jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:23 PM
Original message |
For a campaign that is in General Election mode this board sure is spending a lot of time on Clinton |
KSinTX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Did you hear that McCain thinks Webb's GI bill is *too generous* |
|
to veterans returning from war?
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. where's the list of people who voted with McCain on that one? |
|
I bet my guy did and I'd love to make a huge banner to hang in town this summer
|
KSinTX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
22. Umm, McCain sorta didn't make it |
|
He was on Ellen's show talking about gay marriage. Any of these yours?
Senators Who Voted Against NAYs ---22
Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Barrasso (R-WY) Bennett (R-UT) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burr (R-NC) Cochran (R-MS) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) DeMint (R-SC) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hatch (R-UT) Kyl (R-AZ) Lugar (R-IN) McConnell (R-KY) Sessions (R-AL) Voinovich (R-OH)
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. shockaroo, for once a Georgia Senator was not on the list of assholes |
KSinTX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Pox on you! My numnutz (one) was - Cornyn |
|
I am gaining more and more respect for madam Kay Bailey Hutchison as time goes on. I don't know if it's that she's getting better or because I'm seeing her compared to Cornyn.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah McCain thinks every GI should find themselves a sugar momma |
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:27 PM
Original message |
"This board" isn't "the campaign" |
kerry-is-my-prez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Thank God - if it were - McCain would be the Dem candidate. |
|
That's how screwed up this place is.
|
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. That's just a stupid statement |
|
This board reflects the turmoil that's going on within the party. There is a civil war raging in the Democratic party, which most people can't see for all the smoke. It's a battle for control -- who will run the party, the DLC or the DNC. This is why Hillary and Bill and their DLC partners are engaged in a slash-and-burn campaign. This is why the DNC got suckered by the Hillary gang into the self-destructive sanctions against FL and MI. The only thing that can come out of that is a loss of credibility by the DNC. It was a setup from Day 1.
Most people, even here, are dazzled by the bright, shiny objects and can't see what's going on behind the scenes, as the battle for control of the party rages on. Bill and Hill want to be the emperor and empress of the party with their DLC courtiers right behind them. That's why she's not dropping out and that's why they don't care what happens to Obama.
Right now, Bill is the presumptive head of the party. If Hill drops out, and Obama is elected, then he becomes the head of the party. This is why Bill is campaigning full speed ahead to trash Obama.
Hillary won't drop out until she and Bill are assured they can have their hands on the levers of power in the party. It has nothing to do with being VP or anything like that. They have been in control for nearly 20 years. They aren't giving that up without a fight.
|
gcomeau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. As long as Clinton insists... |
|
...on conducting herself in a manner designed to torpedo our GE prospects, she's going to be a focus of discussion whether we're in GE more or not.
|
americanstranger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. Precisely. As long as she is still 'fighting,' |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Why? Because she's a fly in the ointment by not having the grace to concede. |
2rth2pwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
7. They know she can still win it. |
|
Edited on Tue May-27-08 01:32 PM by 2rth2pwr
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Either that or they have been smacked upside the head with a shovel |
|
and believe "she can still win it".
Obama is the presumptive nominee. Period.
|
Arrowhead2k1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yeah sure, we'll see very soon. |
|
Gee, I can't wait until shit finally sinks in for you all.
|
gcomeau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. No, we know she can still lose the GE for Obama. |
|
Which she appears to be enthusiastically attempting to do.
There is no chance in hell she can still win herself. She is out of reach of the nomination, no matter what the rules committee decides on the 31st.
|
smiley_glad_hands
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. She can still win what? The lottery? She's already lost the nomination. eom |
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. She's still waiting on that "something could happen" win. n/t |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
8. This is primaries discussion. So we discuss the 2 candidates in |
|
the democratic primaries. Pretty simple.
|
PoliticalAmazon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
13. One would expect with Hillary using assassination as a campaign tool that there.... |
|
would be some discussion about it.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
15. barack-65%...john-43% |
|
but when the machines are done it will be barack by 5% with just enough electoral college votes to put him in the whitehouse
|
Tommy_Carcetti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
17. See an old post of mine: |
|
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6066336I got crucified for posting it. But honestly, this all is very counterproductive. There definitely is an air of mob mentality going on right now. Hopefully it will pass.
|
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
20. It's called "obsession". |
Jakes Progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. But what are they obsessed with? |
|
Obama Love? Hillary Hate? or just Losing?
Winning in November is certainly not their top priority.
|
cbc5g
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
25. I wish we could stop talking about Clinton and head into GE mode |
|
But Hillary just keeps bringing herself up and attacking Obama in the worst of ways.
|
VotesForWomen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
26. yep; they are rightly insecure about whether O really has the nom or not. |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-27-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
27. the OP is a mite confused. Obama's campaign is in general election |
|
mode and focusing on McCain. And yes, some Obama supporters here are worried that Obama won't be the nominee. It's an unreasonable worry, but there it is.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |