. Isn't livid at his father being used as a political football
I don't personally understand it but, I'll be angry for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. Jethro Tull: "Thick as a Brick"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. Ooh, nice find Swampy
I love Tull
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
73. You left out the party where Bobby Jr admitted to not having seen or heard the comment
Plus the comments weren't aimed at RFK jr, they were aimed at Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YBR31 Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
75. If RFK's Babby Boy Understands What Hillary Meant why Can't DUer's?
Hillary could have easily made her point about the timing of the primaries lasting past June in the past without raising the prospect of assassination. She knew what she was doing. She raised the assassination topic before (http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/05/hillarys_bizarre_rfk_comment.html) Moreover, her argument is misleading, in 1968, the primaries started later. The New Hampshire primary was in March of 1968 not January. In 1992, Tsongas dropped out in March and the primaries were effectively over at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
77. He is a Hillary surrogate and has stated such
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
78. In the immediate shadow of Huckabee's grotesque gaffe at the NRA convention
Her instincts should have cut that reference out of her speech. I am still reeling from the Huckster's comments at the NRA convention. I'm surprised that she wouldn't also still be so grossed out by his remarks that she'd stop herself from rolling out a careless remark like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
81. Another ridiculous logical fallacy - "appeal to authority." RFK's "Babby (Sic) Boy's" opinion is
just that: his opinion. It changes nothing as regards the vile nature of HRC's filthy remarks - or the POS's that defend her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC